We Built a Tiny Site for a New F1 Track. The Clicks Were Small. The Citations Were Not.

Tygart Field Case still: operator desk, laptop sidecar, cream folio, one amber lamp.

About Will

I run a multi-site content operation on Claude and Notion with autonomous agents — and I write about what we do, including what breaks.

Connect on LinkedIn →

In July we bought a domain, wrote a bilingual visitor guide, and put it on a Cloud Storage bucket. Twenty pages. No ticket shop. No newsroom. The first Madrid Formula 1 weekend in 45 years was coming to a new circuit called MADRING, and we wanted to see what happened if a small independent site showed up early with the boring answers: how to get there, when the lights go out, what you can bring.

The race is this weekend — 11 to 13 September 2026. Tickets are sold out. Organizers are talking about 350,000 people over three days, about 40 percent from outside Spain, led by Britain, the United States, and Mexico. The numbers below are not that crowd. They are the sliver of it that found racemadrid.com in Bing before Thursday of race week.

This is a field note, not a case study with a bow on it. The data stops on 8 September. Google Search Console is a separate pile. What we have is honest enough to be useful.

The experiment, short

Spanish primary, English secondary. Static HTML generated from a content file, synced to gs://racemadrid.com, Cloudflare in front. Independent-guide disclaimer on every page. Official times were supposed to stay “pending” until the promoter published them. We later locked a Sunday race time of 13:00 off an older F1.com page. Official MADRING time is 15:00. That error is still on the live site as I write this. It is also the most-clicked kind of question in the logs.

We did not build a media company. We built a briefing.

Two scoreboards

Classic Bing search, 24 July through 8 September:

MeasureNumber
Impressions7,959
Clicks144
CTR1.81%
First non-zero impression7 August (1 impression)
Peak impressions1,458 on 7 September
Peak clicks17 on 8 September

Bing AI citations over the same window:

MeasureNumber
Total citations3,218
Citations on 7 September792
Citations on 8 September933
Pages cited on 8 September11

On 8 September the model quoted the site 55 times for every human click. That ratio is the whole article.

Who typed, and from where

Country report from Bing Webmaster (impressions / clicks):

MarketImpressionsClicksCTR
United Kingdom2,250502.22%
Unknown / WW2,152341.58%
Spain1,411251.77%
United States1,165231.97%
Germany28341.41%
Canada11743.42%
Italy16531.82%
France20910.48%
Japan, China, Brazil20700%

Britain is the top click market on a Spanish event site. That is not a local-news audience. It is the incoming 40 percent that IFEMA described: people with flights, trying to learn a circuit that did not exist last year. Canada’s 3.4% CTR is the same English travel cluster, just smaller.

Device split is even less “I’m on the Metro”:

DeviceImpressionsClicksCTRAvg. position
Desktop7,2981231.69%6.0
Mobile661213.18%5.4

Ninety-two percent of impressions are desktop. Mobile CTR is better when it shows up. Bing’s audience is laptop-shaped anyway, but the queries match planning-from-work more than standing-in-line: hotel to track, gate open time, can I bring a bag.

What they wanted on the page

Microsoft Clarity, week of 30 August to 5 September — before the last spike:

On-siteNumbervs prior week
Sessions107+18%
Pages per session1.1−3.5%
Scroll depth77.7%+8%
Session duration2.08 min+59%
Rage clicks0%flat
JavaScript errors0%flat
Dead clicks7.5%+13%

They land, they read almost the whole page, they leave. That is a briefing, not a browse. Dead clicks are the only complaint: they tap the countdown, a map, or a heading that looks like a button.

Page-level Bing clicks tell the same story. The English home takes most of the volume. The schedule pages earn the click.

PageImpressionsClicksCTRAvg. position
/en/5,047671.33%6.1
/en/schedule/732273.69%4.4
/horarios/632142.22%5.0
/45291.99%7.0
/en/circuit/40892.21%5.3
/en/faq/25883.10%6.1
/en/getting-there/4250%2.0
/en/tickets/2229.09%4.2

English out-clicks Spanish on this dataset. /en/ alone is 67 of 144 clicks. The official site is bilingual and strong. We still caught the traveler who searched in English for a Spanish street circuit.

What they typed

The keyword export is 397 queries. 286 of them got zero clicks. The ones that did click were not “who wins.” They were already ticketed, or trying to finish packing.

  • What time will the grand prix in Madrid be over on Sunday 13th
  • Is the Madrid GP cash free?
  • Can I pay with bank card at Madrid Grand Prix
  • Do the organisers check ID when entering
  • Madrid F1 can you bring a GoPro
  • What time does MADRING open the gates for spectators
  • Novotel Madrid Feria to Madring
  • Is the Madrid Grand Prix alcohol free
  • 马德里f1地址

They also cannot spell the new name. Madring, Madridring, Madriring, Madriging, Mandring. That is a gift if you cover the misspellings on purpose. It is a trap if you only brand around the official word.

Official tickets are three-day passes only, and they are gone. That is why “Sunday-only ticket” and “can I walk around without paying” still show up. Those people are late. The official FAQ now says no day tickets.

What the model quoted

Citations by page:

PageCitations
/en/1,706
/en/circuit/423
/en/schedule/403
/horarios/334
/175
/circuito/46
FAQ, getting-there, tickets, race-weekthe rest

The queries Bing says it grounded on us are layout, dates, and the word Madring. Citation share on some of those is not a rounding error: “madrid f1 dates” 52%, “f1 madrid dates” 63%, “madrid f1 schedule” 40%. When the answer engine needs a timetable, it will lift a clean one from a 20-page site if the official page is still selling the weekend.

That is the difference between a click and a citation. A click is someone who still wants your URL. A citation is the model deciding you are safe enough to speak for. You do not get paid for the second one unless you already have a reason to own the sentence — a hotel, a transfer desk, a tour, a publisher with ads, a circuit that wants the record straight.

What the citation is worth

On this site, today, a citation is proof of position. It is not revenue. There is no affiliate running. There is no list. There is no ticket cut. The value sits in three places, and they are not equal:

  • For us: a clean field note, and a domain that already ranks for next year’s questions if we keep the pages honest.
  • For a Madrid incoming operator: cheaper than another year of ads against “how to get to Madring.”
  • For the official promoter: optional. They already own madring.com. They may not need racemadrid.com. They might still want the misspellings and the English FAQ not to drift.

A citation on a page that sells the wrong Sunday start time is a liability. That is why the next hour of work on this project is not a new URL. It is locking the timetable to MADRING and republishing the same 20 pages.

What we would not claim

  • That 144 Bing clicks is a business.
  • That desktop-heavy means “nobody uses phones at a Grand Prix.” It means Bing showed us planners.
  • That AI citations replace Google. This export is Bing Webmaster plus Clarity. Google is the missing chart.
  • That being cited is automatically good. It is good if the fact is right and you have a use for the attention.

What we would do again

Show up early on a named thing that does not have a settled official FAQ. Write the traveler questions in the language the travelers use. Keep the page short enough to scroll in two minutes. Put the clock in one place and keep it tied to the promoter. Do not invent a media brand around a weekend.

The models will quote you if the sentence is plain. The humans will click the schedule. Everyone else will go to the official site to buy a ticket that is already gone.

Sources: Bing Webmaster exports for racemadrid.com dated 10 September 2026 (performance through 8 September), Microsoft Clarity weekly digest for 30 August–5 September 2026, official MADRING schedule and organizer attendance remarks the week of the race. Earlier Tygart note on the same citation habit: The Bing Citation Mining Thesis.

Track the AI tools you actually use
Live, vendor-neutral prices & limits for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and more — and we’ll email you the moment your tools change price or limits. Free, no hype.
See the live AI tracker →or set up your alerts

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *