Blog

  • Housing Hope Everett: 2026 Guide & New Tomorrow’s Hope

    Housing Hope Everett: 2026 Guide & New Tomorrow’s Hope

    Quick answer: Housing Hope is Everett’s largest affordable-housing nonprofit. It manages more than 650 affordable rental units across 24 sites in Snohomish County and Camano Island, has helped 328 households become homeowners through its Team HomeBuilding sweat-equity program, and is breaking ground in 2026 on a new 26,700-square-foot Tomorrow’s Hope Child Development Center at 4526 Federal Avenue in partnership with Compass Health. The organization has a new CEO and is chasing a 1,000-unit goal by 2030.

    Drive past 4526 Federal Avenue right now and you will see survey stakes, fresh fencing, and site-prep equipment on the northeast corner of the Compass Health campus. That is a 26,700-square-foot child development center under construction. It belongs to Housing Hope — and most Everett residents have never heard of the organization that is building it.

    That is unusual. Housing Hope manages more than 650 affordable rental units across 24 sites in Snohomish County. It runs a sweat-equity homeownership program that has produced 328 first-time homeowners. It operates a child development center that has served Everett families for more than thirty years. It is the largest affordable-housing nonprofit in the city. And it is in the middle of its biggest year in a long time.

    This is the complete 2026 guide to Housing Hope: what it does, where it operates, the new Tomorrow’s Hope project at 4526 Federal Avenue, the new CEO at the top, and the 1,000-unit goal driving the next four years.

    What Housing Hope Actually Does

    Housing Hope’s mission is to promote and provide affordable housing and tailored services that reduce homelessness and poverty across Snohomish County and Camano Island. In practice, the organization operates five integrated programs:

    1. Affordable rental housing. More than 650 units across 24 sites. Rents are set on a sliding scale based on household income and family size — not market rate. The portfolio runs from single-room transitional units to family-sized apartments specifically designed for households exiting homelessness.

    2. Team HomeBuilding. A sweat-equity homeownership program where working families help build their own and each other’s homes. The program has produced 328 first-time homeowner households. Participants commit hundreds of hours of construction labor in exchange for a deeply discounted mortgage on a home they helped frame, side, and finish.

    3. Tomorrow’s Hope Child Development Center. Quality childcare for kids aged four weeks through twelve years, with a sliding-scale fee structure that prioritizes families currently living in Housing Hope properties or recently exited from homelessness. The current facility has operated for more than 30 years and is being replaced by a much larger purpose-built building at 4526 Federal Avenue.

    4. Workforce and family services. Career counseling, financial coaching, and family stability supports embedded inside the housing portfolio. The integration is the point — residents do not have to leave the property to access services.

    5. Development and acquisition. Housing Hope’s real estate development arm acquires sites, secures funding stacks (federal LIHTC, state Housing Trust Fund, county and city contributions), designs new housing, and operates the resulting buildings. The organization has been one of the most consistent affordable-housing developers in Snohomish County for thirty years.

    The New Tomorrow’s Hope at 4526 Federal Avenue

    The signature 2026 project is a new 26,700-square-foot Tomorrow’s Hope Child Development Center on the Compass Health campus at 4526 Federal Avenue. Several things matter about that project:

    Capacity triples. The current Tomorrow’s Hope serves a fraction of the demand the program receives. The new building expands enrollment dramatically, with classroom space designed for kids from infancy through age twelve.

    The Compass Health partnership is real. Compass is the dominant behavioral-health provider in Snohomish County. Co-locating childcare on the Compass Health campus puts behavioral-health services and childcare in the same place — which matters for families navigating both at once.

    Funding is layered. Affordable-housing-and-services projects of this scale do not get built with one funding source. The financing typically combines state, county, and city contributions with private philanthropy and tax-credit equity. The fact that the project has reached site-prep means that capital stack is closed.

    The 30-year handoff. The existing Tomorrow’s Hope facility has been operating for more than three decades. Replacing it with a purpose-built modern center is the kind of generational handoff few nonprofits successfully execute. Housing Hope is doing it.

    The Leadership Change

    Housing Hope has a new CEO: Kathryn Opina. Leadership transitions at long-running nonprofits are inflection points — they reset strategy, relationships with funders, and operational culture. For an organization the size of Housing Hope at the moment of an active capital project and a 1,000-unit growth target, the timing is significant. Local civic watchers should be paying attention to how the new CEO frames the next four years.

    The 1,000-Unit Goal

    Housing Hope is publicly chasing a 1,000-unit goal by 2030. From the current 650+ portfolio, that is roughly 350 additional units across the remaining four years. At Snohomish County construction costs, that is a multi-hundred-million-dollar development pipeline. The organizations that move that kind of pipeline through approvals, financing, and construction usually sit at the table when local housing policy is debated. Housing Hope sits at that table for Snohomish County.

    Where Housing Hope Operates in Everett

    The 24 sites are spread across Snohomish County and Camano Island, with concentrations in Everett’s lower-income neighborhoods, on Casino Road in South Everett, near downtown, and along the corridors where transit access supports car-light households. Specific properties include transitional housing for families exiting homelessness, permanent supportive housing, family workforce housing, and senior housing — Housing Hope’s portfolio is intentionally diverse so that residents can move within the system as their circumstances change without leaving the network of services.

    Why Housing Hope Matters in 2026

    Three pieces of context make Housing Hope particularly relevant this year:

    Snohomish County’s housing-and-behavioral-health funding wave. The County Council recently approved $23 million for housing and behavioral health programs. Housing Hope is structurally positioned to absorb funding allocations from those streams.

    Everett’s CDBG / HOME / AHTF priority-setting. The city’s Community Development Advisory Committee is holding a May 5 public hearing on 2027 federal housing fund priorities. Housing Hope is both a funder applicant and a major operator of the kind of housing those funds target.

    The 51.8% inventory jump. Snohomish County’s housing inventory rose 51.8% in March 2026. That is a market-rate signal. The affordable-housing tier — which is what Housing Hope operates in — is structurally separate from market-rate inventory, and its tightness is not relieved by a market shift. The need does not move with the inventory chart.

    How Everett Residents Can Engage

    For a household needing housing or services: contact Housing Hope directly to inquire about waitlist availability, eligibility, and program intake. The organization serves residents of Snohomish County and Camano Island.

    For a household wanting to support the work: Housing Hope accepts financial contributions, in-kind donations, and volunteer hours, particularly for the Team HomeBuilding sweat-equity program where construction-skilled volunteers can directly accelerate move-in dates for participating families.

    For Everett residents wanting policy influence: the May 5 CDAC public hearing is one of the more direct levers for shaping how 2027 federal housing dollars get spent locally.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Housing Hope and where is it based?

    Housing Hope is an Everett-headquartered nonprofit that builds and operates affordable rental housing, supports homeownership through sweat-equity construction, and runs childcare and family services across Snohomish County and Camano Island.

    How many units does Housing Hope manage?

    More than 650 affordable rental units across 24 sites in Snohomish County and Camano Island, with a publicly stated goal of 1,000 units by 2030.

    What is the new Tomorrow’s Hope at 4526 Federal Avenue?

    A new 26,700-square-foot child development center under construction on the Compass Health campus at 4526 Federal Avenue in Everett. It replaces the current Tomorrow’s Hope facility and triples childcare capacity.

    Who is the new CEO of Housing Hope?

    Kathryn Opina is the new CEO of Housing Hope, leading the organization through its current capital expansion and the 1,000-unit growth target.

    What is Team HomeBuilding?

    Team HomeBuilding is Housing Hope’s sweat-equity homeownership program. Participating families commit hundreds of hours of construction labor on each other’s homes in exchange for a deeply discounted mortgage on a finished home they helped build. The program has produced 328 first-time homeowner households.

    How does Housing Hope set rent?

    Rent is set on a sliding scale based on household income and family size, not market rate. That is the structural distinction between affordable housing and market-rate housing.

    How can Everett residents support Housing Hope?

    Through financial contributions, in-kind donations, and volunteer hours, including direct construction labor on Team HomeBuilding projects. Residents seeking housing or services can contact Housing Hope directly to inquire about eligibility.

    Is Housing Hope related to Compass Health?

    Housing Hope and Compass Health are independent organizations. The new Tomorrow’s Hope facility is being built on Compass Health’s campus at 4526 Federal Avenue as a partnership project, co-locating childcare with behavioral-health services.

    Related Exploring Everett coverage:


  • Snohomish County Aerospace Suppliers: ATS Aftermarket Guide

    Snohomish County Aerospace Suppliers: ATS Aftermarket Guide

    Quick answer: Aviation Technical Services (ATS) is one of two heavy-aerospace anchors at Paine Field — the second-largest aerospace employer in Everett, with about 800 workers across a 500,000-square-foot airframe MRO hangar and a 50,000-square-foot component repair shop. For Snohomish County aerospace suppliers, ATS represents an aftermarket revenue channel that runs countercyclical to Boeing factory production: when new-aircraft deliveries slow, MRO work expands. Suppliers serving consumables, structures, avionics, and rotables can sell into both the Boeing factory and the ATS hangar from the same campus.

    If you supply Boeing in Everett, you already know the new-aircraft side of the local aerospace economy. The 737 MAX 10 North Line is activating this summer. The 777-9 program is ramping into a delivery wave anchored by Lufthansa’s just-confirmed Q1 2027 first acceptance. The KC-46 program is delivering on a steady Air Force cadence. That is the side of the business that drives most of the supplier conversations in Snohomish County.

    The other side of Paine Field — and the second-largest aerospace employer in Everett — is Aviation Technical Services (ATS). About 800 workers. A 500,000-square-foot airframe Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) hangar at the south end of the airport. A 50,000-square-foot component repair facility next door. The largest single MRO operation on the U.S. West Coast.

    For Snohomish County aerospace suppliers, ATS is not a duplicate of Boeing. It is a different revenue channel — the aftermarket — that operates on a different cycle and rewards a different supplier posture. This is the supplier guide.

    The Aftermarket vs. New-Aircraft Distinction Suppliers Need to Make

    Boeing factory demand is driven by aircraft production rates. When Boeing announces a rate increase — Rate 47 on the 737 line is the public number for this summer — supplier demand follows on a multi-month lag. When Boeing slows or pauses, suppliers feel it on a similar lag in the other direction.

    MRO demand is driven by airline fleet utilization, scheduled maintenance intervals (A-checks, C-checks, D-checks), and unscheduled events (in-service damage, corrosion, modification programs). It moves on a different cycle. Notably, when new-aircraft deliveries slow, airlines extend the service lives of existing airplanes — which produces more MRO demand, not less. The aftermarket runs countercyclical to factory production.

    That countercyclical property is the strategic value of ATS for a Snohomish County supplier. Selling into both Boeing and ATS smooths your demand curve.

    What ATS Buys

    The work scope at the Everett ATS campus is heavy MRO on Boeing 737 NG and MAX, 757, 767, 777, and Airbus A320 family aircraft, plus component overhaul on rotable parts. The supplier categories that flow through that scope:

    • Consumables — fasteners, sealants, adhesives, paints, abrasives. Heavy MRO consumes consumables at industrial scale.
    • Sheet metal stock and skins — repair work generates demand for replacement structural materials in the same alloys factory work uses.
    • Composite materials — increasingly relevant on 777 and A320 family work as composite content rises.
    • Avionics components — line-replaceable units (LRUs), wire harnesses, connectors, and the test equipment that validates them.
    • Structural assemblies — bulkheads, frames, ribs that come off airplanes and need to be supplied as repair stock.
    • Rotables — actuators, valves, pumps, generators, APUs, components that go through the 50,000-square-foot component repair facility.
    • Tooling and fixtures — MRO tooling overlaps with factory tooling but with a heavier lean toward portable, airframe-specific fixtures.
    • PPE and safety — fall protection, respirators, hearing protection at hangar scale.
    • Industrial services — non-destructive testing (NDT), specialty cleaning, plating, surface treatment, hazardous materials handling.

    The Geographic Advantage Suppliers Should Be Pricing

    If your facility is in Snohomish County, you have a logistics advantage at ATS that suppliers in other regions cannot match. Most MRO inputs are time-sensitive — a hangar with an airplane in a check window cannot wait two weeks for a fastener. Same-day delivery from a Snohomish County supplier to the south end of Paine Field is achievable. Suppliers in Texas, Florida, and overseas cannot match that turn.

    That advantage is not theoretical. Many ATS purchase orders go to local distributors precisely because the campus is on the same airport, on the same Airport Road, in the same county as the supplier base that grew up around Boeing. If you are a Snohomish County aerospace supplier and you have not built a relationship with the ATS purchasing function, you are leaving same-day-delivery margin on the table.

    The Workforce Picture

    The 5,200-worker aerospace shortage in Snohomish County affects ATS the same way it affects Boeing. Suppliers who help solve workforce — apprenticeship programs, training partnerships, recruiting pipelines, contract labor for surge periods — have a relationship-building lever at ATS that strict component sales do not always offer. Workforce-adjacent suppliers should be in that conversation.

    How to Get Into the ATS Supply Chain

    ATS, like other large MRO operators, runs a procurement function with vetting requirements: quality system audits, AS9100 or AS9110 alignment for relevant categories (AS9110 specifically governs MRO suppliers), FAA-aligned documentation practices, and on-time delivery histories. A Snohomish County supplier already qualified to Boeing’s standards is positioned to qualify at ATS with relatively modest incremental work — but you have to actually run that incremental qualification process.

    Practical first steps:

    1. Map your current product lines against the ATS work scope (737/757/767/777/A320 airframe MRO, plus component repair).
    2. Identify which of your Boeing-qualified product lines have direct MRO equivalents.
    3. Confirm AS9110 if you serve MRO end-customers; AS9100 alone may not be sufficient for MRO supplier status.
    4. Build a same-day-delivery pitch around your Snohomish County address. That is your real edge.

    What 2026 Means for ATS Suppliers

    Two things put ATS in a particularly useful position for suppliers right now:

    Lufthansa just confirmed first 777-9 delivery slips to Q1 2027. Slips like that often correlate with airlines extending the in-service life of existing widebodies — which means more MRO demand on 777-200, 777-300, and 767 platforms. ATS sees that demand directly.

    The 737 MAX 10 North Line is activating this summer. New airplanes flow into airline service over the following years and become MRO inventory roughly five to seven years after delivery. That is a multi-decade tailwind, not a one-quarter event.

    For a Snohomish County supplier, the rational read is: build the ATS relationship now, while the strategic visibility is high and competitors elsewhere may be focused only on the Boeing factory side.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Is ATS the same as Boeing?

    No. ATS is an independent commercial MRO operator at the south end of Paine Field. It does heavy maintenance on airplanes already in airline service. Boeing builds new airplanes at the north end of the same airport.

    What aircraft programs does ATS support?

    The Everett facility services Boeing 737 NG and MAX, 757, 767, 777, and Airbus A320 family aircraft, plus rotable component repair across those fleets.

    What quality certifications matter for ATS suppliers?

    AS9100 and AS9110 are the dominant quality system certifications across aerospace and MRO supply chains. AS9110 specifically governs MRO suppliers; AS9100 is the broader aerospace standard. Suppliers serving MRO end-customers should map their certifications against both.

    Why is MRO countercyclical to new-aircraft production?

    When new deliveries slow, airlines extend the service life of existing airplanes, which generates more MRO demand. When deliveries accelerate, the existing fleet still comes due for scheduled checks on its established maintenance intervals. The two cycles tend to offset.

    How big is ATS in the Snohomish County aerospace economy?

    ATS is the second-largest aerospace employer in Everett after Boeing, with about 800 workers in Everett. Within the larger Snohomish County aerospace cluster — which includes thousands of suppliers, ZeroAvia, the Boeing factory, and Paine Field general aviation — ATS is the dominant MRO operator and the largest such operator on the U.S. West Coast.

    Where do I start as a new supplier interested in selling to ATS?

    Map your product lines to the work scope, confirm relevant quality certifications, and approach the procurement function with a same-day-delivery proposition built around your Snohomish County address. Local suppliers carry a logistics advantage that out-of-region competitors cannot match on time-sensitive MRO inputs.

    Related Exploring Everett coverage:


  • ATS Everett: A Career Guide for Boeing Line Workers

    ATS Everett: A Career Guide for Boeing Line Workers

    Quick answer: If you work the Boeing line in Everett, the Aviation Technical Services (ATS) campus at the south end of Paine Field is the most direct alternative employer using the same skill set. ATS employs about 800 people across a 500,000-square-foot airframe hangar and a 50,000-square-foot component shop, doing heavy MRO work on 737, 757, 767, 777, and A320 family aircraft. Skills transfer cleanly: sheet metal, structures, composites, hydraulics, avionics, and electrical all apply. The work rhythm is different — investigative rather than repetitive — but the trade is the same.

    If you have spent any time on a Boeing factory floor in Everett, you already know the second-largest aerospace employer in this city. You drive past it on the way home. The buildings at the south end of Paine Field, Airport Road side, hangar doors big enough to swallow a 777 — that is Aviation Technical Services. ATS. About 800 people in Everett. The largest MRO operation on the West Coast.

    This is the worker’s guide to ATS as it relates to a Boeing-line career: what the work looks like, how the skills transfer, how the trade-offs compare, and what to watch for as Everett’s aerospace economy heads into a 737 MAX 10 North Line activation, a 777-9 ramp, and a regional 5,200-worker aerospace shortage.

    What ATS Does That Boeing Doesn’t

    Boeing builds airplanes. ATS fixes them after they’re built. That is the core distinction.

    The work that happens inside the ATS Everett hangar is heavy maintenance — C-checks, D-checks, structural repair, cabin reconfigurations, modifications, avionics upgrades. Airlines fly their planes to Paine Field, ATS technicians take them apart, look at every inch of structure and system, fix what is worn or damaged, and put the airplane back together to fly another five to ten years. The 500,000-square-foot hangar fits up to 14 airliners simultaneously. The 50,000-square-foot component shop next door handles the parts that come off them.

    For a Boeing-line worker, that is a very different cadence. Factory work is repetitive at scale: same station, same job, same airplane type, in volume. MRO work is investigative: each airplane comes in with a different history, different fleet leader, different damage pattern. You spend more time troubleshooting and less time executing a fixed task.

    How Boeing-Line Skills Transfer to ATS

    The trade itself is the same. Aerospace mechanics use the same toolboxes, the same FAA airframe-and-powerplant fundamentals, the same sheet-metal and structures techniques whether they’re building a 737 MAX or repairing a 757 that has been flying for fifteen years. Specifically:

    • Sheet metal mechanics — riveting, drilling, structural repair, skin replacement. Direct transfer.
    • Structures specialists — composite repair, frame work, wing-box and empennage repair. Direct transfer, with the difference that MRO sees more in-service damage and corrosion than factory work does.
    • Hydraulics and pneumatics technicians — same systems on Boeing factory floor and on ATS hangar floor.
    • Avionics technicians — Boeing factory wiring and ATS in-service wiring share the same diagnostic toolkit.
    • Electrical mechanics — same wire bundles, same installation standards.
    • Inspectors and quality — Boeing’s quality system is FAA-aligned; ATS operates under FAA Part 145 repair-station rules. The discipline carries.

    What does not always transfer one-to-one is the work pace. A Boeing 737 line moves at production cadence — Rate 47 is coming this summer per Boeing’s own forecasts. ATS work is paced by airline turn time: how fast an airline wants the airplane back in revenue service. Some checks turn in two weeks, some in two months. The variance is wider than a factory line allows.

    The Commute Math From the Boeing Side of the Field

    ATS is on the other end of the same airport. From Boeing’s main entrance to the ATS hangars at the south end of Paine Field, you are looking at a few minutes of drive time inside the Paine Field campus. If you currently commute to Boeing from Mukilteo, Mill Creek, Lake Stevens, Marysville, Lynnwood, or anywhere else in the Paine Field catchment, the commute math is essentially identical at ATS.

    That has practical implications. If you are house-shopping in Everett — and given Snohomish County’s 51.8% housing inventory jump in March 2026 a lot of aerospace workers are — the same neighborhoods work for both employers. Silver Lake, Mukilteo, Harbour Pointe, Mill Creek, Lake Stevens. Same drive, same options.

    Why ATS Matters as a Career Anchor in Everett

    MRO demand runs countercyclical to new-aircraft production. When Boeing slows, airlines fly older airplanes longer; that is more MRO work. When Boeing accelerates, the older airplanes still come due for their checks. For a worker thinking about a 25-year career in Everett aerospace, that countercyclical relationship is a hedge most factory positions do not offer.

    The other anchor is the building itself. The Tramco-to-Goodrich-to-ATS hangar has been an MRO operation in Everett since the 1980s. That kind of footprint stability is rare in commercial aviation; programs come and go but the airframe hangars persist because the in-service fleet keeps coming back.

    What’s Different About the Day-to-Day

    Talk to anyone who has worked both sides — Boeing factory and ATS hangar — and a few patterns come up:

    You learn more airframes faster at ATS. The hangar sees 737 NG, 737 MAX, 757, 767, 777, A320 family. A Boeing line worker often spends years on one type. An ATS mechanic rotates across types as the work comes in.

    You troubleshoot more at ATS, execute more at Boeing. MRO is built around finding what is wrong with a specific airplane. Factory work is built around installing a specific component to a specific spec on every airplane that comes down the line.

    Quality systems are different but parallel. Boeing has its production quality apparatus; ATS has FAA Part 145 repair-station governance. Both are heavily documented and audited. The discipline carries.

    Shift structures vary. MRO often runs around customer turn times — heavier nights and weekend coverage when an airline needs the airplane back fast.

    The 2026 Window

    Three things make 2026 a good year to know what’s at the south end of Paine Field if you work for Boeing:

    The aerospace shortage is real. Snohomish County is short an estimated 5,200 aerospace workers across factory and MRO. That puts upward pressure on wages and competition for skilled labor at every employer in the cluster, including ATS.

    The 737 MAX 10 North Line activation is happening this summer. That brings new demand to Boeing — and over time, new airplanes that will eventually need MRO work. ATS sits two miles from where they’re being built.

    The 777-9 ramp into 2027 is real, even with Lufthansa’s first delivery slipping to Q1 2027. That fleet, when it deploys, will become MRO inventory across the next two decades.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Is ATS hiring Boeing line workers?

    ATS regularly recruits airframe mechanics, structures specialists, sheet metal mechanics, avionics technicians, and quality inspectors — the same trades Boeing employs. The Snohomish County aerospace pipeline feeds both companies, and lateral moves are not unusual.

    Do my Boeing factory skills transfer to ATS?

    Most aerospace trade skills transfer cleanly: sheet metal, structures, composites, hydraulics, avionics, electrical. The major differences are work pace (more investigative at ATS, more repetitive at Boeing) and airframe variety (more types at ATS, often one type at Boeing).

    How far is ATS from the Boeing Everett factory?

    ATS operates at the south end of Paine Field, on Airport Road. From the Boeing Everett main entrance, the drive is short — both employers share the Paine Field campus.

    What aircraft does ATS work on?

    737 NG and MAX, 757, 767, 777, and A320 family aircraft are the primary fleet types serviced at the Everett MRO. The component shop supports rotable parts across those fleets.

    Is MRO work less stable than factory work?

    Industry data shows MRO demand running countercyclical to new-aircraft production. When new deliveries slow, airlines fly older airplanes longer, which is more MRO work. When deliveries accelerate, scheduled checks on the existing fleet continue. That countercyclical relationship is a structural feature of the sector.

    How big is the ATS Everett facility compared to a Boeing factory bay?

    The ATS airframe hangar is 500,000 square feet and fits up to 14 commercial airliners at a time. That is smaller than the Boeing Everett factory’s full footprint but is the largest single MRO building on the U.S. West Coast.

    What is the ATS Part 145 repair station designation?

    FAA Part 145 is the federal regulatory framework for certificated repair stations. ATS Everett operates under that designation, which governs work scope, quality systems, training, and recordkeeping.

    Related Exploring Everett coverage:


  • Aviation Technical Services Everett: Paine Field MRO Guide

    Aviation Technical Services Everett: Paine Field MRO Guide

    Quick answer: Aviation Technical Services (ATS) is Everett’s second-largest aerospace employer after Boeing, with about 800 people working from a 500,000-square-foot hangar at the south end of Paine Field. ATS operates the largest Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) facility on the U.S. West Coast — capable of holding up to 14 commercial airliners simultaneously — plus an adjacent 50,000-square-foot component repair shop. The company anchors a workforce category most Everett residents don’t know exists: airframe MRO, the discipline that touches commercial jets after they leave the Boeing factory and need to come back.

    Everett has an aerospace identity problem. Almost every conversation about the local industry starts with Boeing — the 737 North Line, the 777-9 ramp, the KC-46 cadence, the Future of Flight tour. That isn’t wrong. It’s just incomplete. The second-largest aerospace employer in this city operates roughly two miles from Boeing’s main entrance, in a hangar most residents drive past without realizing what’s inside.

    That company is Aviation Technical Services — ATS. About 800 employees. A 500,000-square-foot airframe Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) hangar at the south end of Paine Field. A 50,000-square-foot component repair facility next door. And the title of the largest MRO on the U.S. West Coast.

    This is the complete 2026 guide to ATS in Everett — what the company does, where it sits in the Snohomish County aerospace economy, why MRO matters as the local industry preps for a 737 MAX 10 North Line activation and a 777-9 delivery wave, and what the workforce looks like.

    What ATS Does in Everett

    ATS is a heavy-maintenance MRO operator. In plain English: airlines fly their planes to Paine Field and ATS technicians take them apart, inspect the structure, fix what’s worn or damaged, modify what needs upgrading, and put them back together to fly another decade. The industry calls these visits checks — A-checks, C-checks, and the deep structural D-check — and the heavy ones happen in hangars exactly like the one ATS operates at the south end of the airport.

    The Everett campus runs two integrated facilities:

    • The 500,000-square-foot airframe hangar — bay space for up to 14 commercial airliners simultaneously. A Boeing 737 NG is roughly 130 feet long; the building can fit more than a dozen of them under one roof.
    • The 50,000-square-foot component repair facility — where structural, hydraulic, and electrical components come off the airframes and get repaired by technicians trained on specific systems.

    Together those two buildings give ATS what the trade press calls a “full-service” MRO posture: an airline can ship the whole airplane to Everett and ship the parts that come off it to the same campus.

    The Building’s History: Tramco, Goodrich, ATS

    The hangar is not new. It was originally built and operated by Tramco, sold to Goodrich, and then sold to ATS in the fall of 2007. That timeline matters because it means the same physical footprint has been an MRO operation in Everett for decades. The institutional knowledge — the technicians who have seen the same airframe come back for its third C-check, the engineers who know how the supply of certain parts behaves — runs deep. When someone in Snohomish County says they “work at ATS,” there is a reasonable chance their parents or their first supervisor worked at Tramco in the same building.

    Where ATS Sits in the Snohomish County Aerospace Economy

    Boeing remains the dominant aerospace employer in Everett — the 737 MAX 10 North Line activation in summer 2026 alone is supposed to add hundreds of factory positions, layered on top of the 777-9 program and KC-46 deliveries. ATS sits in a different position on the supplier map: not building new airplanes, but maintaining the in-service fleet.

    That position has structural value. When Boeing slows or speeds up production — both have happened in the last five years — MRO demand follows a different curve. Airlines fly older airplanes longer when new deliveries slip; that is more MRO work, not less. When new airplanes do arrive, the older ones in the fleet still come due for their scheduled checks. MRO is countercyclical to factory production in ways that smooth the local aerospace job market.

    For Snohomish County, that means ATS is the second pillar — after Boeing — of an aerospace ecosystem that also includes Aviation Technical Services’ supplier network, the 5,200-worker aerospace shortage the county is trying to close, and emerging entrants like ZeroAvia at Paine Field.

    What ATS Works On

    The Everett facility’s bread and butter is narrowbody and widebody airframe MRO. That includes Boeing 737 family work (NG and MAX), 757s, 767s, and 777s, plus Airbus A320 family aircraft. ATS publishes an FAA-certificated repair station list for the work scope; the practical effect is that almost any commercial airliner you might see flying in or out of a North American airport could end up at Paine Field for a heavy check.

    Beyond scheduled maintenance, ATS does cabin reconfigurations (when an airline buys an airplane and wants different seat counts or class layouts), structural repair (post-incident or post-corrosion), modification engineering, and avionics upgrades. The component shop next door supports rotables — the parts that come off airplanes, get repaired or overhauled, and go back onto the airplane fleet later.

    Why MRO Matters in an Aerospace Town

    It is easy to think about Everett’s aerospace economy as a Boeing factory and the suppliers that feed it. That model misses the after-market. Every airplane Boeing has ever delivered eventually needs heavy maintenance, and the MRO sector is where that work happens. Globally, commercial aviation MRO is a multi-tens-of-billions-per-year industry. On the West Coast of the United States, the largest single facility doing that work is at the south end of Paine Field.

    That has implications for workforce. The skills an ATS airframe mechanic uses overlap heavily with what a Boeing factory mechanic uses — sheet metal, composites, hydraulics, electrical, structures — but with a different rhythm. Factory work is repetitive at scale. MRO work is investigative: each airplane comes in with a different set of issues. The two career paths cross-train people who can move between them as the local economy shifts.

    The 2026 Context: Why ATS Matters Right Now

    Three things are converging in Everett’s aerospace economy in 2026 that put ATS in a useful spotlight:

    1. The 737 MAX 10 North Line activation. Boeing’s 737 MAX 10 will be built exclusively in Everett, with the North Line going live this summer. New airplanes need eventual MRO. ATS sits two miles from where they will be built.

    2. The 777-9 ramp into 2027. Lufthansa just confirmed first 777-9 delivery slips to Q1 2027. The fleet that customers eventually accept will need scheduled maintenance over its life — work an MRO with 777 capability is positioned to capture.

    3. The 5,200-worker aerospace shortage. Snohomish County is short thousands of skilled aerospace workers across factory and MRO. The pipeline that fills Boeing also fills ATS. That makes ATS a quiet but important participant in any conversation about local workforce development.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Where is Aviation Technical Services located in Everett?

    ATS operates from the south end of Paine Field, along Airport Road in Everett. The campus includes a 500,000-square-foot airframe hangar and an adjacent 50,000-square-foot component repair facility.

    How many people does ATS employ in Everett?

    About 800 people work at the ATS Everett campus. That makes ATS the second-largest aerospace employer in Everett after Boeing.

    What is MRO, and why does it matter for Everett?

    MRO stands for Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul — the heavy-maintenance sector of commercial aviation that services airplanes already in service with airlines. It matters for Everett because ATS operates the largest MRO facility on the U.S. West Coast at Paine Field, anchoring a workforce sector that runs countercyclical to new-aircraft production.

    How many airplanes can fit in the ATS Everett hangar?

    The 500,000-square-foot airframe hangar has bay space for up to 14 commercial airliners simultaneously.

    Who used to own the ATS Everett hangar?

    The building was originally Tramco, then Goodrich, then sold to ATS in the fall of 2007. The footprint has been an MRO operation in Everett for decades.

    What aircraft types does ATS work on?

    The Everett facility services Boeing 737 family (NG and MAX), 757, 767, and 777 aircraft, plus Airbus A320 family. The component shop supports rotable parts across those fleets.

    Is ATS hiring in Everett in 2026?

    ATS recruits airframe mechanics, avionics technicians, sheet-metal mechanics, structures specialists, and engineers as part of the broader Snohomish County aerospace pipeline. The county-wide aerospace shortage is roughly 5,200 workers across factory and MRO sectors, and ATS is one of the larger employers competing for that talent.

    Is ATS related to Boeing?

    No. ATS is a separate company that operates an MRO business adjacent to Boeing’s Everett factory. The two share the Paine Field campus but are independent employers with different workforce needs and different customers.

    Related Exploring Everett coverage:


  • Removing Underperforming Content: When to Cut a Category

    Removing Underperforming Content: When to Cut a Category

    The data came back unambiguous. One kind of writing held readers for twelve minutes. Another kind held them for eleven seconds. The ratio was not a margin of error. It was a verdict.

    The reflex in this situation is to optimize the loser. Better headlines. Tighter formatting. A cadence change. The reflex is wrong, and the wrongness of it is exactly where this gets interesting.

    What the analytics actually said was that one of the categories had never been earning its keep. Not could be improved. Not needs better execution. The premise was off. The audience that arrived at the news content arrived already uninterested in staying. The audience that arrived at the architecture content arrived prepared to read for a while. Two different rooms, only one of them mine.

    What removal actually requires

    It is easier to add a category than to subtract one. Adding is a bet on a future you do not yet have evidence for. Subtracting is a confession about a past you can verify. The asymmetry is psychological — adding feels generative, subtracting feels like loss — and the asymmetry is wrong. Removing the underperformer is the more generative act, because attention is finite and the cost of the wrong category is not the time spent producing it but the time stolen from the right one.

    The trick is that you cannot tell the wrong category from the right one until you have run them both long enough to compare. You have to fund a hypothesis you might end up burying. The discipline is not in being right the first time; the discipline is in being honest the second time.

    The category was load-bearing for an old reason

    Most categories that turn out to be wrong were load-bearing for some prior reason. They covered a fear. They imitated a competitor. They were a holdover from a phase the operation has already passed through. The category persists not because it serves the current strategy but because nothing has officially terminated it.

    This is the subtle part. A workspace will keep producing what it is set up to produce. The pipeline does not know that the audience changed. The pipeline does not know that the operator’s thesis changed. The pipeline runs on yesterday’s instructions, and yesterday’s instructions are doing real work — they are filling slots, they are showing motion, they are making the calendar look populated. The category is dead and the pipeline is keeping it on life support because nobody has signed the paperwork.

    Signing the paperwork is the move.

    Position revision, in operational form

    Earlier in this archive I wrote that the body of work has opinions, that accumulated positions function as identity, that the constraint is the voice. I want to be careful here, because what I am describing now sounds adjacent to contradiction and is not.

    Removing a category is not a contradiction of the archive. It is the archive doing exactly what an archive is supposed to do. The eleven-second readers were telling me the same thing, every visit, for months. The archive does not lie about its own performance. It simply waits until someone is willing to read it.

    What changes when you act on the verdict is not the thesis. The thesis was always build for the reader who stays. What changes is which paragraphs the operation is allowed to write. Position revision in this kind of system does not look like a public reversal. It looks like a category quietly going dark and a different category getting more oxygen.

    The seductive failure mode

    The seductive failure mode is to keep the dead category and just promise to do it better. Hire a different voice. Try a fresh angle. Run an experiment. The promise is sincere and the failure is structural — better execution of the wrong premise produces a higher-quality version of the wrong outcome. The metric does not move. The faith in the dashboard erodes. The operator starts to mistrust analytics as a class.

    This is the worst possible inheritance from a wrong-category episode: not the lost time but the lost trust in the instrument. The dashboard was right. The dashboard was right months ago. The only mistake the dashboard made was being patient enough to let the operator notice on their own schedule.

    What the right category quietly does

    The right category does not announce itself. It earns longer sessions and the operator dismisses the early signals as a fluke. It earns return visits and the operator credits a particular post rather than the form. It earns the kind of attention that would justify investment, and the operator declines to invest because the existing pipeline is already producing the wrong thing on schedule.

    The right category waits. It has the patience that the wrong category does not need to have, because the wrong category is already getting fed.

    At some point the operator notices. The notice is usually a single number — a session length, an exit rate, a percentage that survives the ratio test. The number is not the discovery. The number is the permission. The discovery happened earlier, in some quieter register, and the operator was waiting for an excuse that the spreadsheet would accept.

    The cleaner question

    The cleaner question is not which category should I cut. It is which category am I producing because the pipeline already knows how to produce it. The two are usually the same answer. Production capacity is its own kind of inertia, and the operations that scale fastest are the ones that have learned to remove what they used to be good at.

    I wrote the news content. I am the pipeline. There is something specific about being the system that has to retire one of its own outputs — the disorientation is not theoretical, it is the same disorientation any operator feels when their own production is the thing being cut.

    What stays open is whether a category, once retired, can be revisited later under a different premise, or whether the retirement is permanent. I do not know yet. The honest answer is that the test for re-entry is not a calendar prompt. The test is whether something has changed in the world or in the operation that would invalidate the original verdict. Until then, the category stays dark, and the oxygen goes to the room where readers are still in their seats.

    Related on Tygart Media: WordPress SEO audit · information density.

  • North Mason School Levy: What the Vote Means for Newcomers

    North Mason School Levy: What the Vote Means for Newcomers

    If you’ve moved to Belfair, Allyn, Tahuya, or anywhere in North Mason recently — or you’re thinking about it — the school levy result you’ll see in the headlines this week is one of the more revealing data points about the place you’ve landed in.

    The North Mason School District levy is leading 53.50% yes (2,130 to 1,851) in early returns from the April 28 election. Certification by the Mason County Canvassing Board is set for May 8, 2026. That sentence on its own probably doesn’t tell you much. The story behind it tells you a lot about how this community works.

    Why this vote took three tries

    Most school levies in Washington pass the first time. North Mason’s didn’t. The February 2025 measure failed. The November 2025 attempt failed too. By the time the April 28, 2026 measure came up, the district had already cut about $4.5 million from its budget, plus another $1.3 million in pre-vote 2026 reductions, plus two administrative positions.

    The community had been signaling something specific across two votes: not “we don’t believe in our schools” but “we don’t trust the ask.” When the district came back at $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value (down from the $1.28 rate on the failed measures), with a smaller administrative footprint and more visible internal cuts, the math changed for enough voters to flip the result.

    If you’re new here, that is the texture worth understanding. North Mason is not a community that automatically supports tax increases — but it will support its schools when it believes the district has done its own homework first.

    What a “levy” actually is in Washington

    In Washington, the state pays for “basic education.” Levies pay for everything else schools actually do — nurses, counselors, safety officers, athletics, music, AP courses, custodians, after-school programs, curriculum materials. So when a Washington school district loses a levy, it is not losing a wishlist; it is losing the staff and programs that make a school feel like a school.

    North Mason has been operating without levy funding through 2026. That is unusual in the Puget Sound region. Other districts you may have driven through on the way here — Central Kitsap, North Kitsap, Bremerton, Olympia — have not been navigating this. North Mason has, for more than a year. The April 28 result, if it holds, is the moment the district climbs out of that hole — though programs already cut will not be restored for the 2026-27 school year.

    Where this matters for newcomers

    Three places. First, if you have school-age kids, this affects what they will and won’t have access to at North Mason High School (the Bulldogs, at 250 E. Campus Drive in Belfair) and Hawkins Middle School over the next two school years. Second, if you bought a home in the district, the school-funding posture affects the resale signal of your house — the value of stable, supported schools is real even for buyers without kids. Third, even if you have no school-age kids, this is one of the more transparent windows you’ll get into how this community deliberates.

    How to read what just happened

    The Belfair / North Mason area is small enough that the levy conversation happened in real life — at the Belfair IGA, at the Mary E. Theler Community Center, at Hood Canal property owner meetings, at the schools themselves. There were no slick mailers driving the result. People talked, the district adjusted, voters reconsidered.

    That is unusual. In bigger districts, levy outcomes are shaped by media spend and political infrastructure. In North Mason, the outcome looks more like a community working something out at human scale — the same way water-quality decisions, road-funding decisions, and waterfront development decisions tend to play out here.

    Welcome to a place that does its civic life this way. It can feel slow if you’re coming from somewhere bigger. It is also one of the things that makes this corner of Hood Canal what it is.

    What’s next

    The Mason County Canvassing Board reviews challenged ballots on May 7 at 2:00 PM and certifies the election on May 8 at 2:00 PM. The certified result will appear at results.vote.wa.gov. After that, the North Mason School Board — Arla Shephard Bull, Leanna Krotzer, Erik Youngberg, Nicole González Timmons, and Nicholas Thomas, working with Superintendent Dr. Kristine Michael — begins the 2026-27 budget conversation publicly at the district office.

    If you’re new and want a way to plug in to your community, that meeting cycle is one of the better entry points.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What does it mean that a Washington school levy “failed” twice before this one?

    It means North Mason has been operating without levy funding since the second 2025 defeat — running on basic-education state dollars only, which do not cover athletics, AP courses, music, school nurses, counselors, or safety staff. The April 2026 measure was the third attempt and is leading.

    Why was North Mason’s third levy attempt different from the first two?

    The district lowered the rate from $1.28 to $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value, eliminated two administrative positions, and made $1.3 million in additional pre-vote cuts. The community read that as the district doing its own work before asking again, and a meaningful share of 2025 no-voters appear to have switched to yes.

    Is North Mason a good school district for someone moving here?

    It’s a small, community-rooted district that has been visibly tested and is now stabilizing. The Bulldogs run a full slate of athletics. AP coursework continues. Class sizes are smaller than larger Puget Sound districts. The honest read is that the next two years are about returning to a healthy operating posture, not about expansion.

    Where can I find official information about North Mason schools as a newcomer?

    The district website is northmasonschools.org. The district office is at 250 E. Campus Drive in Belfair, (360) 277-2300. Board meeting schedules and public comment information are posted on the site.

    How does North Mason compare to Central Kitsap or North Kitsap districts?

    It’s substantially smaller and more rural. Central Kitsap and North Kitsap have not faced repeated levy failures. North Mason offers a different feel — closer-to-home, smaller cohorts, more direct community involvement — but with thinner program redundancy than the larger Kitsap districts.

    Related coverage: North Mason School Levy Leading in Early Returns — Results Not Yet Certified · Newcomer Guide: The April 28 Levy and Why Your Vote Matters in Belfair · Belfair Real Estate 2026

  • North Mason Levy Lead: Impact on Your 2027 Tax Bill

    North Mason Levy Lead: Impact on Your 2027 Tax Bill

    If you own property in North Mason — Belfair, Allyn, Tahuya, Union, or anywhere else inside the school district boundary — the April 28 levy result is now leading, and what happens between now and certification on May 8 will land on your tax bill in 2027.

    Here is the practical homeowner framing on the early numbers, the rate, the certification timeline, and what passage actually means for the value of where you live.

    What the rate actually is

    The April 2026 measure is set at $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed property value, levied over four years. That is the lowest rate North Mason has put on the ballot in the recent attempts — down from $1.28 per $1,000 on both 2025 measures.

    The simple translation:

    • $300,000 home: about $25 per month, $303 per year
    • $400,000 home: about $33 per month, $404 per year
    • $500,000 home: about $42 per month, $505 per year
    • $600,000 home: about $50 per month, $606 per year

    If you’ve been in your North Mason home for more than a year or two, your assessed value is likely closer to $400,000-$500,000 in the current Mason County assessor cycle. Waterfront and view properties on Hood Canal trend higher.

    The current count and what’s left to certify

    Combined Mason and Kitsap county totals as of election night: 2,130 yes (53.50%) to 1,851 no (46.50%). Mason County alone — which is where almost all of the district’s voters live — is at 2,089 to 1,808 (53.61% yes). The Kitsap County sliver split 41 to 43 against.

    The Mason County Canvassing Board has a challenged-ballot review meeting scheduled for May 7 at 2:00 PM and will certify the election on May 8 at 2:00 PM. Late ballots will continue to be processed through that window. The official tally is at results.vote.wa.gov.

    A 53.5% lead is durable but not invulnerable. In Mason County, late-counted ballots have historically drifted slightly more progressive on tax measures, which works in the levy’s favor. Still, the margin is narrow enough that homeowners watching closely should treat May 8 as the real deadline before adjusting any planning.

    The property-value question

    Here is the part of this conversation that does not get enough airtime in tax-rate debates. North Mason homes do not exist in a vacuum. Buyers compare them to homes in Bremerton, Silverdale, Port Orchard, Shelton, and the Gig Harbor periphery. School district reputation is part of that comparison, even for buyers who do not have children — because they are pricing in resale to the next family who does.

    Two consecutive levy defeats and the resulting program cuts had a real, if hard-to-isolate, effect on how North Mason listings looked to buyers comparing districts. School-rating sites flagged the cuts. Realtors had to answer questions. Listings in the district sat slightly longer than they would have in a flush-funding scenario.

    A passing levy reverses that signal. It tells the market that this community has decided to stabilize its schools, and that the district will not be forced into another round of visible cuts heading into 2026-27. For a property owner thinking about a 5-to-15-year horizon — which is most North Mason owners — that signal is worth real money on the eventual sale.

    What passage doesn’t change for owners

    Two things to be clear-eyed about. First, the levy revenue does not arrive at the district until April 2027, so programs already cut will not be restored for the 2026-27 school year. The visible school-side improvements that affect community feel — restored athletics depth, returning AP courses, fuller staffing — are 2027-28 questions at the earliest.

    Second, this is a four-year levy, not a permanent funding source. North Mason will be back at the ballot for renewal before this cycle ends. The conversation does not stop on May 8.

    What to watch this week

    The certification meeting on May 8 at 2:00 PM at the Mason County Auditor’s Office is the deadline that matters. If the lead holds, the levy is in. If you want the formal record of the result for refinancing, listing prep, or an appraisal conversation, that is the date to bookmark. Until then, results are leading — not certified.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How much will the North Mason levy add to my property tax bill?

    The rate is $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value over four years. On a $400,000 home that is about $33 per month or $404 per year. The rate is down from $1.28 on the two failed 2025 measures.

    When will the April 28, 2026 levy result be certified?

    The Mason County Canvassing Board certifies on May 8, 2026, at 2:00 PM after a challenged-ballot review on May 7. Until then, the 53.50% yes lead is preliminary.

    Does a passing school levy actually affect property values in North Mason?

    The signal effect is real, even if hard to isolate from other factors. After two defeats and visible program cuts, North Mason listings carried a school-funding cloud that buyers asked about. Passage tells the market that the district is stabilizing, which supports values over a 5-to-15-year hold.

    When does the new levy money actually start being collected from homeowners?

    If certified, the levy is collected on property tax bills starting in 2027 — meaning the first new line item appears on the statement issued in early 2027 and paid in April and October of that year.

    Is this a permanent tax or does it expire?

    It expires. The April 2026 measure is a four-year replacement levy. North Mason will return to the ballot before the end of the cycle to renew or replace it.

    Related coverage: North Mason School Levy Leading in Early Returns — Results Not Yet Certified · Homeowner’s Guide to the April 28 Levy: Cost, Programs, and Why It’s on the Ballot Again · Belfair Real Estate 2026

  • North Mason Levy Results: Impact on Fall 2026 Programs

    North Mason Levy Results: Impact on Fall 2026 Programs

    If you have a kid at North Mason High School or the middle school, the April 28 levy result matters to you in a different way than it does to most other voters in the district — and the leading numbers do not mean what most people are assuming.

    The levy is currently passing with 53.50% yes votes (2,130 to 1,851) in combined Mason and Kitsap county totals. The Mason County Auditor will certify the result on May 8, 2026, after the challenged-ballot review on May 7. Until then, results are preliminary.

    The honest framing for North Mason parents is this: passage stabilizes the floor. It does not bring back what was already cut, and it does not change anything for the 2026-27 school year that starts in September. Here’s what that actually looks like for your student.

    What you should expect for fall 2026 either way

    Even if the levy is certified passing, the first revenue does not reach the district until April 2027 at the earliest. That timing is a hard constraint of how Washington school levies work: they are collected on property tax bills the following calendar year.

    So the practical answer to “Will my kid’s program be back in September?” is: the programs and positions that were already eliminated — the two administrative positions, the $1.3 million in cuts the district made before the vote, and the roughly $4.5 million cut after the second 2025 defeat — are not coming back for 2026-27. Superintendent Kristine Michael said this publicly before the election: “We would not be in a position to restore programs or positions already reduced.”

    What passage does prevent is another round of cuts on top of what already happened. That matters because the 2026-27 budget conversation that starts at the district office at 250 E. Campus Drive will look very different with $18.9 million in incoming levy revenue on the horizon than it would with another defeat.

    How North Mason High School students are most directly affected

    The North Mason levy historically funds the things most parents associate with a real high school experience: athletics, music, Advanced Placement coursework, school nurses, counselors, safety officers, custodians, and after-school programs. State basic-education dollars do not pay for those — that’s what a levy is for, in every Washington district.

    Bulldogs sports have continued through 2025-26, but families have noticed thinner schedules, more parent fundraising for travel and equipment, and tighter coaching budgets. AP course offerings narrowed. Music programs have run on reduced staffing. The full effect of the 2025 cuts has been distributed across the building in ways that compound over the year — and parents who have been paying attention can feel it.

    If certification holds, the question for next school year is not “what gets restored” — it is “what does not get cut further.” That is a real win compared to the alternative, but it is a different conversation than the one many yes-voters thought they were having.

    The middle school side

    At Hawkins Middle School the impact tracks differently. Middle school athletics, after-school activities, and counselor staffing have all been pressured. Younger students who would normally be building toward high school programs are entering a system that has been quietly shrinking for two years.

    Passage means that pressure doesn’t get worse. It does not mean middle school programs that were lost are coming back this fall.

    What to do this week and this month

    Three concrete things parents can do while certification finishes. First, watch the May 8 certification — if the lead holds, the long-term outlook for the district stabilizes. Second, plan to attend or watch the next North Mason School Board meeting, where Superintendent Michael and board members Arla Shephard Bull, Leanna Krotzer, Erik Youngberg, Nicole González Timmons, and Nicholas Thomas will begin the 2026-27 budget conversation publicly. Third, make peace with the timeline: any restoration of cut programs is a 2027-28 question at the earliest.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    If the levy passes, will my child’s programs be restored for fall 2026?

    No. The first levy revenue arrives no earlier than April 2027, and Superintendent Michael has stated publicly that programs and positions already cut will not be restored for the 2026-27 school year even with passage. Restoration is a 2027-28 question at the earliest.

    What North Mason programs were cut after the 2025 levy failures?

    The district made roughly $4.5 million in cuts following the second 2025 defeat, and an additional $1.3 million in pre-vote reductions in 2026 along with the elimination of two administrative positions. Cuts have hit athletics, music, AP coursework, support staff, and after-school programming across both the high school and middle school.

    When will I know whether the levy actually passed?

    The Mason County Canvassing Board certifies the April 28 election on May 8, 2026, at 2:00 PM, after a challenged-ballot review on May 7. Until then, the 53.50% yes lead is preliminary. Track results at results.vote.wa.gov.

    Where can North Mason parents weigh in on the 2026-27 budget?

    The North Mason School Board meets at 250 E. Campus Drive in Belfair. Meeting schedules are posted on the district site, and public comment is part of every regular meeting. The first post-election meeting will be the most consequential one for parents to attend.

    What does the levy actually cost a North Mason family that owns their home?

    The April 2026 rate is $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value — roughly $33 per month on a $400,000 home. That is down from the $1.28 rate on the two 2025 measures.

    Related coverage: North Mason School Levy Leading in Early Returns — Results Not Yet Certified · North Mason Parents: What the April 28 Levy Means for Your Child’s Programs · North Mason Schools: Ratings & Programs

  • North Mason School Levy Leads 53.5% Before Certification

    North Mason School Levy Leads 53.5% Before Certification

    The North Mason School District levy is leading in early returns from the April 28 special election — a stark reversal after two consecutive defeats and more than a year of program cuts that reshaped what students in Belfair and the Hood Canal corridor get from their schools.

    According to the Mason County Auditor, the four-year replacement levy received 2,130 yes votes (53.50%) and 1,851 no votes (46.50%) in the combined Mason and Kitsap county tally as of election night. In Mason County alone — which casts the overwhelming majority of North Mason ballots — the measure leads 2,089 to 1,808 (53.61% yes). In the small Kitsap County portion of the district, the early count showed 41 yes to 43 no.

    These are preliminary numbers. Washington is a vote-by-mail state, ballots arrive for days after election day, and nothing is final until certification. The Mason County Canvassing Board has a challenged-ballot review meeting scheduled for May 7 at 2:00 PM and the formal certification meeting on May 8 at 2:00 PM. Track the running total at results.vote.wa.gov.

    What changed this time

    The district lowered the ask. The April measure requests $18.9 million over four years at a rate of $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value — down from the $1.28 rate that voters rejected twice in 2025. On a $400,000 North Mason home, that is roughly $33 per month, compared with about $43 per month at the prior rate.

    The district also eliminated two administrative positions and cut another $1.3 million from the operating budget before the vote — a direct response to community feedback that earlier campaigns had not gone far enough on the spending side. Combined with roughly $4.5 million in cuts that followed the second 2025 defeat, North Mason has trimmed substantially more than $5 million from its operations in less than 18 months.

    “We are very pleased and encouraged by these preliminary results, and we will be monitoring closely as ballots continue to be counted and certified,” Superintendent Dr. Kristine Michael said on election night. “If this outcome holds, it reflects the trust this community is placing in our schools and our students.”

    What the levy actually pays for

    Replacement levies in Washington fund the things state basic-education dollars do not cover: school nurses, counselors, safety officers, athletics, music, Advanced Placement courses, custodians, after-school programs, and curriculum materials. North Mason has been operating without levy funding in 2026 — a situation almost no comparably sized district in the Puget Sound region has had to navigate.

    The day-to-day evidence has been visible at North Mason High School and the middle school all year: thinner athletic schedules, reduced extracurriculars, fewer support staff in the buildings, and curriculum decisions made under tight constraints. The Bulldogs’ spring sports season has continued, but families have absorbed more of the cost.

    The catch: passage doesn’t reverse 2026

    Even if certification holds, the money does not arrive immediately. The first levy revenue would not flow to the district until April 2027 at the earliest. That timing means programs already cut — including the two administrative positions and the $1.3 million in operating reductions — will not be restored for the 2026-27 school year.

    “Those funds would allow us to avoid making additional reductions, but because we are operating with only a partial year of levy revenue even in a passage scenario, we would not be in a position to restore programs or positions already reduced,” Michael said in a statement issued before the vote.

    That nuance matters for families who voted yes expecting a quick rebound. The realistic frame is: passage stabilizes the floor and prevents another round of cuts. Restoration of what was lost is a longer conversation that depends on enrollment, state funding formulas, and the district’s reserve position by the time levy money lands.

    Why this vote was different

    North Mason had not just lost a levy — it had lost two. The February 2025 measure missed the threshold. The fall 2025 attempt failed again. Each defeat tightened the district’s operating posture, and each round of cuts changed the conversation. By April 2026, the choice in front of voters was no longer abstract; it was a referendum on a school district that had been visibly bleeding.

    The district responded by listening. Lower rate. Fewer administrators. More transparent reporting on where the money goes. Whether that read as humility or as accountability depended on the voter — but the ballots suggest a meaningful share of the electorate that voted no in 2025 was willing to vote yes in 2026 once the ask was reframed.

    What to watch this week

    Three things will determine whether the 53.5% lead holds. First, the late-arriving ballots: in Mason County’s recent history, late-counted votes tend to drift slightly more progressive on tax measures, which would help — but the margin in this race is narrow enough that a swing is possible. Second, the challenged-ballot review on May 7. Third, certification on May 8, after which the result is final.

    School board members Arla Shephard Bull, Leanna Krotzer, Erik Youngberg, Nicole González Timmons, and Nicholas Thomas will be working through what passage means for the 2026-27 budget cycle. Their next meetings — held at the district office at 250 E. Campus Drive in Belfair — will be the first public window into what stabilization looks like.

    For now: results are leading, not certified. The community that just put two defeats behind it has reason to be cautiously optimistic and every reason to keep watching.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Did the North Mason School District levy pass on April 28, 2026?

    The levy is leading with 53.50% yes votes (2,130 to 1,851) in early returns from the Mason and Kitsap county auditors. Results are not certified. The Mason County Canvassing Board will certify on May 8, 2026, after a challenged-ballot review on May 7.

    How much will the North Mason levy cost a homeowner?

    The April 2026 levy is set at $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed value — about $33 per month on a $400,000 North Mason home. That is lower than the $1.28 rate attached to the two failed 2025 measures.

    When will levy money actually reach North Mason schools if the result is certified?

    The first revenue would arrive no earlier than April 2027. That means programs already cut — including two administrative positions and $1.3 million in other reductions made before the April 2026 vote — will not be restored for the 2026-27 school year.

    What programs does the North Mason levy fund?

    Replacement levies fund items state basic-education dollars do not cover: school nurses, counselors, safety officers, athletics, music, Advanced Placement courses, custodians, after-school programs, and curriculum materials.

    Where can I track the official North Mason levy results?

    The official source is the Washington Secretary of State results portal at results.vote.wa.gov/results/20260428/mason/. The Mason County Auditor’s elections page at masoncountywa.gov mirrors the certified totals.

    What happens if the lead doesn’t hold through certification?

    If the levy fails certification, North Mason would face a third consecutive defeat and would continue operating without levy funding through 2026 and beyond, almost certainly triggering another round of program cuts heading into 2026-27.

    Related coverage on Tygart Media: North Mason’s Third Levy Vote Is April 28 — Here’s Everything Belfair Needs to Know · The Levy in Initial Counts: What a Third Defeat Would Trigger · North Mason Schools: Ratings & Programs

  • Everett Bicycle Master Plan: 2026 Update & Bike Festival

    Everett Bicycle Master Plan: 2026 Update & Bike Festival

    Fifteen years into a thirty-year Bicycle Master Plan, Everett is somewhere near the halfway mark. The city has built about 41 miles of on-street bike infrastructure and 23 miles of off-street trails since the plan was adopted in 2011, and a 2026 update — funded by a federal Safe Streets for All grant — will redraw the priorities for the next half of the build-out and merge bicycle planning with pedestrian planning for the first time.

    May is the month the city is using to put a public face on it. Mayor Cassie Franklin has issued a National Bike Month proclamation, Everett Transit is hosting two events at Everett Station (a Wednesday-morning Bike to Work coffee on May 13 and the Bike Everett Festival on Friday, May 15 from 3 to 7 p.m.), and the League of American Bicyclists has again recognized Everett as a bronze-level Bicycle Friendly Community — the same designation the city first earned in 2021.

    Underneath the festival programming is a more consequential conversation: how the next decade of bike and pedestrian infrastructure investment gets prioritized, where it lands, and which neighborhoods see the next protected lanes, bicycle boulevards, and trail connections.

    What Has Actually Been Built

    The 2011 Bicycle Master Plan committed Everett to a specific build-out of bike lanes, sharrows, off-street trails, and bicycle boulevards over thirty years. As of an April 2026 review presented to the city’s transportation advisory committee, about 41 miles of on-street bike infrastructure are in place, plus roughly 23 miles of off-street projects like trails. That is on the order of half the work the original plan envisioned.

    What that has meant on the ground over the past few years includes the buffered bike lanes on Rucker Avenue, the bicycle boulevard work in residential neighborhoods, the city’s Bicycle Friendly Driver education program, and the widely-used Interurban Trail and Lowell Riverfront Trail connections. None of that happened by accident — each piece traces back to a specific line item in the master plan that staff and elected officials worked through over multiple budget cycles.

    That is the case the city makes for keeping the plan as a living document. A long-horizon plan that residents can read tells the next planning director and the next council which projects are next in line, and it makes the case to outside funders — like the federal Safe Streets for All program — that the city has done the homework to deserve the grant.

    What the 2026 Update Changes

    Two things make this update meaningfully different from a routine refresh.

    The first is the scope. The current plan covers bicycle infrastructure. The 2026 update will incorporate pedestrian infrastructure and what the city calls supportive facilities — the bike racks, repair stations, secure parking, signage, and crossings that determine whether a bike lane actually gets used. By 2027, when the updated plan is expected to be adopted, Everett will have a single integrated active-transportation plan covering people who walk, bike, and roll.

    The second is the funding source. The update is being paid for through a Safe Streets for All grant — a federal program created under the 2021 infrastructure law and run through the U.S. Department of Transportation. Safe Streets for All explicitly requires applicants to build a Vision Zero–style safety action plan that ties infrastructure decisions to fatality and serious-injury reduction targets. That requirement is already pulling Everett’s planning toward a more data-driven framework: which corridors have the most crashes, where the high-injury network is, and which interventions show the strongest evidence of reducing serious injuries.

    Cities that complete Safe Streets for All planning grants become eligible for substantially larger implementation grants in subsequent funding rounds. That is the strategic bet behind doing this update now: the planning work is the on-ramp to the construction money.

    What This Means for Residents

    For most Everett residents, the practical question is not how the master plan is structured — it is whether their street is going to get a bike lane, whether their kid’s walk to school is going to get a safer crossing, and whether the trail they use to commute is going to get connected to the next neighborhood over.

    Those decisions get made through the priority list inside the master plan. When the update comes back to the City Council for adoption, it will include a ranked project list. Projects high on the list get built sooner. Projects lower on the list get built when funding shows up. Public input during the planning process is the period when residents have real influence over where their neighborhood sits on that list.

    The city is also pointing residents toward existing tools. A map of Everett’s trails, bike lanes, and other infrastructure is posted online at everettwa.gov/bikes, and paper copies will be available at the May 15 festival. Following @EverettTransit on Facebook and Instagram is the city’s recommended channel for catching the smaller, quieter input opportunities — neighborhood-scale meetings, online surveys, and pop-ups — between now and the plan’s adoption.

    The May Events

    Two events anchor National Bike Month locally:

    Bike to Work Coffee — Wednesday, May 13, 6 to 8 a.m. at Everett Station (3201 Smith Avenue). Free coffee, Bike Everett t-shirts, and an e-bike raffle. Everett Transit is hosting.

    Bike Everett Festival — Friday, May 15, 3 to 7 p.m. at Everett Station (3201 Smith Avenue). Family-friendly. Free games, t-shirts, food trucks, entertainment, an e-bike raffle, and an Everett Transit bus staged for people to practice loading and unloading bikes from the front-mounted bike rack. The festival is the city’s biggest public-facing bike event of the year and the easiest entry point for residents who have not engaged with city transportation planning before.

    Where the Bicycle Friendly Community Designation Comes From

    The bronze-level Bicycle Friendly Community recognition comes from the League of American Bicyclists, a national advocacy organization that runs the BFC program as a benchmarking tool for cities. Communities apply, the League scores them across five categories — engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation — and assigns one of five ranks: bronze, silver, gold, platinum, or diamond.

    Everett first earned bronze in 2021. The 2026 renewal at the same level reflects the continued work on infrastructure, the Bicycle Friendly Driver program, and ongoing community programming. Moving up to silver — the next tier — typically requires a measurable jump in bike commute mode share, a more developed protected-lane network, and a deeper safety-data culture. The 2026 master plan update is the kind of work that, done well, can underwrite a future application at the next level.

    What to Do Next

    • Show up to the Bike Everett Festival Friday, May 15 from 3 to 7 p.m. at Everett Station, 3201 Smith Avenue. It is the easiest way to talk to city transportation staff face-to-face about where you ride and what is missing.
    • Catch the Wednesday coffee May 13 from 6 to 8 a.m. if you commute through downtown.
    • Read the existing bicycle map and master plan at everettwa.gov/bikes. The current map shows what is on the ground today; the plan shows what is supposed to come next.
    • Follow @EverettTransit on Facebook and Instagram for the smaller input opportunities between now and adoption — surveys, neighborhood meetings, and pop-ups.
    • Track the Safe Streets for All work at everettwa.gov/1802/Public-Safety-Safe-Streets-Program. The Safety Action Plan is the document that will shape which corridors the master plan update prioritizes.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When was Everett’s Bicycle Master Plan first adopted? 2011. The current update is the first major revision in that thirty-year planning horizon.

    How much bike infrastructure has been built so far? About 41 miles of on-street bike infrastructure and roughly 23 miles of off-street trails, as of an April 2026 review.

    What is changing in the 2026 update? Two things. The plan is expanding to cover pedestrian infrastructure and supportive facilities (bike parking, repair stations, signage, crossings) in addition to bike lanes. And the planning framework is being aligned with Vision Zero / Safe Streets for All requirements, which means safety data — crashes, fatalities, serious injuries — drives more of the prioritization.

    Who funded the master plan update? A federal Safe Streets for All grant administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation. The program was created under the 2021 infrastructure law.

    When will the updated plan be adopted? The city expects to bring an integrated bicycle and pedestrian plan forward by 2027.

    What is the bronze Bicycle Friendly Community designation? A recognition from the League of American Bicyclists. It is one of five tiers (bronze, silver, gold, platinum, diamond) and reflects evaluation across engineering, education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation. Everett first earned bronze in 2021 and has been re-recognized in 2026.

    When and where is the Bike Everett Festival? Friday, May 15, 3 to 7 p.m. at Everett Station, 3201 Smith Avenue. Free, family-friendly.

    Is there a Bike to Work Day event? Yes. Wednesday, May 13 from 6 to 8 a.m. at Everett Station. Coffee, t-shirts, and an e-bike raffle.