Why did Everett turn its Flock license plate cameras back on? On April 22, 2026, the City of Everett confirmed it had reactivated its network of 68 Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras after Governor Bob Ferguson signed Senate Bill 6002 on March 30, 2026. The new state law — the Driver Privacy Act — exempts ALPR footage from the Public Records Act, which had led a Snohomish County judge to rule in February that Everett’s footage was public record and forced the city to pause the network. Most of Everett’s cameras came back online April 7, though a Superior Court hearing on May 14 will test whether the earlier ruling stands.

What just happened with Everett’s Flock camera network

On Tuesday, April 22, 2026, the City of Everett confirmed that its network of automated license plate reader cameras operated by Flock Safety has been reactivated. The cameras had been paused since February after a Snohomish County Superior Court judge ruled that Everett’s ALPR footage qualified as a public record under the state Public Records Act.

According to city officials, Mayor Cassie Franklin directed the Everett Police Department to restart the cameras in early April. Most of the network was back online by April 7, 2026, according to the city. The city filed a motion in Snohomish County Superior Court on April 3 asking the judge to vacate the February ruling in light of a new state law signed just days earlier.

The state law that changed the picture

On March 30, 2026, Governor Bob Ferguson signed Senate Bill 6002, known as the Driver Privacy Act. The law explicitly exempts ALPR footage from Washington’s Public Records Act. That single change reshaped the legal footing for every Washington city operating — or considering — a Flock network.

SB 6002 also includes new guardrails that apply to every ALPR network in the state. According to the final bill text:

• Agencies can retain ALPR data for no more than 21 days.
• ALPR use is limited to specific categories of investigation.
• Sharing data with federal agencies is prohibited.
• ALPR collection is restricted near schools and health care facilities.

The law’s stated purpose is to balance law enforcement access to license plate data with driver privacy — especially for people who might be targeted if their movements became discoverable through a public records request. The ACLU of Washington has objected to the law’s 21-day retention period, calling the provision unacceptable; the organization says the original version of the legislation contemplated a 72-hour retention window.

What Everett Police say the cameras have done

Everett launched its Flock network in October 2024 under a two-year, $550,000 grant-funded contract signed in June 2024. The city operates 68 ALPR cameras across Everett.

According to Everett Police, in the months between the October 2024 launch and the February 2026 pause the cameras were used in more than 250 arrests, along with stolen vehicle recoveries and missing-person locates. The city points to those numbers as the case for bringing the cameras back.

City spokesperson Simone Tarver addressed the restart directly. “This new state law ensures that we can protect the privacy of residents — including victims of domestic violence, harassment, and stalking — from anyone who may have had the intention of misusing this information,” Tarver said. She added that “the strategic and responsible use of technology remains a priority for the City.”

How Everett got here: a 6-month timeline

The Everett Flock story has moved quickly through the courts and the Legislature. Here is the sequence of events, drawn from court filings, city statements, and state records:

• October 2024: Everett launches 68-camera Flock network.
• February 2026: A Snohomish County Superior Court judge rules that ALPR footage is public record. Everett pauses its network.
• March 5, 2026: Everett files an appeal of the public records ruling.
• March 30, 2026: Governor Ferguson signs SB 6002 (the Driver Privacy Act).
• Early April 2026: Mayor Franklin directs EPD to reactivate cameras.
• April 3, 2026: Everett files a motion in Superior Court to vacate the February ruling.
• April 7, 2026: Most of Everett’s cameras are back online.
• April 22, 2026: The city publicly confirms the reactivation.
• May 14, 2026: Hearing scheduled on Everett’s motion to vacate.

The May 14 hearing is the next legal checkpoint. If the court grants the motion to vacate, the February public-records ruling goes away. If it does not, Everett and Flock opponents will continue to argue in court about what, exactly, SB 6002 does to a case that was filed before the law existed.

The federal data-sharing question

One detail from the Flock rollout has drawn separate scrutiny. Public records reviewed by reporters showed that from April to June 2025, federal agencies — including U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Homeland Security Investigations — queried Everett’s Flock network. The access was possible because Everett, like many departments on the platform, had Flock’s “nationwide lookup” feature enabled until July 2025.

EPD spokesperson Natalie Given described the feature. “While national look up feature was enabled, outside agencies would have had the ability to query all networks with the feature enabled en masse, including Everett’s,” Given said.

Former Everett Police Chief John DeRousse confirmed that Flock’s user agreements restrict use to legitimate law enforcement purposes and prohibit civil immigration enforcement and First Amendment-protected activity. Under SB 6002, sharing ALPR data with federal agencies is now legally prohibited — a shift that formalizes what department policies had already required in many cases.

Where other Washington cities stand

Everett is not the only Washington city working through the Flock question. Each city has landed in a different place:

• Mountlake Terrace canceled its Flock contract in December 2025 before the cameras were even installed, citing community division and public-records concerns.
• Lynnwood terminated its Flock contract in February 2026, roughly seven months after installation, after resident pushback.
• Stanwood is appealing a similar public-records ruling and reactivated its network on April 1, 2026.
• Everett reactivated and is pursuing its motion to vacate, with the May 14 hearing as the next step.

Those four trajectories — cancel, terminate, reactivate-and-appeal, reactivate-and-move — capture the range of policy responses a Washington city can take in the post-SB 6002 environment.

What this means for Everett residents

For most residents, the practical changes under SB 6002 are easy to summarize. ALPR data from Everett’s cameras can now be held for no longer than 21 days before deletion. Federal agencies cannot receive Everett’s data. ALPR collection locations near schools and health care facilities are restricted. Public-records requests for raw footage will be refused under the new exemption.

What the cameras still do: read license plates as vehicles pass, flag plates against hot lists (stolen vehicles, Amber Alerts, felony warrants), and log timestamps and locations that Everett Police can query during an investigation. That operational picture has not changed. The governance around it has.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Everett’s Flock cameras back on?

Yes. The City of Everett confirmed on April 22, 2026 that the cameras have been reactivated. Most of the 68-camera network was back online by April 7, 2026, after Mayor Cassie Franklin directed the Everett Police Department to restart the network in early April.

What is SB 6002 and why does it matter?

Senate Bill 6002, also known as the Driver Privacy Act, was signed by Governor Bob Ferguson on March 30, 2026. It exempts ALPR footage from Washington’s Public Records Act, sets a 21-day retention limit, prohibits sharing data with federal agencies, and restricts ALPR collection near schools and health care facilities.

Why were Everett’s cameras shut off in February?

A Snohomish County Superior Court judge ruled in February 2026 that Everett’s ALPR footage was a public record under the state Public Records Act. The city paused the network in response to the ruling while it evaluated its legal options.

How many Flock cameras does Everett operate?

Everett operates 68 Flock ALPR cameras across the city under a two-year, $550,000 grant-funded contract that was signed in June 2024.

Can federal immigration agencies access Everett’s ALPR data?

Under SB 6002, data sharing with federal agencies is now prohibited. Records show that federal agencies queried Everett’s network between April and June 2025 using Flock’s “nationwide lookup” feature, which Everett kept enabled until July 2025. That access is no longer permitted under state law.

What happens at the May 14 court hearing?

Snohomish County Superior Court is scheduled to hear Everett’s motion to vacate the February 2026 public-records ruling in light of SB 6002. If the motion is granted, the February ruling goes away. If not, litigation continues.

How long can Everett Police keep ALPR data under the new law?

SB 6002 caps retention of ALPR data at 21 days. The ACLU of Washington has said this window is too long and that the original version of the legislation called for 72 hours.

Have any Washington cities walked away from Flock?

Yes. Mountlake Terrace canceled its contract in December 2025 before installation. Lynnwood terminated its contract in February 2026. Stanwood and Everett have both reactivated their networks under SB 6002 but are still working through prior legal challenges.

What is Everett’s August 2026 EMS levy ballot measure? On April 22, 2026, the Everett City Council voted to send a property tax levy lid lift to the August 4 primary ballot. If voters approve, the city’s emergency medical services (EMS) levy rate would rise from $0.36 per $1,000 of assessed value back to $0.50 per $1,000 — the rate voters originally approved in 2000. The typical Everett homeowner would pay about $80 more per year. The levy funds roughly 78 firefighter-paramedic positions inside the Everett Fire Department.

What the Everett City Council actually did on April 22

On Wednesday, April 22, 2026, the Everett City Council voted to place a property tax levy lid lift for emergency medical services on the August 4 primary ballot. The measure would restore the city’s EMS levy rate from its current $0.36 per $1,000 of assessed value back to the $0.50 per $1,000 cap that Everett voters first approved in 2000.

This is not a new tax. Washington state law limits how fast regular property tax collections can grow — no more than 1% per year, regardless of how fast property values rise. Over time, that 1% ceiling has pushed Everett’s effective EMS rate well below the ceiling voters originally said yes to. A levy lid lift asks voters for permission to reset the rate back up to the original cap.

How much it costs a typical Everett household

According to the city, the average Everett homeowner would pay approximately $80 more per year if the measure passes. The exact dollar impact depends on a home’s assessed value, because the rate is applied per $1,000 of assessed value. A home assessed at $500,000, for example, would pay roughly $70 more annually — $250 at the new rate versus $180 at the current rate.

Renters don’t pay property tax directly, but the cost is typically reflected in rents over time. Commercial property owners also pay the levy and may pass costs along to tenants.

What the EMS levy actually funds

The EMS levy is one of the primary funding sources for Everett’s emergency medical services — the ambulance, paramedic, and first-response medical calls handled by the Everett Fire Department. The levy currently supports about 78 positions inside the department, according to city documents presented at the April 22 meeting.

When residents call 911 for a heart attack, a car crash, a fall, or an overdose, the people who arrive are paid largely through this levy. Everett Fire Department responds to thousands of medical calls per year — the overwhelming majority of its total call volume is medical, not fire.

Why the levy is on the ballot again

Everett Fire Chief Dave DeMarco addressed the City Council on April 22 in support of the measure. According to his statement, the EMS fund has remained solvent but call volume has grown and the cost of labor and medical supplies has risen since the last lid lift.

“The fund has remained solvent throughout this period of extraordinary growth, also a global pandemic and increasing demands for service,” DeMarco told the council. “However, to remain stable and meet the growing emergency medical services needs of our community, the restoration of the levy is necessary.”

The city notes that call volume at the Everett Fire Department is higher today than it was in 2018, when voters last restored the $0.50 rate. Labor and medical supply costs have also increased in that period.

Everett’s levy history: 2000, 2010, 2018, 2026

Everett voters have approved EMS levy lid lifts multiple times over the past 25 years, each time restoring the rate to the $0.50 per $1,000 cap that was originally authorized in 2000. The pattern is consistent:

• 2000: Everett voters approved a permanent EMS levy at $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed value.
• 2010: Voters approved a lid lift restoring the rate to $0.50 after state law had allowed it to drift downward.
• 2018: Voters approved another lid lift restoring the rate to $0.50.
• 2026: The current measure, scheduled for the August 4 primary ballot.

The recurring nature of these votes is a direct consequence of Washington’s 1% property tax cap, which applies to most regular levies statewide and was established by Initiative 747 in 2001.

What “levy lid lift” means in plain English

A levy lid lift is a ballot measure that asks voters for permission to raise a regular property tax levy back up to a previously authorized cap. It does not create a new tax. It also does not authorize a rate higher than what voters previously approved.

Without a lid lift, state law caps year-over-year growth in a regular property tax levy at 1%, even when property values and service costs rise faster than that. For a service like EMS — where labor costs, medical supplies, and call volume all outpace 1% inflation in most years — that ceiling gradually erodes purchasing power. A lid lift is the reset button.

What happens next

The measure now heads to the Snohomish County Auditor for placement on the August 4, 2026 primary ballot. Ballots typically mail to registered voters roughly three weeks before election day. A simple majority (50% plus one) of voters in the City of Everett is required for the lid lift to pass.

If the measure passes, the higher rate would take effect in the 2027 property tax year. If it fails, the current $0.36 rate would remain in place, and the city would face a funding gap inside the EMS fund — a gap that would need to be closed either by reducing EMS service levels, shifting costs to Everett’s general fund (which is already projecting a $14 million gap in 2027), or returning to the ballot with a revised measure.

How this fits into Everett’s larger 2027 budget picture

The EMS levy vote does not directly close the city’s projected $14 million 2027 general fund gap, which was outlined at Mayor Cassie Franklin’s 2026 State of the City address. EMS is a separate, voter-approved fund. But the two pictures are connected: if the EMS levy fails, rising medical-response costs could eventually spill over into the general fund, compounding the gap.

This is the second major voter-facing budget decision Everett has surfaced in 2026. The first was the regional fire authority and library regionalization discussion raised as part of the 2027 budget conversation. The EMS levy is the first of these budget levers to actually reach a ballot.

Frequently Asked Questions

When will Everett voters decide on the EMS levy?

The measure is scheduled for the August 4, 2026 primary ballot. Ballots typically mail to registered voters roughly three weeks before election day. A simple majority is required for the measure to pass.

How much more will I pay if the EMS levy passes?

The city estimates an average homeowner would pay approximately $80 more per year. The exact amount depends on your home’s assessed value, because the rate is charged per $1,000 of assessed value. The rate would rise from $0.36 to $0.50 per $1,000.

Is the EMS levy a new tax?

No. The EMS levy was originally approved by Everett voters in 2000. The 2026 measure is a levy lid lift, which restores the rate back to the cap voters already authorized. It does not create a new tax and does not raise the rate above $0.50 per $1,000.

What does the EMS levy pay for?

The levy funds emergency medical services provided by the Everett Fire Department — ambulance, paramedic, and medical first-response calls. The levy currently supports approximately 78 positions inside the department.

Why is this the third time Everett has voted on the $0.50 rate?

Washington state law limits regular property tax levy growth to 1% per year, even when costs and property values rise faster. Over time, that cap pushes the effective levy rate below what voters originally approved. A lid lift is required to reset the rate back up to the authorized cap. Everett voters previously approved lid lifts in 2010 and 2018.

What happens if the EMS levy fails in August?

The current $0.36 rate would remain in place. The city would face a funding gap inside the EMS fund, which would need to be closed by reducing service levels, shifting costs to the general fund, or returning to the ballot with a revised measure.

Does this affect the stadium vote or the 2027 budget gap?

Not directly. EMS is a separate, voter-approved fund and does not close the projected $14 million 2027 general fund gap. But rising medical-response costs could eventually spill over into the general fund if the EMS levy fails.

Who can vote on the Everett EMS levy?

Registered voters who live inside the City of Everett are eligible. Voters outside Everett city limits — even elsewhere in Snohomish County — do not vote on this measure.

On April 29, 2026, the Everett City Council votes on $10.6 million of stadium funding. The headlines will focus on the teams and the project timeline. If you live in Everett, the question worth asking is narrower and more personal: what does this vote actually do to your city services, your future tax bill, and the ballot measure that eventually decides the whole thing?

Here’s the resident’s version.

The vote is about a loan, not a bond

The $10.6 million on the April 29 agenda is structured as an interfund loan — the city moving money from its general fund (the same account that pays for police, fire, parks, and libraries) into the stadium project fund. The plan is to pay the general fund back when a future stadium bond measure passes.

There is no new tax on April 29. There is no ballot measure on April 29. There is no outside borrowing on April 29. There is an internal transfer of city cash, with a repayment plan pinned to a later public vote.

What this means for your property tax bill right now

Zero change. The interfund loan is not a property tax action. Your 2026 and 2027 property tax bill, as currently structured, is unaffected by the April 29 vote itself.

What could change your future tax picture is the stadium bond measure that would eventually come to voters. A bond to fund stadium construction would be repaid over time through a dedicated property tax levy. That is a future ballot decision; April 29 is a prerequisite to it, not the same thing.

What this means for your city services

This is where it gets real. The general fund pays for the things you notice day-to-day — Everett police response times, fire coverage, park maintenance, library hours, permitting, street work. The city is simultaneously publicly discussing a $14 million structural gap in the 2027 general fund.

Loaning $10.6 million out of general fund balance in April 2026 does two things at once: it reduces the cushion available against the 2027 gap, and it creates an expectation that a bond sale will repay the loan on a specific future timeline. If the bond passes, the money comes back. If the bond fails or never gets sent to the ballot, the services-side budget absorbs the loss.

The specific number to keep in mind: $4.8 million

Council materials identify $4.8 million as the floor loss if the interfund loan is approved but the subsequent bond measure fails. That is general fund money that cannot be recovered, in a year the city is also asking residents to consider new revenue options to close the $14 million gap.

Whether that risk is acceptable depends on how confident you are that a stadium bond will pass at the ballot box. There is no published polling on the Everett stadium bond yet.

What Everett residents actually get if the project completes

A 5,000-seat outdoor event center downtown at Wall Street and Broadway. The Everett AquaSox relocated from Funko Field. Two professional soccer franchises — a men’s team and a women’s team — in the United Soccer League. Year-round concerts and events. Teams are committing $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments. The city would staff one stadium-operations employee; the teams run day-to-day operations.

Mayor Cassie Franklin has framed this as a lean operating model that uses private operating capability to monetize city-owned real estate.

The future ballot timing, as best we know it

The city has not yet scheduled the bond measure that would repay the interfund loan. Based on the project timeline, a bond measure at a 2026 or 2027 general election is a realistic window. Residents can watch for the specific ballot language and timing to be set by council resolution.

If you want to know when your vote actually counts for this project, it’s on that bond measure, not on April 29. The April 29 vote is a council-only decision.

How to participate before the April 29 vote

Public comment at Everett City Council meetings is open to residents. The council meets at 6:30 p.m. at Everett City Hall, 2930 Wetmore Avenue. You can sign up to speak, submit written comment, or watch the livestream on the city website.

If you care about this vote, the most useful use of three minutes at the microphone is on the specific question in front of the council: is the $10.6 million interfund loan an acceptable general-fund risk given the 2027 budget gap?

Related Exploring Everett coverage

• Everett’s $14 Million 2027 Budget Decision: A Complete Guide to the Four Levers
• What Everett’s $14M Budget Gap Means for Your Property Tax Bill and City Services

Frequently Asked Questions

Will my Everett property taxes go up because of the April 29 stadium vote?

Not from the April 29 vote itself. It is an interfund loan, not a tax action. Your tax picture could change if a future stadium bond measure passes — but that is a separate, later ballot decision.

Can I vote on the April 29 stadium decision?

No. The April 29 decision is a City Council vote, not a ballot measure. You can provide public comment at the council meeting.

What happens to the $10.6 million if the stadium doesn’t get built?

If the subsequent bond measure fails, the city loses at least $4.8 million of general fund money that cannot be recovered, per council materials.

Does the interfund loan affect the 2027 budget gap?

It reduces the general fund balance available as a cushion against the $14 million 2027 structural gap. It does not directly cause the gap — that is a revenue-versus-expenses structural issue — but it changes the city’s reserve position.

How do I comment on the stadium vote?

Attend the April 29 council meeting at Everett City Hall, 2930 Wetmore Avenue, 6:30 p.m., or submit written public comment through the city’s website before the meeting.

Quick answer: On April 29, 2026, the Everett City Council votes on a $10.6 million funding package for downtown stadium design completion and property acquisition, structured as an interfund loan from the city’s general fund balance. The loan is planned to be repaid when the city passes a future stadium bond measure — projected north of $40 million — to fund construction. If the council approves the loan but voters later reject the bond, the city would face the loss of at least $4.8 million in general fund dollars that cannot be recovered.

The interfund loan is the least-understood part of the Everett stadium conversation, but it is the mechanism that ties every other piece together: the $7.2 million already spent, the $120 million total projected cost, the teams’ $17 million upfront commitment, and the city’s ongoing $14 million 2027 budget gap.

Here is the plain-language breakdown.

What an interfund loan is, in one paragraph

An interfund loan moves cash between accounts the city already owns. Everett’s general fund — the main operating account that pays for police, fire, parks, and general government — is one account. The stadium project fund is another. When the council authorizes an interfund loan, it transfers cash from the general fund balance to the stadium fund with the expectation that a specific future revenue source (in this case, a bond sale) will pay the general fund back.

What the money is not: not a grant, not a new tax, not external borrowing from the public bond market. It is existing city cash being lent from one pocket to another, with a plan for repayment.

The April 29 vote, in structure

The $10.6 million would fund two activities:

Stadium design completion. The Outdoor Event Center — the formal name of the project — requires a completed design package before construction bidding can begin. The design translates the 5,000-seat concept, artificial turf field, clubhouse/event space, and walking perimeter into construction documents detailed enough to price and build.

Property acquisition. The site requires 15 parcels. Council materials indicate the city has signed purchase agreements on two parcels, has pending agreements on four more, and is in active negotiations with the owners of eight others. The main entrance to the completed facility is planned at Wall Street and Broadway.

How the loan gets repaid

Repayment is tied to a future stadium bond measure. The project’s total projected cost has risen from $82 million in June 2025 to $120 million as of January 2026. The city has telegraphed a general obligation bond in the range of $40 million or more as the primary construction funding vehicle. When that bond sells, the general fund gets paid back.

The team-side revenue commitments sit on top of that structure. The three teams expected to call the stadium home — the Everett AquaSox, plus men’s and women’s United Soccer League franchises — have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments. Under the lease structure, the city would need to staff only one employee to oversee stadium operations.

The risk no one is talking about loudly

If the council approves the $10.6 million interfund loan and the city later fails to pass the bond that repays it — either because the council doesn’t send a bond to the ballot, or voters reject it — the city loses the general fund dollars that have already been spent.

The specific number being cited in council materials as the floor loss is $4.8 million. That figure represents a meaningful portion of general fund reserves in a year when the city is also publicly discussing a $14 million 2027 budget gap.

How the stadium connects to the $14M 2027 budget gap

The city’s four-lever 2027 budget decision and the stadium interfund loan are not the same conversation, but they draw from the same fund. General fund balance that is loaned to the stadium fund is balance that cannot simultaneously sit as cushion against the 2027 structural gap.

Council members asking questions at the April 29 hearing are expected to press this point: is the city comfortable lending $10.6 million from the general fund in the same calendar year it is also telling residents the general fund structurally under-collects by $14 million?

What the city has spent to date

Approximately $7.2 million in capital funds has already been spent on the stadium project. Adding the $10.6 million request would bring cumulative pre-construction city spending to roughly $17.8 million. The cumulative tally matters because it sets the floor for any future “what did we spend and what did we get for it” conversation if the bond measure fails.

Who’s on the other side of the table

The three sports tenants — AquaSox, men’s USL, women’s USL — bring $17 million in upfront commitments and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments. Mayor Cassie Franklin has publicly framed the one-employee city staffing structure as a lean-operation advantage: the teams run day-to-day operations; the city holds the real estate and collects lease revenue.

For residents evaluating the deal, the key question is whether the combined team commitments, bond proceeds, and lease stream cover the $120 million projected total cost on a timeline the city can responsibly absorb.

How to watch the April 29 vote

The Everett City Council meets at 6:30 p.m. at Everett City Hall, 2930 Wetmore Avenue. Meetings are livestreamed on the city website. The April 29 agenda item is the $10.6 million interfund loan authorization; the broader stadium bond measure is a separate, later decision.

Related Exploring Everett coverage

• Everett’s $14 Million 2027 Budget Decision: A Complete Guide to the Four Levers on the Table
• What Everett’s $14 Million Budget Gap Means for Your Property Tax Bill, City Services, and the 2026 Ballot
• Downtown Everett Stadium: Complete Guide to the $120M Outdoor Event Center

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an interfund loan in simple terms?

It is the city moving cash between accounts it already owns. General fund balance is transferred to the stadium project fund, with the expectation that a future revenue source — typically a bond sale — repays it.

Is an interfund loan the same as borrowing money from the public?

No. It is internal to the city. No external bond buyers are involved in the interfund transfer itself. A later public bond sale is what repays the interfund loan.

What happens if the council approves the loan but voters reject the stadium bond?

The city would lose at least $4.8 million in general fund dollars that cannot be recovered. That is the floor loss cited in council materials.

How much has Everett already spent on the stadium?

Approximately $7.2 million in capital funds as of the April 29, 2026 vote. Approving the $10.6 million loan would bring cumulative pre-construction spending to roughly $17.8 million.

What is the total projected cost of the Everett stadium?

$120 million as of January 2026, up from $82 million in June 2025.

Who are the stadium tenants?

The Everett AquaSox, a men’s United Soccer League franchise, and a women’s USL franchise have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments.

Where is the stadium being built?

Downtown Everett. The main entrance is planned at Wall Street and Broadway, requiring acquisition of 15 parcels.

When does Everett vote on the interfund loan?

April 29, 2026, at the regular Everett City Council meeting, 6:30 p.m. at Everett City Hall, 2930 Wetmore Avenue.

The line that has received the least attention in coverage of Everett’s April 29 stadium funding vote is also the line that matters most for anyone trying to understand how the city’s general fund works: the money would come as an interfund loan from the general fund balance, not from new outside financing. For residents trying to square the stadium conversation with the $14 million 2027 budget gap the city has been publicly discussing, this is the detail that connects them.

Here is a plain-language walk-through of what an interfund loan is, what the Outdoor Event Center is asking for on April 29, and why the mechanism matters for the next 18 months of Everett’s budget conversation.

Quick answer: On April 29, 2026, the Everett City Council will vote on a $10.6 million funding request for downtown stadium design and property acquisition. The money would be transferred as an interfund loan from the city’s general fund balance and repaid from a future stadium bond measure. The city has already spent about $7.2 million on the project, and total projected stadium cost has risen from $82 million in June 2025 to $120 million as of January 2026. Three teams — the Everett AquaSox plus men’s and women’s USL clubs — have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments.

What an Interfund Loan Is

Most residents have a mental model of how cities pay for things: taxes come in, they get spent, bonds get issued for capital projects, grants cover specific line items. An interfund loan is a fifth mechanism that does not show up as often in public conversation.

An interfund loan moves money between accounts the city already owns. In Everett’s case, the city has a general fund — the main checking account that pays for police, fire, parks, and general government — and several special-purpose funds dedicated to projects like capital construction, utilities, and stormwater. When the council authorizes an interfund loan, it moves cash from one of those funds (here, the general fund balance) to another (here, the stadium project fund) with the expectation that it will be paid back from a specific future source.

What the money is not: it is not a new grant, a new tax, or money the city is borrowing from the public bond market right now. It is existing city cash being lent from one pocket to another.

What makes the mechanism appropriate in this case, according to the administration’s framing, is that the stadium project will eventually issue a general obligation bond of more than $40 million to fund construction. The interfund loan bridges the gap between today’s design work and the point at which the bond gets issued. When the bond sells, the general fund gets paid back.

What the $10.6M Actually Funds

The April 29 request covers two activities:

Stadium design completion. The stadium — formally the Outdoor Event Center — still requires a completed design package before it can move to construction bidding. The design package translates the 5,000-seat concept, the artificial turf field, the clubhouse that doubles as event space, and the walking perimeter into construction documents detailed enough to price and build.

Property acquisition. The site requires 15 parcels. Consultant reports shared with the council indicate the city has signed purchase agreements on two parcels, has pending agreements on four more, and is in active negotiations with the owners of eight others. None of the purchases close unless the full stadium project moves forward, but the April 29 funding keeps the negotiation and signed-agreement work moving.

The main entrance to the completed facility is planned at Wall Street and Broadway.

What the City Has Spent So Far

The city has already spent about $7.2 million in capital funds on the stadium project. Adding the $10.6 million request would bring cumulative city spending to approximately $17.8 million before any construction begins.

Sports-team commitments partially offset that figure. The three teams that plan to call the stadium home — the Everett AquaSox, plus the men’s and women’s United Soccer League franchises — have committed $17 million upfront, with roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments promised afterward. Teams would handle day-to-day operations. Under the lease terms, the city would need to staff only one employee to oversee stadium operations, a point Mayor Cassie Franklin has highlighted as a lean-operation advantage.

The city also has other funding sources stacked up:

• $7.4 million from the state youth athletic fields fund
• $5 million from Snohomish County phased across 2027 through 2030
• A planned bond of more than $40 million

Those sources together leave what consultant Ben Franz described during a recent briefing as approximately a $25 million funding gap relative to the current $120 million projection. Franz framed the city’s strategy this way: “The more upfront capital we’re able to secure, the less debt the city has to issue.”

Why the Cost Has Moved from $82M to $120M

When the city first brought a $4.8 million stadium funding measure to council in June 2025, the total project was estimated at $82 million. By January 2026, that figure had climbed to $120 million — a 46% increase over roughly seven months.

Construction escalation in the Puget Sound region is the usual driver for a jump like that. Labor, steel, and concrete costs have all moved. Design refinements also play a role: as architects translate concept to documents, elements like seating configurations, accessibility requirements, and infrastructure tie-ins often expand the scope. A third factor specific to Everett is that the stadium is on a constrained urban site, not a suburban greenfield, which drives costs for things like utility relocation and site preparation.

The opening date has slipped from April 2027 to late 2027, with construction now planned to start in September.

Why the General Fund Connection Matters

Here is where the interfund loan intersects with the rest of Everett’s civic conversation.

The city is projecting a $14 million general fund deficit in 2027 and has been publicly evaluating four levers to close it: a regional fire authority, regional library services, another levy lid lift, or annexation of Mariner. Three of those require a public vote.

An interfund loan from the general fund balance is different from a cut to the general fund. The loan gets repaid when the bond issues. But the balance is temporarily lower while the loan is outstanding, and general fund reserves are also what the city relies on to absorb mid-year surprises. A loan of $10.6 million is meaningful relative to a fund balance that, in most recent audited statements, operates in the low tens of millions.

This is why the April 29 vote is not just a stadium vote — it is also a budget vote. Council members considering it are implicitly deciding how much short-term general fund flexibility they are willing to trade for keeping the stadium design schedule on track for a late-2027 opening.

What Happens If the Vote Fails

If the council declines the $10.6 million request, the design work cannot be completed on schedule, and property acquisition negotiations stall. The project does not die outright — the city would have to return to council with an alternative financing approach — but the late-2027 opening window would be at risk, and the teams that have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in long-term lease revenue would need to evaluate their position.

If it passes, the city continues design work, keeps property acquisition conversations live, and heads toward the stadium bond issuance that repays the interfund loan.

How to Watch the April 29 Vote

The Everett City Council meets Wednesdays at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Everett City Hall, 3002 Wetmore Ave. The April 29 agenda will be posted to the Agenda Center at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter/City-Council-10. Meetings are livestreamed and archived; residents can also attend in person or submit public comment.

For residents tracking the stadium conversation alongside the broader budget picture, the interfund loan is the place where the two stories meet.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Everett City Council voting on April 29, 2026?

A $10.6 million funding request to complete design of the downtown Outdoor Event Center (the AquaSox/USL stadium) and continue property acquisition on the 15-parcel site. The money would come as an interfund loan from the general fund balance, repaid from a future stadium bond.

What is an interfund loan?

A transfer of cash from one city fund to another, with a planned repayment from a specific future source. It is not a tax, grant, or public bond — it is existing city money moving between accounts.

How much has Everett already spent on the stadium?

About $7.2 million in capital funds so far. If the $10.6 million request passes, cumulative city spending reaches approximately $17.8 million before any construction starts.

What is the total projected stadium cost?

$120 million as of January 2026, up from $82 million in June 2025. Teams have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments. Other funding sources include $7.4 million from the state youth athletic fields fund, $5 million from Snohomish County, and a planned bond of more than $40 million.

How does the interfund loan affect the general fund?

The loan temporarily reduces the general fund balance by $10.6 million until the stadium bond is issued and the money is repaid. That is relevant because the city is also projecting a $14 million 2027 general fund deficit and evaluating options including a regional fire authority, library regionalization, a levy lid lift, or annexation.

When does the stadium open?

The target has moved from April 2027 to late 2027. Construction is planned to begin in September 2026. The facility is projected to draw 400,000 regional visitors annually.

Who uses the stadium?

The Everett AquaSox baseball team, a men’s United Soccer League team, and a women’s United Soccer League team. The teams will handle day-to-day operations, and the lease includes 50 guaranteed public-access days each year.

How can residents weigh in?

Attend the April 29 City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers (3002 Wetmore Ave.), submit written comment through the City Clerk, or watch the livestream archived through the city’s Agenda Center.

When Mayor Cassie Franklin took the stage at Angel of the Winds Arena on March 5, 2026, for her ninth annual State of the City address, she framed the year ahead around a single idea: “One Everett.” Seattle Seahawks tackle and Archbishop Murphy alumnus Abe Lucas opened the speech. What followed was a mix of economic confidence, candid acknowledgment of the budget pressure the city is navigating, and a concrete list of initiatives residents can expect to see on the ground in 2026.

Seven weeks later, several of those initiatives are already moving through City Hall — some toward the council for a vote, others into the permitting pipeline or grant applications. Here is a plain-language breakdown of the five priorities Mayor Franklin laid out, what has happened since, and what each one means for Everett residents.

Quick answer: Mayor Franklin’s 2026 State of the City address laid out five priorities: long-term sustainable revenue to protect core services, public safety investments in policing and fire response, housing actions including pre-approved backyard cottage plans, a park-upgrade wave at Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill, and district-by-district community engagement. The Outdoor Event Center and FIFA World Cup watch parties at Boxcar Park were framed as anchor economic drivers for the year.

Priority 1: Long-Term Sustainable Revenue

The revenue priority is the one doing the most work behind the scenes. Franklin told the audience the city needs to “pursue continued economic growth and new pathways to long-term, sustainable revenue to protect core services.” That sentence sounds like standard political language, but it maps directly to the $14 million projected 2027 budget deficit the Finance Department has been discussing publicly since earlier this spring.

What it means in practice: the city is actively evaluating four levers — forming a regional fire authority, regionalizing library services through a partnership with Sno-Isle, running another levy lid lift past voters, and continuing the annexation evaluation for Mariner. Three of the four require a public vote. The Mayor’s Office has not endorsed a specific path yet; the April 8 council vote that approved $200,000 for a Mariner annexation study and $50,000 for a Casino Road subarea plan was the first real money the city has put behind any of these options.

For residents, this priority matters because it is the frame every other budget decision will sit inside for the next 18 months. Core services — police, fire, parks, libraries — are what the revenue conversation is designed to protect. How Everett decides to pay for them is the open question.

Priority 2: Strategic, Community-Focused Public Safety

Public safety had three sub-priorities in the address: strategic, community-focused policing, fire response capacity investments, and alternative crisis response programs. Each one is tied to staff the city has already hired or programs already running.

On policing, Chief Robert Goetz — sworn in on January 7, 2026 — has been public about his goal of closing the EPD vacancy gap. Goetz told reporters in January the department was “down to 14, maybe 13 vacancies at this point” and said he hopes to push that number into single digits in 2026. The department promoted eight officers to sergeant, lieutenant, captain, and deputy chief in the two weeks before he was sworn in. Goetz’s stated approach — “I want our officers to get out of the car and visit with our community members because they’re the ones who are providing us with the feedback that we need to be the best police department that we can be” — is what the Mayor’s “strategic, community-focused” language points to.

On fire response, the city is simultaneously evaluating whether to join a regional fire authority, which would restructure how fire service is funded and delivered. That decision is part of the revenue conversation above.

On alternative crisis response, the Mayor’s Office has pointed to existing programs pairing behavioral health responders with police, though the address did not announce a new program. The expansion language was more about protecting what already exists through the budget cycle.

Public safety also intersects with Mayoral Directive 2026-01, signed by Franklin on February 25, 2026. The directive restricts federal immigration agents from accessing non-public areas of city buildings without a judicial warrant, requires Everett police to record interactions at the scene of any immigration enforcement activity they are called to, and reaffirms compliance with the Keep Washington Working Act. The directive was not new policy announced at the State of the City; it is already in effect. But it establishes the guardrails the city will operate inside during 2026.

Priority 3: Housing — Backyard Cottages and a New Boys and Girls Club

The most concrete housing announcement was pre-approved backyard cottage plans designed to streamline the permitting process for accessory dwelling units. Pre-approved plans mean that homeowners who use one of the city’s templates can move through permitting faster than if they brought in custom drawings — reducing design costs and review time. The goal is to make ADUs a realistic option for more Everett households.

Franklin also announced a new Boys and Girls Club at Walter E. Hall Park in Council District 4. That project is a partnership rather than a city-led build, but the site selection and the framing matter: Walter E. Hall Park sits south of the airport in an area the city has identified for family-focused investment.

Neither the backyard cottage plans nor the Boys and Girls Club is solving housing affordability on their own. They are part of what the administration describes as a supply-side strategy — add more units, reduce friction in the permit process, add more third-place community infrastructure — while the broader Puget Sound housing market works itself out.

Priority 4: Park Upgrades at Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill

Three parks are getting meaningful work in 2026.

Edgewater Park sits next to the Edgewater Bridge, which reopens April 28 after an 18-month closure and $34.9 million replacement. The park work is the natural companion to the bridge: new access, improved landings, and waterfront enhancements that make the reopened crossing feel connected to something on the west side.

Garfield Park in the Riverside neighborhood is getting a major makeover that has been in public-engagement phase with neighbors for months. Exact scope depends on the final design package, but residents have already weighed in on the direction.

Eclipse Mill Park on the riverfront is the long-timeline project. City staff confirmed earlier this spring that Eclipse Mill is now targeting a spring 2028 opening — later than initial hopes but reflecting both design complexity and funding sequencing. Eclipse Mill is designed to be Everett’s signature riverfront park when it eventually opens.

Parks are also a quiet revenue story: well-maintained, high-quality parks are one of the more reliable drivers of residential property values, which in turn affect the city’s assessed value and long-term property tax base.

Priority 5: District-by-District Community Engagement

The final priority was the least flashy but the most interesting from a civic-engagement standpoint. Franklin announced that community meetings would be scheduled in each City Council district, following the success of the District 2 town hall. For residents, that means the Mayor’s Office is committing to show up in neighborhoods rather than only hosting conversations at City Hall.

The significance is partly operational — getting seven districts worth of face-to-face feedback in one year is a real lift — and partly political. Three of the four budget levers on the table for 2027 require a public vote. An administration that has already sat down with voters in their neighborhoods has a better shot at explaining those ballot questions when they come up.

The Economic Anchors: Outdoor Event Center and FIFA 2026

Woven through the speech were two economic anchors. The Outdoor Event Center — the downtown stadium project that hosts Everett AquaSox baseball, United Soccer League men’s and women’s teams, and community events — is projected to draw 400,000 regional visitors annually once it opens in late 2027. Property acquisition is in negotiation, and a $10.6 million design funding request goes to council on April 29.

The FIFA World Cup watch parties at Boxcar Park on June 11, 12, 18, and 19 are the shorter-term bet: a free, public fan zone in the waterfront district designed to bring people into Everett during the biggest sporting event of the summer.

How to Track Progress on These Priorities

Every initiative Franklin announced has a paper trail. City Council agendas and minutes are posted at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter/City-Council-10, and the council meets on Wednesdays at 6:30 p.m. except fourth and fifth Wednesdays, which meet at 12:30 p.m. Mayoral directives are archived at everettwa.gov/1789/Mayoral-Directives. Budget documents and the 2027 budget discussion will run through the Finance Department in the fall.

The shortest answer to “what is Everett working on in 2026?” is: revenue, public safety, housing, parks, and community engagement — with the stadium and World Cup as economic accelerators. The Mayor’s framing — “Everett’s progress is best measured by how people experience our city every day” — is the test the administration has set for itself.

Frequently Asked Questions

When was Mayor Franklin’s 2026 State of the City address?

Mayor Cassie Franklin delivered her ninth annual State of the City address on March 5, 2026. Seattle Seahawks tackle and Archbishop Murphy alumnus Abe Lucas opened the speech.

What are Mayor Franklin’s five priorities for 2026?

The address outlined five priorities: pursuing long-term sustainable revenue to protect core services, strategic and community-focused public safety, housing actions including pre-approved backyard cottage plans, park upgrades at Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill, and district-by-district community engagement through town halls.

What is Everett doing about the $14 million 2027 budget gap?

Four levers are being evaluated: forming a regional fire authority, regionalizing library services with Sno-Isle Libraries, running another levy lid lift past voters, and continuing the annexation evaluation for Mariner. Three of the four require a public vote. The administration has not endorsed a single path.

How many police vacancies does EPD have?

Chief Robert Goetz said in January 2026 that the department was down to 13 or 14 vacancies and he hopes to push the number into single digits during 2026. Eight officers were promoted to supervisory roles in the two weeks before Goetz was sworn in on January 7, 2026.

What is Mayoral Directive 2026-01?

Signed by Mayor Franklin on February 25, 2026, the directive restricts federal immigration agents from accessing non-public areas of city buildings without a judicial warrant, requires Everett police to record interactions at the scene of immigration enforcement activity, and reaffirms compliance with Washington’s Keep Washington Working Act.

When do the Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill park projects open?

The Edgewater Bridge adjacent to Edgewater Park reopens April 28, 2026. Garfield Park is in the design/public-engagement phase. Eclipse Mill Park is targeting a spring 2028 opening.

What are the FIFA World Cup watch parties at Boxcar Park?

Free, public fan zones hosted at Boxcar Park on the Everett waterfront on June 11, 12, 18, and 19, 2026, during the FIFA World Cup group stage and knockout matches.

How can I attend a City Council district town hall?

The Mayor’s Office will schedule community meetings in each City Council district throughout 2026. Details are posted to everettwa.gov and announced through the City’s news flash page at everettwa.gov/m/newsflash.

Q: As an Everett resident, what should I expect from the 2027 budget process?

A: Expect at least one budget-related ballot measure in November 2026, possibly more than one. The most likely options include a Regional Fire Authority question, a Sno-Isle Libraries annexation question, and a property tax levy lid lift. Each affects your bill differently. Regional fire and library measures typically don’t raise your total tax bill day one — they move which government entity collects which portion. A levy lid lift directly raises the bill. Beyond ballots, expect a fall 2026 city budget process focused on whether to cut services, draw down reserves, or both, while the structural levers work through their longer timelines.

What Everett’s $14 Million Budget Gap Means for Your Property Tax Bill, City Services, and 2026 Ballot

If you live inside Everett city limits, the city’s $14 million 2027 budget gap is going to land on your kitchen table in three specific ways: the property tax bill that arrives in your mailbox, the services you rely on (police response times, library hours, parks staffing, road maintenance), and the ballot you receive in October 2026. This guide walks through each.

What’s Likely on Your November 2026 Ballot

The Everett City Council has not yet placed any 2026 budget-related measures on the ballot, but Mayor Cassie Franklin has named four structural levers under active consideration. Three of them require voter approval. The early-August 2026 deadline to finalize ballot language gives the city a defined window to decide which questions Everett residents see on November 3.

The most likely candidates, based on Franklin’s March 6 keynote and the April 8 Council action:

• A Regional Fire Authority question. “Yes” would create or join a multi-jurisdictional fire and EMS district funded by its own voter-approved property tax and benefit charges. Your city tax portion drops; a new RFA portion is added. Net change to your bill on day one is usually small.
• A Sno-Isle Libraries annexation question. “Yes” would dissolve the Everett Public Library as a city department and merge Everett into the Sno-Isle district. Your city portion drops; a new Sno-Isle library portion is added. Library service continues.
• A property tax levy lid lift. This would raise the city’s portion of your property tax above the 1 percent annual cap. The 2024 version, which voters rejected, would have added about $336 per year for the average homeowner.

It is possible the Council places only one of these on November 2026. It is also possible it places two or three. The annexation study for the Mariner neighborhood is on a longer timeline and is not expected to produce a ballot question for current city residents in 2026.

What Each Ballot Outcome Means for Your Bill

RFA — yes: Your total property tax bill probably stays close to flat in year one. Long-term, the RFA has more flexibility to raise its own rates than the city does under the 1 percent cap.

RFA — no: Fire stays in the city general fund. The city has to find $14 million somewhere else for 2027, which means deeper service cuts, a different ballot strategy, or both.

Sno-Isle library annexation — yes: Same pattern as the RFA. Bill stays roughly flat. Library service continues, run by Sno-Isle.

Sno-Isle library annexation — no: Library funding stays in the general fund. Library hours and programs are exposed to deeper cuts in 2027.

Levy lid lift — yes: Your city tax portion goes up. The 2024 version was about $336 per year for the average Everett homeowner; a 2026 version may be smaller or paired with specific spending commitments.

Levy lid lift — no: Same outcome as no RFA — the gap has to be closed elsewhere, primarily through service cuts.

What Service Cuts Could Look Like

The 2024 budget gap of $12.6 million produced 31 layoffs. The 2027 gap is bigger and the easy one-time tools the city used to soften 2026 — paused pension contributions, COVID-relief reserves — have largely been spent. If structural revenue moves don’t land in time, the 2027 budget would have to lean harder on operational reductions.

Everett has not published a 2027 service cut menu, and the mayor’s preliminary budget is not expected until fall. Based on the 2024 reductions and the categories that show up first when cities face general-fund pressure, the areas most at risk include parks programming and maintenance, library hours, non-essential city positions, and the discretionary side of public safety budgets.

Things state law largely protects from the same cuts: pensions, debt service, public safety baseline operations, and statutory programs. Things voters have specifically funded through dedicated levies (parks bonds, transportation, etc.) sit outside the general fund and are not at the same risk.

Why the 2024 Lift Failed and What Could Change in 2026

The April 2024 levy lid lift didn’t just lose. It lost decisively. Reading the result, the most-cited reasons in public reporting were the size of the increase (about $336/year for the average homeowner), the broad-purpose framing (general fund support rather than a specific program), and the cost-of-living context for a city that had absorbed back-to-back inflation years.

If the city brings a measure back in November 2026, the most likely changes are some combination of a smaller ask, a shorter duration (rather than permanent), and tighter purpose framing — a “public safety” or “parks and libraries” levy with named funding commitments rather than a general-purpose lift. Other Washington cities have passed targeted measures after stand-alone general ones failed. That is the playbook to watch for.

What You Can Do Between Now and November

The Everett City Council holds public comment opportunities at every regular meeting (typically Wednesday evenings). The 2027 preliminary budget will be the focal civic conversation from September through November. Ballot questions get refined through summer and finalized in early August. The City of Everett’s budget portal at everettwa.gov publishes the projections, the budget book, and the meeting agendas.

If you want a single window of high-leverage civic engagement on the 2027 budget, it is roughly June through early August 2026 — the period when the Council is deciding what to put on the ballot, what cuts to propose, and what the public is willing to support. After early August, the ballot is locked. After November, the result determines the structural shape of Everett’s budget for the next decade.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will my Everett property tax bill go up in 2027?

It depends on what the City Council decides to put on the November 2026 ballot and how voters respond. A levy lid lift would directly raise your bill. RFA or Sno-Isle library measures typically don’t raise the total day one — they shift which entity collects which portion.

Will my city services be cut?

If structural revenue moves don’t land in time, yes. The 2024 budget gap led to 31 layoffs; the 2027 gap is larger and the one-time tools have been used. The mayor’s preliminary 2027 budget is expected in the fall.

Why does Everett have a $14 million deficit?

Washington state law (Initiative 747, 2001) caps annual city property tax growth at 1 percent. City costs grow faster than that. The gap compounds over time and is now $14 million for the 2027 budget.

What is a Regional Fire Authority and would I notice the change?

An RFA is a separate Washington government entity that runs fire and EMS for multiple cities. You would still get fire service from what looks like the same department. The change is on funding and governance — a separate line on your tax bill instead of a slice of the city’s general fund.

If Everett joins Sno-Isle Libraries, what happens to the Everett Public Library?

The library buildings, staff, and programs would continue. Operations would be run by the Sno-Isle district, which already serves most of Snohomish County. Funding shifts from the city’s general fund to a separate Sno-Isle property tax line.

Can I attend the City Council meetings on the budget?

Yes. Council meetings are held Wednesday evenings at City Hall and are open to the public, with public comment periods. Meeting agendas are posted at everettwa.gov.

Does the Mariner annexation affect my taxes if I already live in Everett?

Not directly. Annexation would change tax rates for newly annexed Mariner residents, not for existing city residents. Annexation does affect the city’s overall fiscal picture, which can affect future service levels and budget choices.

Q: What is Everett, Washington’s plan to close its $14 million 2027 budget deficit?

A: Everett finance staff project a $14 million general fund shortfall for 2027 — larger than the $12.6 million 2024 gap that forced 31 layoffs. Mayor Cassie Franklin has named four levers under active consideration: regionalizing fire services through a Regional Fire Authority, regionalizing libraries by joining Sno-Isle Libraries, a property tax levy lid lift, and annexing parts of the urban growth area starting with the Mariner neighborhood (about 21,000 residents). Three of the four require voter approval. Decisions will sequence through fall 2026 budget hearings and the November 2026 ballot.

Everett’s $14 Million 2027 Budget Decision: A Complete Guide to the Four Levers on the Table

Everett, Washington is staring down a $14 million general fund deficit for the 2027 budget — and for the first time in more than a decade, every major lever the city has to close it is publicly on the table at once. Regional fire authority. Regional libraries through Sno-Isle. A new property tax levy lid lift. Annexation of unincorporated south Everett, starting with the 21,000-person Mariner neighborhood. Three of those four require a vote of the people. The fourth almost certainly does too.

This is the structural moment Mayor Cassie Franklin warned about during her March 6, 2026 keynote address. “We cannot cut our way to a sustainable future,” Franklin said, citing the need for “economic growth and new pathways to long-term, sustainable revenue.” This guide explains how Everett got here, what each of the four levers would actually do, what residents would see on their tax bills, and what to watch between now and the November 2026 election.

How Everett Built a Structural Deficit

The root cause is a state law most Everett residents have never heard of. Under Initiative 747, approved by Washington voters in 2001, cities can raise their regular property tax levy by only 1 percent per year without going back to the ballot. The cost of running a city — police, fire, parks, libraries, streets, public works — rises faster than that. In most years, public-sector costs grow with wages and inflation, in the 3 to 5 percent range. The gap compounds.

Everett’s 2026 budget, approved unanimously by the City Council on November 19, 2025 at $613 million, papered over the gap by pausing some pension contributions and using one-time funds to avoid layoffs. The 2024 budget was harder: a $12.6 million deficit forced 31 layoffs. Now the 2027 projection has reached $14 million, and the one-time tools have already been used.

Lever One: A Regional Fire Authority

“Regional fire” is shorthand for a Regional Fire Authority, or RFA — a separate Washington government entity authorized under Chapter 52.26 RCW that provides fire and emergency medical services across multiple jurisdictions and is funded by its own voter-approved property tax and benefit charges. Cities across Washington have moved to RFAs over the past decade because the structure shifts fire costs off general-fund budgets that are squeezed by the 1 percent cap.

For Everett, an RFA would likely mean joining or forming a multi-jurisdictional authority covering parts of south Snohomish County. Residents would still get fire service from what would functionally look like the same department. They would see a separate line on their property tax bill for the RFA. The city’s general fund would no longer carry the fire department’s cost.

An RFA does not usually raise total household taxes on day one because the new RFA levy is offset by a reduction in the city’s portion. Over time, however, RFAs have flexibility to raise their own levies that cities under the 1 percent cap don’t have. Creating or joining an RFA requires voter approval in each participating jurisdiction.

Lever Two: Joining Sno-Isle Libraries

Everett currently runs the Everett Public Library as a city department, with branches downtown and in Evergreen. Most of the surrounding area — including the Mariner neighborhood Everett is studying for annexation — is served by Sno-Isle Libraries, a regional library district covering most of Snohomish and Island counties and funded by its own voter-approved property tax.

Regionalizing would mean dissolving the city’s library operation and annexing Everett into the Sno-Isle district. Residents would still have libraries. The city would no longer budget for them. The cost would shift to a separate Sno-Isle levy, which is also subject to the 1 percent cap but sits on a cleaner structural footing because it isn’t competing with police, fire, streets, and parks for the same pool of money.

Like the RFA path, a Sno-Isle annexation would require voter approval and would typically produce a roughly neutral total tax change on day one — the city’s portion drops as the Sno-Isle portion is added.

Lever Three: Another Levy Lid Lift

Under state law, cities can ask voters to temporarily or permanently raise the property tax levy above the 1 percent cap. Everett tried this in April 2024, asking voters to raise the city’s regular property tax levy from $1.52 per $1,000 of assessed value to $2.19 per $1,000 — about $336 per year more for the average homeowner. Voters rejected it decisively.

Any 2026 or 2027 attempt has to contend with that result. Smaller ask. Shorter duration. A package that pairs a lift with specific spending commitments residents can see — a public safety levy, for example, instead of a general-purpose ask. Other Washington cities have passed targeted levies after stand-alone general lifts failed.

Lever Four: Annexation, Starting With Mariner

On April 8, 2026, the Everett City Council approved a $250,000 budget amendment — $200,000 to fund a consulting study of potential annexation, with the Mariner neighborhood as Mayor Franklin’s stated top priority, and $50,000 for a Casino Road subarea plan. City spokesperson Simone Tarver called the vote “just a first step in the process.”

Mariner sits mostly west of Interstate 5, south of the current city limits. About 21,000 people live there today. It includes Mariner High School, a Sno-Isle Libraries branch, several busy bus routes, and a planned Sound Transit light rail station on the Everett Link Extension. Everett’s full urban growth area — the land the state already considers part of the city’s future footprint — contains roughly 47,690 people. Annexing all of it would push Everett’s population from about 111,000 to about 159,000, a 43 percent increase.

Annexation grows the property tax base, brings in state-issued sales tax credits available to cities annexing more than 10,000 residents at once, and expands the denominator the city can spread fixed costs across. It is not free revenue — annexed residents need services that cost money to provide. The $200,000 study is designed to model whether the math works in 2026 in a way it did not work when Everett walked away from a much larger annexation in 2008.

What Residents Would and Would Not See on a Tax Bill

Three of the four levers — RFA, Sno-Isle library annexation, levy lift — would require voter approval. The fourth, annexation of Mariner or other UGA areas, would very likely require a vote too, depending on the legal method chosen. The dollar impact differs by lever:

• RFA — usually neutral on the total bill day one; the city portion drops as the RFA portion is added. Long-term, RFAs have more flexibility to raise rates.
• Sno-Isle library annexation — same structural pattern as the RFA. Neutral day one; new revenue stream over time.
• Levy lid lift — directly raises the total bill. The 2024 attempt would have added about $336 per year for the average homeowner.
• Annexation — raises bills for newly annexed residents (who switch from county to city tax rates) but not for existing city residents.

The Decision Calendar

Mayor Franklin is expected to deliver her 2027 preliminary budget proposal to the City Council in the early fall, on Everett’s standard budget calendar. Between now and then, the city will refine cost projections, receive interim findings from the Mariner annexation study, and engage with the local fire district and Sno-Isle Libraries on regionalization conversations. Any ballot measure intended for the November 3, 2026 general election would need to be finalized by early August 2026.

The decisions to watch, in order: the annexation study findings (expected late 2026 or early 2027), the fall 2026 preliminary budget, whether the city places a regional fire or library question on the November ballot, and whether a new levy lid lift returns to voters in 2026 or 2027. Each decision narrows the set of options that remain.

What Is Already Being Done

The 2026 budget uses one-time funds and pension pauses to hold staffing flat through this year. That buys time but not a solution. The Council has approved both the annexation study and the Casino Road subarea plan, both on April 8. Beyond that, the city has pointed to broader economic momentum — continued housing construction, new business licenses, the Boeing 737 North Line opening at Paine Field, and the Millwright District and Waterfront Place developments — as long-term revenue drivers. None of those arrive in time to close the 2027 gap on their own.

Everett’s structural revenue challenge is not unique among Washington cities, but the simultaneity of the four levers Franklin has named is unusual. Most cities pick one tool and run it. Everett may end up running several at once. That is what a $14 million gap with the easy moves already used looks like in practice.

Frequently Asked Questions

How big is Everett’s projected 2027 budget deficit?

Everett finance staff project a $14 million general fund shortfall for the 2027 budget. That is larger than the $12.6 million deficit in 2024, which forced 31 layoffs.

What are the four levers Mayor Franklin has named?

Regionalizing fire services through a Regional Fire Authority, regionalizing libraries by joining the Sno-Isle Libraries district, asking voters for a property tax levy lid lift, and annexing parts of the urban growth area starting with the Mariner neighborhood.

How many of those levers require voter approval?

Three of the four — the RFA, the Sno-Isle library annexation, and the levy lid lift — require voter approval. Annexation also typically requires a vote, depending on the legal method chosen.

Will regionalizing fire or libraries raise my property taxes?

Not usually on day one. The new RFA or Sno-Isle levy is typically offset by a reduction in the city’s portion of the property tax. Over time, both districts have more flexibility to raise rates than cities under the 1 percent cap have.

Why did the 2024 Everett levy lid lift fail at the ballot?

Voters rejected it. The proposal would have raised Everett’s regular property tax levy from $1.52 per $1,000 of assessed value to $2.19 per $1,000 — about $336 per year more for the average homeowner.

How does the 1 percent property tax cap work?

Under Initiative 747, approved by Washington voters in 2001, most cities can only raise their regular property tax levy by 1 percent per year without going to voters. Public-sector costs typically grow at 3 to 5 percent annually, which is the structural source of Everett’s gap.

When will Everett decide which levers to use?

Mayor Franklin is expected to present a preliminary 2027 budget to the City Council in the fall of 2026. Any ballot measures for the November 3, 2026 general election must be finalized by early August. The Mariner annexation study is expected to conclude in late 2026 or early 2027.

Could Everett use more than one lever at once?

Yes. The four levers address different parts of the structural problem — regionalization shifts costs off the general fund, annexation grows the base, a levy lift raises the rate. Policymakers often combine these tools rather than picking one. Everett may run two or three in parallel through the November 2026 election.

Q: How big is Everett’s 2027 budget shortfall and what could the city do about it?

A: Everett finance staff project a $14 million general fund deficit for the 2027 budget — larger than the $12.6 million gap that forced 31 layoffs in 2024. Mayor Cassie Franklin has named four levers under active discussion: regionalizing fire services, regionalizing library services, another property tax levy lid lift, and annexation of unincorporated areas like Mariner. Three of the four would require voter approval, which in Everett has a mixed record — voters rejected the last levy lid lift in 2024.

Everett’s $14 Million Budget Gap Is Back — and Regionalizing Fire and Libraries Is on the Table

Everett’s budget math gets harder in 2027. Finance staff are projecting a $14 million general fund shortfall — a wider gap than the $12.6 million deficit in 2024 that led to 31 layoffs and a ballot measure voters turned down. Mayor Cassie Franklin has named the levers the city is weighing to close it: regionalizing fire services, regionalizing library services, going back to the ballot for a property tax levy lid lift, and annexation. Three of those four require voter approval.

“We cannot cut our way to a sustainable future,” Franklin said during her March 6 keynote address, pointing to the need for “economic growth and new pathways to long-term, sustainable revenue.” What follows is what each of those paths would actually mean for residents — and how Everett got here.

How Everett Ended Up With a Structural Deficit

The basic cause is a gap between how fast Everett’s costs rise and how fast Washington state allows the city to raise property tax revenue. Under Initiative 747, approved by voters in 2001, cities can increase their regular property tax levy by only 1 percent per year without going back to the ballot. The cost of delivering police, fire, parks, libraries and streets rises faster than that — in most years, closer to the rate of inflation or the rate of wage growth for public employees.

The compounding effect is slow but relentless. Each year the revenue line grows by about 1 percent plus new construction, while the expense line grows by 3 to 5 percent. Over a decade, the lines drift apart. Everett’s 2026 budget, approved unanimously by the City Council on November 19, 2025 at $613 million, papered over that gap by pausing some pension contributions and spending one-time funds to avoid layoffs. Those are not repeatable moves.

That is how the 2027 projection reached $14 million.

Lever One: Regionalizing Fire Services

“Regional fire” is policy shorthand for a Regional Fire Authority, or RFA — a separate government entity, authorized under Washington’s Chapter 52.26 RCW, that provides fire and EMS services across multiple cities and unincorporated areas and is funded by its own voter-approved property tax and benefit charges instead of through participating cities’ general funds. Cities in the state have increasingly moved toward RFAs over the past decade because the structure moves fire costs off general-fund budgets that are squeezed by the 1 percent cap.

For Everett, an RFA would likely mean joining or forming a multi-jurisdictional fire authority serving parts of south Snohomish County. Residents would still get fire service from what would functionally look like the same department — but would see a separate line on their property tax bill for the RFA, and the city’s general fund would no longer carry the fire department’s cost.

Creating or joining an RFA requires voter approval in each participating jurisdiction. It does not usually raise total household taxes on day one, because the new RFA levy is offset by a reduction in the city levy. Over time, however, RFAs have flexibility to raise their own levies that cities don’t have.

Lever Two: Regionalizing Library Services

Everett currently operates the Everett Public Library as a city department, with branches downtown and in Evergreen. Most of the surrounding area — including the Mariner neighborhood Everett is studying for annexation — is served by Sno-Isle Libraries, a regional library district that covers most of Snohomish and Island counties and is funded by its own voter-approved property tax.

Regionalizing would mean dissolving the city’s library operation and annexing Everett into the Sno-Isle district. Residents would continue to have libraries. The city would no longer budget for them. The cost would shift to a separate Sno-Isle property tax, which is also subject to the 1 percent cap but sits on a cleaner structural footing because it isn’t competing with police, fire, streets and parks for the same pool of money.

As with fire regionalization, the move requires voter approval. And as with fire, it usually means a roughly neutral change on day one for residents’ total tax bill, because the city’s portion of the property tax would drop as the Sno-Isle portion is added.

Lever Three: Another Levy Lid Lift Attempt

Under state law, cities can ask voters to temporarily or permanently raise the property tax levy above the 1 percent cap. This is called a levy lid lift. Everett tried this in April 2024, asking voters to raise the city’s regular property tax levy rate from $1.52 per $1,000 of assessed value to $2.19 per $1,000 — a jump of roughly $336 per year for the average homeowner. Voters rejected it decisively.

Any new levy lift attempt would have to contend with that result. Options the city could consider include a smaller ask, a shorter duration, or a package that pairs a lift with specific spending commitments residents can see — similar to public safety levies other Washington cities have passed after stand-alone general-purpose lifts failed.

Lever Four: Annexation

Everett approved $200,000 on April 8 to study annexing parts of its urban growth area — with the Mariner neighborhood, home to about 21,000 residents, as the top priority. Annexation adds property tax base, brings in state-issued sales tax credits available to cities annexing more than 10,000 residents at once, and — the whole point — expands the denominator the city can spread fixed costs across.

It is not free revenue. Annexed residents get city services, which cost money to provide. Everett explored a much larger annexation in 2008 and walked away, citing those costs. The $200,000 study is designed to tell the current council whether the math works in 2026 that did not work in 2008 — a different era for city finance, regional transit, and the state’s sales tax credit program.

What Residents Would and Wouldn’t See

Three of the four levers — regional fire, regional library, levy lift — would require voter approval. The fourth — annexation — would very likely require a vote too, depending on the method. In all four, the dollar impact on a typical household is not straightforward. Regionalizing fire or libraries rearranges which line item on a property tax bill funds them without usually raising the total immediately. A levy lift directly raises the total. Annexation would raise the total for newly annexed residents, not for people already inside city limits.

What residents are likely to see first is a budget process. Mayor Franklin is expected to deliver her 2027 preliminary budget proposal to the City Council in the early fall, following the typical Everett budget calendar. Between now and then, the city will refine cost projections, receive the annexation study, and engage with the fire district and Sno-Isle Libraries on regionalization conversations. Any ballot measure the city wants on the November 2026 general election would need to be finalized by early August.

What’s Already Being Done

The 2026 budget uses one-time funds and pension pauses to hold staffing flat through this year. That buys time but not a solution. The Council has also approved the annexation study and a Casino Road subarea plan, both on April 8. Beyond that, the city has pointed to broader economic momentum — continued housing construction, new business licenses, the Boeing 737 North Line opening at Paine Field, and the Millwright District and Waterfront Place developments — as long-term revenue drivers. None of those arrive in time to close the 2027 gap on their own.

The decisions to watch are, in order: the annexation study’s findings, the fall 2026 budget proposal, whether the city places a regional fire or library question on the November 2026 ballot, and whether a new levy lid lift returns to voters in 2026 or 2027. Each decision narrows the set of remaining options. Taken together, they will reshape how Everett pays for its basic services for the next decade.

Frequently Asked Questions

How large is Everett’s 2027 projected budget deficit?

City finance staff project a $14 million general fund shortfall for 2027. That compares to a $12.6 million deficit in 2024 that resulted in 31 layoffs.

What is a Regional Fire Authority?

A Regional Fire Authority, or RFA, is a separate Washington government entity authorized under Chapter 52.26 RCW. It provides fire and emergency medical services across multiple jurisdictions and is funded by its own voter-approved property tax and benefit charges rather than through participating cities’ general funds.

Would a regional fire or library authority raise my property taxes?

Not usually on day one. The new RFA or library district levy is typically offset by a reduction in the city’s general levy. Over time, however, these districts have more flexibility to raise their own levies than cities do under state law.

Why didn’t the 2024 Everett levy lid lift pass?

Voters rejected it, with the measure falling well short of approval. The proposal would have raised Everett’s property tax levy from $1.52 per $1,000 of assessed value to $2.19 per $1,000 — about $336 per year more for the average homeowner.

Is regionalizing libraries the same as closing them?

No. Under regionalization, Everett’s libraries would continue operating but would be run by the Sno-Isle Libraries district, which already serves most of Snohomish County. Residents would continue to have library service. The change is on the funding and governance side.

When will Everett decide which of these levers to use?

Mayor Franklin is expected to present a preliminary 2027 budget proposal to the City Council in the fall of 2026. Any ballot measures for the November 2026 general election would need to be finalized by early August. The annexation study is expected to conclude in late 2026 or early 2027.

How does the 1 percent property tax cap work?

Under Initiative 747, which voters approved in 2001, most Washington cities can only raise their regular property tax levy by 1 percent per year without going to voters. Costs for public services generally rise faster than that, which is the root cause of Everett’s structural deficit.

Do annexation, regionalization, and levy lifts cancel each other out?

No — each addresses a different piece of the budget. Regionalization moves costs off the general fund. Annexation grows the tax base. A levy lift raises the rate on the existing base. Policymakers often pursue combinations of these tools together rather than choosing one.