Tag: City of Everett

  • Everett Pipeline Project: Construction & Water Bills

    Everett Pipeline Project: Construction & Water Bills

    What does Everett’s $113 million pipeline project mean for me as a resident? Three things to plan for: (1) sustained construction along West Marine View Drive from approximately June 2026 through the end of 2027, (2) eventual upward pressure on water and sewer rates as the city absorbs the cost of the broader Port Gardner Storage Facility program, and (3) measurably cleaner Port Gardner Bay water once the system is operational — engineers project a 95% reduction in combined sewer overflows.

    This is the resident-side read of the $113 million pipeline core guide. The core walks through the engineering and the funding mechanism. This one walks through what it actually means for your driving, your bills, and your relationship with the bay.

    Your driving: assume the corridor changes

    West Marine View Drive between the Grand Avenue Bridge and Hewitt Avenue is going to be an active construction corridor for most of 2026 and 2027. That stretch is one of the most-driven roads in the city — it is the route between the north end and the downtown waterfront, the marina, and the port.

    The realistic posture: assume sustained lane impacts during pipe-trench excavation phases, plan an alternate route for any time-sensitive trips, and check the city’s project communication channels before driving the corridor at peak hours during construction windows. The lane configuration in place today is not the configuration that will be in place for much of the next 18 months.

    If you commute to the waterfront for work, watch for early communication on staging and night-work windows. The most disruptive phases of pipe replacement projects tend to be lifted into night and weekend windows when feasible, but the corridor is long enough that not every phase will fit that pattern.

    Your water bill: pressure, but not a single line item

    The $113 million for the pipeline is funded out of the city’s water and sewer utility fund. That money cannot legally be redirected to parks, police, or the general fund — utility infrastructure dollars stay with utility infrastructure. So the question is not “is this taking money from city services I use.” The question is “does this push my monthly utility bill higher.”

    The directionally honest answer: yes, projects of this scale put pressure on the utility rate-setting conversation. The $113 million pipeline is part of the broader Port Gardner Storage Facility program estimated at more than $200 million total. As the city carries the cost through bond issuances and ratepayer revenue, the rate calculus tightens.

    The exact monthly impact depends on bond structure, federal and state grant offsets, and the timing of the larger storage facility procurement. Watch for utility billing notifications and the public rate-setting meetings — those are where the line items become specific. The broader budget context for this rate pressure is in our complete 2027 budget deficit guide.

    Your bay: the actual win

    Combined sewer overflows are the reason Port Gardner Bay water quality has historically not been what it could be. When heavy rains overwhelm the city’s combined stormwater-and-sewer pipes, the system overflows at designated discharge points — sending a mix of rainwater and untreated wastewater into the nearest body of water. Port Gardner Bay and the Snohomish River have been the destinations.

    The Port Gardner Storage Facility, once built, will hold approximately 7 million gallons of excess flow during heavy rain events, then meter that flow through the treatment plant in the hours and days after the storm. Engineers expect approximately a 95% reduction in combined sewer overflow events.

    That is a measurable, tangible benefit that compounds over time — for shellfish health, recreational water use, ecological function, and the Port’s working waterfront character. If you have ever wondered why the city pours this much money into infrastructure no one will ever see, the bay is the answer.

    Your waterfront, in context

    The pipeline and storage facility are happening alongside a lot of other waterfront work. Read these as one connected story:

    • Waterfront Place at the Port of Everett — the restaurant row and tenant development
    • The Millwright District Phase 2 — apartments and commercial space
    • The Edgewater Bridge reopening
    • The broader Imagine Everett vision

    The combined sewer overflow infrastructure is the unglamorous foundation that lets the waterfront keep developing. Without it, future shoreline development gets harder.

    The practical resident calendar

    • Now through May 2026: Pre-construction planning, design finalization, watch for staging communications.
    • June 2026: Construction could begin. Watch for the first lane closure notices.
    • 2026-2027: Active construction along the corridor. Plan alternate routes for any peak-hour driving along West Marine View Drive.
    • End of 2027: Pipeline construction wraps. The Port Gardner Storage Facility’s separate construction timeline carries forward.
    • Multi-year: Combined sewer overflow events drop sharply once the full system is operational.

    What you can actually do

    • Subscribe to the city’s project notifications for West Marine View Drive (the city’s CSO program page is the master source)
    • Show up to the rate-setting public meetings — that is where utility bill impacts get decided
    • Plan an alternate route for waterfront-bound trips during 2026-2027 construction windows
    • Ask candidates running for council about utility rate strategy — the bills that come out of these projects are a council-level decision

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Will my water bill go up immediately?

    Not as a direct line item tomorrow. Utility rate impacts from infrastructure projects this large move through bond structures, grant offsets, and rate-setting meetings over time. Watch for utility billing notifications and the public rate-setting hearings for specifics.

    Will West Marine View Drive be closed during construction?

    Multi-month lane impacts are realistic for a project of this scope and corridor length. Full closures of the corridor are unlikely; phased lane closures with traffic-control management are the standard pattern. Watch the city’s project page for phase-by-phase closure schedules.

    What if I use the marina or the Port?

    Plan extra travel time during peak construction windows. Port and marina access remains; the corridor congestion is the variable. Marina users with shift-sensitive boat work should build a 15-minute buffer into trips during active construction phases.

    How clean will the bay actually get?

    Engineers project approximately a 95% reduction in combined sewer overflow events once the full system is operational. The bay will not become a different body of water overnight, but the cumulative water-quality, shellfish-health, and ecological improvements compound year over year.

    Could the project be cancelled or delayed?

    The Washington Department of Ecology has ordered the broader combined sewer overflow reduction program. The schedule is enforceable — material delays carry compliance risk. Funding can shift between bond and grant sources, but the project itself is not optional.

    Where does the money come from if not from my taxes?

    The $113 million is funded out of the city’s water and sewer utility fund, which is fed by utility ratepayer revenue and bond issuances. That fund is legally restricted to utility infrastructure and cannot be redirected to general government services like parks or police.


  • Everett Pipeline Project: Port Gardner Storage Guide

    Everett Pipeline Project: Port Gardner Storage Guide

    What is the $113 million Everett pipeline project? On April 2, 2026, the Everett City Council approved $113 million for the construction phase of new combined stormwater and sewer pipes plus a 48-inch water main replacement along West Marine View Drive — from the Grand Avenue Bridge in the north down to Hewitt Avenue in the south. The pipes feed the planned Port Gardner Storage Facility, a state-mandated combined sewer overflow project budgeted at more than $200 million that will hold approximately 7 million gallons of excess stormwater so it can be treated rather than discharged into Port Gardner Bay or the Snohomish River. Construction could begin as early as June 2026 and continue through the end of 2027. Engineers expect the facility to reduce combined sewer overflows by approximately 95%.

    The two projects, and how they work together

    What got approved on April 2 is the connective tissue. The $113 million pays for the pipes that carry the flow. Those pipes feed the Port Gardner Storage Facility — a separate, much larger project currently estimated at more than $200 million. The storage facility is the catchment basin; the pipes are the route. Without the pipes, the storage facility is a giant tank with no way to fill it. Without the storage facility, the pipes are oversized infrastructure with nowhere to send the flow.

    That is why the council is treating the funding as a single decision tree even though the dollar figures are split. The April 2 vote authorized the construction phase of the pipe component. The storage facility funding sits in its own approval and procurement track. Both have to land for the system to function.

    What the $113 million buys

    The ordinance allocates the construction-phase funding for three concurrent scopes inside the West Marine View Drive corridor:

    • A new combined stormwater-and-sewer pipe sized to carry significantly more flow than the existing system
    • Replacement of the existing 48-inch water main running along the same corridor
    • Connections that tie the new pipes into the upstream Port Gardner Storage Facility

    The corridor runs from the Grand Avenue Bridge at the north end of the waterfront down to Hewitt Avenue at the southern downtown waterfront — the entire length of the road that connects the north end of the city to the marina, the port, and the downtown waterfront.

    Why the state is making Everett build this

    Combined sewer systems are a 19th- and early-20th-century engineering pattern. In a combined system, stormwater and sanitary sewer share the same underground pipe. On a normal day that works fine. During a heavy rain, the system gets overwhelmed and the pipes do what they were designed to do as a safety valve — they overflow at designated points, sending a mix of rainwater and untreated wastewater into the nearest body of water.

    In Everett, the nearest bodies of water are Port Gardner Bay and the Snohomish River.

    The Washington Department of Ecology has been requiring cities with combined sewer systems to reduce overflow events for decades. Everett’s combined sewer overflow reduction program has been ratcheting down the number of allowed overflow events year by year. The Port Gardner Storage Facility — and the $113 million pipes that feed it — is the city’s response to the most recent compliance requirements. This is not an optional project. The state has ordered it. The schedule is enforceable. The $113 million is the price of compliance.

    The 7-million-gallon answer

    The Port Gardner Storage Facility, once built, will hold approximately 7 million gallons of excess stormwater during heavy rain events. Instead of overflowing into the bay, that flow gets metered out through the treatment plant in the hours and days after the storm. Engineers expect the facility to reduce combined sewer overflows by approximately 95%.

    The downstream effect is significant. Port Gardner Bay is the working waterfront, the marina, and an active recreational and ecological zone. Reducing overflow events there has water-quality, shellfish-safety, and habitat implications that compound year over year.

    Where the money comes from

    This is the part that often gets lost in the headline. The $113 million pipeline funding comes from the city’s water and sewer utility fund, not the general fund. That money cannot be redirected to parks, police, libraries, or general government. Utility fund revenue comes from utility ratepayers, and it is restricted to utility infrastructure spending.

    What that means in practice: the project is not a tradeoff against other city services. It does, however, sit inside the broader rate-setting conversation that determines water and sewer bills going forward. As the city carries the cost of large combined-sewer-overflow compliance projects, the pressure on ratepayer bills increases. That conversation runs in parallel with the budget deficit story already covered in our complete 2027 budget deficit guide.

    The construction footprint

    Construction could begin as early as June 2026 and continue through the end of 2027. The corridor — Grand Avenue Bridge to Hewitt Avenue along West Marine View Drive — is one of the most-driven roads in the city. It connects the north end of Everett to the downtown waterfront and the Port. Multi-month lane impacts are realistic for a project of this scope and length, particularly during pipe-trench excavation phases.

    For commuters, marina users, and waterfront business operators, the practical advice is to assume sustained corridor disruption and watch the city’s project page for phase-by-phase closure schedules. The lane configuration that exists today is not the lane configuration that will exist for much of 2026 and 2027.

    How this fits with the rest of the waterfront story

    The pipeline and storage facility are not happening in isolation. The waterfront is in active redevelopment — see the Waterfront Place complete guide, the Millwright District Phase 2, the Edgewater Bridge reopening, and the broader Imagine Everett vision. The combined sewer overflow infrastructure is the unglamorous foundation that makes everything above ground possible. Without compliance, future shoreline development gets harder. With it, the bay water quality story moves in the right direction over the next decade.

    What to watch next

    • June 2026 construction start signal — confirms the ramp into the heavy work
    • Port Gardner Storage Facility procurement milestones — the $200M-plus parent project
    • Department of Ecology compliance reporting on overflow events
    • Water and sewer rate notifications — the pass-through to ratepayers
    • Lane closure communications from the city — the operational impact

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What does the $113 million pay for?

    The $113 million funds the construction phase of new combined stormwater and sewer pipes plus replacement of an existing 48-inch water main along West Marine View Drive, from the Grand Avenue Bridge to Hewitt Avenue. The pipes feed the planned Port Gardner Storage Facility.

    What is the Port Gardner Storage Facility?

    The Port Gardner Storage Facility is a state-mandated combined sewer overflow project, currently estimated at more than $200 million, that will hold approximately 7 million gallons of excess stormwater during heavy rain events. Instead of overflowing into Port Gardner Bay or the Snohomish River, the stormwater is held until it can be treated.

    Why did the state require this project?

    The Washington Department of Ecology requires cities with combined sewer systems — older systems where stormwater and sanitary sewer share one pipe — to reduce overflow events. Everett has been ratcheting down its allowed overflow count for decades; this facility is the city’s response to the most recent compliance requirements.

    When does construction start?

    Construction could begin as early as June 2026. Work is expected to continue through the end of 2027.

    Where does the money come from?

    Funding comes from the city’s water and sewer utility fund. That money is restricted to utility infrastructure and cannot be redirected to general government services like parks or police.

    How much will combined sewer overflows be reduced?

    Engineers expect the Port Gardner Storage Facility, once operational, to reduce combined sewer overflows by approximately 95%.

    Will my water bill go up because of this?

    Utility infrastructure spending of this scale puts pressure on the rate-setting conversation that determines water and sewer bills. The exact rate impact moves with the broader utility fund and bond pictures; watch city utility billing notifications and the rate-setting public meetings for specifics.

    Will West Marine View Drive be closed?

    Multi-month lane impacts are realistic for a project of this scope and corridor length. Watch the city’s project page for phase-by-phase closure schedules; the lane configuration in place today is not the configuration that will be in place for much of 2026 and 2027.


  • Everett EMS Levy: Pro and Con Committee Volunteers Needed

    Everett EMS Levy: Pro and Con Committee Volunteers Needed

    How does Everett’s EMS levy Pro and Con committee process work? The City of Everett is recruiting volunteers to serve on Pro and Con committees that will write the official 250-word arguments for and against the August 4, 2026 EMS levy ballot measure. Applications close at 11:59 p.m. Monday, April 27, 2026. The City Council appoints committee members at the April 29, 2026 meeting. Statements are due to Snohomish County Elections by May 7, with rebuttals due May 11. Committee members’ names are printed in the local Voters’ Pamphlet alongside their statement.

    If you have an opinion on Everett’s EMS levy and you want it printed in the official Voters’ Pamphlet that lands in every Everett mailbox before the August 4 primary, here’s the deal: the city needs your application by 11:59 p.m. tomorrow night, Monday, April 27, 2026.

    This isn’t writing a letter to the editor. This is a statutory role. Under Washington State law (RCW 29A.32.280), when a jurisdiction puts a measure on the ballot, the city has to appoint a committee for and a committee against. Those committees draft the words voters read.

    What this measure does and what’s at stake

    The Everett City Council voted at its April 22, 2026 meeting to place an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) property tax levy lid lift on the August 4, 2026 primary ballot. If voters approve, the EMS levy rate would be restored from approximately $0.36 per $1,000 of assessed value back to $0.50 per $1,000 — the rate Everett voters originally approved in 2018.

    For a typical home in Everett, restoration works out to roughly $5 to $8 per month. The city’s published yearly examples:

    • $450,000 home → +$63 per year
    • $575,000 home (the 2026 city average) → +$81 per year
    • $700,000 home → +$98 per year

    EMS levy funding supports approximately 78 positions at the Everett Fire Department — the firefighter-paramedics and EMTs who answer the bulk of 911 calls. EMS calls made up about 82% of Everett Fire dispatches in 2025; the department responded to more than 25,700 total calls last year, an increase from 22,955 in 2018.

    “Emergency medical services are a critical part of how we serve our Everett community every day,” Mayor Cassie Franklin said in the city’s April 22 press release announcing the ballot measure. “This measure provides our residents with the opportunity to sustain and support robust, high quality and timely emergency care as our community and service demand grows.”

    That’s the city’s framing, and it is one side of the argument voters will see. The other side gets equal space in the pamphlet — and that side has to come from somewhere. That somewhere is the Con committee.

    What a Pro or Con committee actually does

    Per the city’s published process and Snohomish County Elections rules, here’s what you sign up for:

    • Write a 250-word-maximum statement. Pro committees argue for approval. Con committees argue for rejection. Word counts are strict — Snohomish County Elections enforces the limit.
    • Work independently from the City. Once appointed, committees operate without city involvement in the drafting. The city doesn’t review or edit your argument.
    • Optionally write a rebuttal. After the statements are filed, each committee can read the other side’s statement and write a shorter rebuttal.
    • Have your name printed in the local Voters’ Pamphlet alongside your statement. This is on-the-record civic participation, not anonymous.

    The structure is meant to give voters a clean apples-to-apples view: the city’s neutral fiscal explainer, the proponents’ case, the opponents’ case, the rebuttals, and the official ballot title. People who want to fight this measure in print, and people who want to defend it in print, get the same number of words and the same distribution channel.

    The deadline calendar — short and unforgiving

    Snohomish County Elections runs a tight timeline. Miss any of these and you’re out:

    • Monday, April 27, 2026, at 11:59 p.m. — Application deadline to volunteer for either committee. Online application form. Late or incomplete applications are not accepted.
    • Wednesday, April 29, 2026 — Everett City Council appoints committee members at its meeting.
    • Friday, May 1, 2026 — City submits committee appointments to the Snohomish County Auditor.
    • Thursday, May 7, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. — Pro and Con statements (≤250 words each) due to Snohomish County Elections.
    • Monday, May 11, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. — Rebuttal statements due.

    From sign-up to filed argument, you have about two weeks. Most of that two weeks is just waiting for council appointment and reading the opposing committee’s statement to draft your rebuttal.

    Who gets picked and why

    The application form goes to the City of Everett Fire Department, but the appointing body is the City Council. There’s no formal qualification beyond being an Everett resident willing to put your name to a public position on a ballot measure. In practice, councils often appoint people who have previously testified at council on related issues, who are active in neighborhood associations or relevant advocacy groups, or who have professional context for the question (a retired firefighter for the Pro committee, a tax-policy critic for the Con committee, for instance).

    If both Pro and Con receive multiple qualified applicants, the council selects the committee that best represents the position. If a side receives zero applicants, the city is required to make an effort to find someone — but the statement may end up shorter, signed by fewer people, or in rare cases not filed at all. That last outcome leaves only the city’s neutral explainer and the ballot title in the pamphlet, which historically benefits the Pro side.

    What the Con argument might look like

    This is where the levy debate actually lands. The neutral case for “yes” is well documented in the city’s release: rising call volume, capped 1% revenue growth under state law, restoration of a previously voter-approved rate.

    The case for “no” tends to draw from a few standard angles, each of which the Con committee would have 250 words to make:

    • Property tax fatigue. Everett homeowners are also weighing other levies, special districts, and a structural 2027 general fund deficit that has the city looking at additional revenue measures.
    • The 1% growth limit’s purpose. Initiative 747 (and subsequent legislation) was passed to constrain property tax growth on purpose. A lid lift is a vote to override that constraint.
    • Service-level questions. Whether the additional revenue is the only path to maintain the EMS service level, versus reallocation from other funds.
    • Scope of the levy lid lift. The temporary two-year structure (2027–2028) means the question will be back. Some voters object on principle to a recurring revenue lift.

    None of these are the city’s framing. That’s the point. Pro/Con committees exist precisely because the neutral fiscal note can’t carry the political argument on its own.

    What the Pro argument might look like

    Likely framing for the Pro committee, which would also have 250 words:

    • Restoration, not increase. Voters previously approved $0.50 per $1,000 in 2018; the levy has been eroded by the 1% cap, not voted down.
    • Call volume math. 25,700 calls in 2025 versus 22,955 in 2018, with EMS as 82% of dispatches.
    • Cost in personal terms. About $5–$8 per month for the median Everett homeowner.
    • Direct connection to staffing. Approximately 78 firefighter-paramedic positions tied to the levy.
    • Quote from Fire Chief Dave DeMarco in the city release: “Our firefighters and EMS personnel respond 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year to a wide range of emergencies, with the majority involving medical care. EMS funding supports the personnel, training, and equipment needed to respond effectively and provide care when it is needed.”

    What residents should actually do

    For the next 24 hours or so, the action item is concrete:

    • If you want to write the Pro or Con argument: apply by 11:59 p.m. Monday, April 27, 2026 at the city’s online form. To request accommodations, email communications@everettwa.gov.
    • If you want to watch the appointment vote: Wednesday, April 29, 2026, 12:30 p.m. council session, William E. Moore Historic City Hall / Police North Precinct, 3002 Wetmore Ave., or the council livestream on the city website.
    • If you want background on the levy itself: see the city’s EMS levy information page and the full April 22 city press release.
    • If you want to know more about how Pro/Con committees work in Snohomish County: the Snohomish County 2026 District Guide spells out the rules. For procedural questions, call Snohomish County Elections at (425) 388-3444.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Do I get paid to serve on a Pro or Con committee?
    No. These are unpaid volunteer roles. The compensation, in a sense, is having your name printed alongside your argument in a document that gets mailed to every registered voter in Everett.

    Can I serve on the Pro committee if I work for the city?
    City employees and elected officials are typically excluded from these roles to keep the committees independent. The form will flag eligibility issues. If you’re unsure, the city’s communications office can clarify.

    What if I want to argue against the levy but I’m not sure I can write a 250-word legal-style statement?
    You can apply, get appointed, and work with the other committee members on drafting. The committee can include up to a small number of named members; the statement is collective.

    What’s the difference between the local Voters’ Pamphlet statement and a campaign committee?
    A campaign committee — a registered Political Action Committee (PAC) — raises money, runs ads, and reports to the Public Disclosure Commission. The Pro/Con committee under RCW 29A.32.280 is purely about writing the official statements that go into the pamphlet. You can do one, the other, or both.

    What happens if no one applies for the Con committee?
    The city has to keep trying to recruit. If a committee can’t be seated by the deadline, the pamphlet will run only the available statements, which historically benefits whichever side did organize. That’s a significant reason civic groups pay attention to these deadlines.

    How is this levy different from the City Council’s other tax proposals?
    This one is voter-decided in August. The 2027 general fund gap involves separate options the council has been discussing, including potential annexation, joining a Regional Fire Authority, library regionalization, and another levy lid lift. The August 4 EMS levy is its own ballot question; voters can support or oppose it independent of any other future measure.

    If I miss the April 27 deadline, is there any other way to write into the official pamphlet?
    Not for this measure cycle. The voter pamphlet statements are limited to the formally appointed Pro and Con committees. You can still write to the local newspapers, write to the council, or organize a campaign committee — but the words printed in the pamphlet next to the ballot title come from the committees only.

    The bottom line for Everett

    The August 4 EMS levy is going to the voters with or without volunteer committees. But the words those voters read in their official pamphlet are about to be written by a small number of Everett residents who decide, in the next 24 hours, to put their name on the page. If you have a position — for or against — the path to having that position printed in every Everett ballot envelope is open until 11:59 p.m. Monday.

    Sources

  • Everett Mobile Home Zoning: New NR-MHC Zone Details

    Everett Mobile Home Zoning: New NR-MHC Zone Details

    What is the NR-MHC zone Everett is proposing? The Neighborhood Residential – Manufactured Home Community (NR-MHC) zone is a new land use category the City of Everett is creating to protect seven existing manufactured home parks from being redeveloped into other uses. The proposal amends Sections 15.02 and 19.03–19.13 of the Everett Municipal Code and repeals Title 17 (Mobile Home Parks). The Everett City Council holds a public hearing on the ordinance on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in council chambers at 3002 Wetmore Ave.

    If you live at Creekside, Fairway Estates, Lago De Plata Villa, Loganberry, Mobile Country Club, Silver Shores Senior, or Westridge, the City of Everett is about to put your community on the zoning map in a way it has never been before — and the public hearing is May 6.

    The proposal creates a new zoning designation called Neighborhood Residential – Manufactured Home Community (NR-MHC). In plain language, that means the underlying land where these seven parks sit can no longer be quietly rezoned for apartments, retail, or anything else without the city explicitly saying so. The new zone is a fence around the use itself, not just the buildings.

    For people who own the home but rent the lot, that’s the difference between knowing where you live in five years and not.

    What this ordinance actually does

    The proposed code amendment, posted by Everett Planning – Public Notices on April 10, 2026, would do four things at once:

    • Create the new NR-MHC zoning category in Title 19 EMC (Sections 15.02, 19.03, 19.04, 19.05, and 19.13).
    • Apply the new NR-MHC zone to seven specific manufactured housing communities (the addresses are below).
    • Repeal Title 17 of the Everett Municipal Code — the older “Mobile Home Parks” chapter — folding that regulation into the unified development code.
    • Implement two specific policies from Everett’s adopted Comprehensive Plan:
      • HO-10: Protect manufactured/mobile home communities from redevelopment into other uses.
      • HO-19: Collaborate with local partners to preserve and maintain affordable housing units.

    Goal 4 of the Comprehensive Plan, which the city is invoking here, reads: “Ensure equitable access to opportunity and housing choice throughout the city’s neighborhoods so that all residents may choose their neighborhood.”

    The seven communities being put on the map

    Per the city’s public notice, the new NR-MHC designation would apply to:

    • Creekside Mobile Home Park — 5810 Fleming St.
    • Fairway Estates Mobile Home Park — 1427 100th St.
    • Lago De Plata Villa — 620 112th St.
    • Loganberry Mobile Home Park — 9931 18th Ave. W.
    • Mobile Country Club — 1415 84th St.
    • Silver Shores Senior Mobile Home Park — 11622 Silver Lake Road
    • Westridge Mobile Home Park — 7701 Hardeson Rd.

    That’s roughly the manufactured-housing population of Everett’s south end, plus a chunk of the Silver Lake area. Several of these are 55+ communities. Several have been in place for decades. None of them, until now, have had a zoning designation that says “this is a manufactured home community and that’s the use we’re protecting.”

    Why this matters more than a typical code update

    Manufactured home parks are one of the only forms of unsubsidized affordable homeownership left in Snohomish County. The standard pattern in Puget Sound over the last 20 years has been straightforward and unkind: a park sells, residents get notice to relocate, and the land is redeveloped into apartments or townhomes. Households that owned their manufactured home but rented the lot lose the home equity they had — moving a manufactured home is often more expensive than the home is worth, and many older units can’t legally be relocated under current code at all.

    The NR-MHC zone doesn’t make a sale impossible. It does make redeveloping the land into a different use a slow, public, and explicit process — one that requires the city to actively rezone the parcel out of the protected category, with the corresponding hearings and political visibility.

    That’s the tradeoff the city is asking residents and property owners to weigh. A landowner gives up the ability to swap to a higher-value use without a zoning fight. The community gains time, predictability, and a place at the table.

    The HO-10 policy, in plain English

    HO-10 — “Protect manufactured/mobile home communities from redevelopment into other uses” — has been on the books in the Everett Comprehensive Plan as adopted policy. The NR-MHC zone is the implementation tool. Comprehensive plans are aspirational; zoning ordinances are how they actually bind. This is the city moving an aspiration into the ordinance code.

    HO-19 — “Collaborate with local partners to preserve and maintain affordable housing units” — sets the broader frame. The state Housing Trust Fund, nonprofit park-acquisition models like ROC USA, and Snohomish County’s preservation programs all become more effective when the underlying land use is locked in. Without a zone, those programs are buying parks that could still be rezoned. With a zone, they’re buying parks the city has formally committed to keeping as housing.

    What residents and owners can actually do before May 6

    The public hearing is the formal step. The council has already taken first action; earlier procedural votes occurred in January 2026. The May 6 hearing is the council’s last formal opportunity to take public testimony before voting.

    If you live in or own one of the seven parks:

    • Read the public hearing notice and the proposed ordinance language at the city’s posted PDF.
    • Submit written comment to the city before the hearing — written comment becomes part of the record and is read by council members ahead of the vote.
    • Show up at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, in council chambers (3002 Wetmore Ave., 3rd floor), or join the hybrid video link the city posts on the meeting agenda.
    • Sign up for public comment at the meeting if you want to speak. Each commenter typically gets two to three minutes.

    If you have a related comprehensive plan or zoning map change you want considered alongside this: the city is also accepting specific amendment requests — applications to change the comprehensive plan text, the land use map, or Title 19 EMC — until 5 p.m. Monday, May 4, 2026. Pre-screening meetings are available; contact Planning at (425) 257-8810 or Everett2044@everettwa.gov.

    The bigger picture for Everett’s housing inventory

    Manufactured housing parks aren’t huge inventory in absolute terms — the seven communities together represent a few hundred to perhaps a thousand homes — but they punch well above their weight in unsubsidized affordability. A manufactured home in Snohomish County typically lists below $200,000 even in an environment where the median single-family list price is multiple times that. Every household kept in a manufactured home is a household not absorbing rental supply elsewhere in Everett.

    The city’s 2044 Comprehensive Plan target for total housing units is in the tens of thousands. Compared to that, NR-MHC is a small piece. But it is one of the clearest pieces — a discrete decision the city can make once that compounds for decades.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Does the NR-MHC zone freeze rents at the affected parks?
    No. Land use zoning controls what can be built or operated on a parcel. It does not control lot rents, which are governed separately. A separate body of state law — and any private lease — governs the rent paid by manufactured home owners to park owners.

    Does NR-MHC stop a park owner from selling?
    No. Owners retain the right to sell. What changes is what a future buyer can use the land for. Without a zoning amendment, the buyer is purchasing a manufactured home community — that’s what NR-MHC permits. A future owner who wanted a different use would need to apply to rezone, which is a public process.

    Why is the city repealing Title 17?
    Title 17 EMC is the older “Mobile Home Parks” chapter that predates Everett’s unified development code. The city is consolidating that regulation into Title 19 EMC and the new NR-MHC zone, so all land-use rules live in one place.

    Can the new zone be undone later?
    A future council could amend zoning code, just like any council can. But the NR-MHC zone moves the default from “park can be redeveloped unless someone fights it” to “park stays unless the city actively rezones it.” The political cost of removing the protection is meaningfully higher than the cost of never adopting it.

    What happens at the May 6 hearing if the council approves the ordinance?
    The ordinance takes effect after the council vote (typically with a short waiting period for publication). The new NR-MHC designation appears on the zoning map. Existing parks continue to operate as they do now; the zoning simply matches the use that’s already there.

    I don’t live at one of the seven parks. Why should I care?
    Two reasons. First, the same redevelopment pressure that affects manufactured home parks affects other older, more affordable housing across Everett — apartment complexes, older single-family neighborhoods. How the city handles this ordinance signals how it’ll handle the next one. Second, displaced households don’t disappear; they move into the rest of the rental market and the rest of the city’s housing inventory.

    The bottom line for Everett

    The NR-MHC zone is one of those quiet, technical, slow-moving ordinances that disappears into a code book and then quietly does its job for thirty years. May 6 is the day to weigh in if you have a stake in any of the seven parks, or in how Everett protects its remaining unsubsidized affordable housing.

    Sources

  • Broadway Pedestrian Bridge: Everett Approves $3.1M Design

    Broadway Pedestrian Bridge: Everett Approves $3.1M Design

    What did Everett approve for the Broadway pedestrian bridge? On April 23, 2026, the Everett City Council approved a $3.1 million contract with engineering and planning consultancy Kimley-Horn to design a pedestrian bridge over Broadway in north Everett. The bridge will connect Everett Community College’s main campus to the Learning Resource Center on the east side of Broadway, with a connection that also serves the WSU Everett campus. The design is expected to be complete by the end of 2028. The bridge will likely be located just north of 10th Street.

    There is a six-lane road in north Everett called Broadway that thousands of college students cross every weekday — most of them on foot, most of them on a tight schedule between classes, almost all of them at street level with cars. On April 23, the Everett City Council took the first step toward fixing that.

    The council approved a $3.1 million contract with engineering firm Kimley-Horn to design a pedestrian bridge over Broadway connecting Everett Community College’s main campus to the Learning Resource Center, the campus library and study building that sits across the road on the east side. The same bridge will also tie into the WSU Everett campus, which shares the same general area on Broadway just north of downtown.

    This is one of those projects that does not get covered the way a stadium vote or a waterfront groundbreaking gets covered, but that quietly shapes daily life for thousands of Everett residents. We watched the contract approval and dug into the scope to figure out what is actually being built and on what timeline.

    What the $3.1 million does, and what it does not do

    The first thing to understand about the April 23 vote is that it does not build a bridge. It pays for the design of a bridge.

    The $3.1 million contract with Kimley-Horn — a national engineering and planning firm with a Northwest office — covers the design phase only. That includes the structural engineering, the architecture, the geotechnical work, the traffic analysis, the utility coordination, the permitting work, the public outreach process, and the construction documents that a future contractor will need to actually build the structure.

    A pedestrian bridge over a six-lane arterial like Broadway is not a small piece of engineering. It has to clear traffic with adequate vertical clearance, accommodate emergency vehicle heights, meet ADA accessibility requirements end to end, handle Pacific Northwest weather and seismic loading, and connect cleanly to existing pedestrian paths on both campuses. Kimley-Horn’s contract covers all of that work.

    The design phase is expected to wrap up at the end of 2028. That is the realistic timeline for a piece of infrastructure of this complexity, and it accounts for the public engagement, environmental review, and permit process that has to happen before construction can be put out to bid.

    Once the design is complete, a separate council vote will approve the construction contract. That is a different ordinance, a different price tag, and a different timeline — and right now the city has not announced a target construction start date or estimated total cost for the build.

    Why a bridge here, specifically

    Everett Community College is one of the larger institutions in the city by daily population. The main campus sits on the west side of Broadway between roughly 22nd Street and Tower Street. The Learning Resource Center — which houses much of the library, study, and student services functions — is on the east side of Broadway. The WSU Everett campus sits in the same area, sharing facilities and a daily student population with EvCC.

    Today, students moving between buildings cross Broadway at street-level signalized intersections. Broadway in this stretch is a six-lane arterial that carries significant car traffic between north Everett and downtown, and the at-grade crossings introduce real conflicts between pedestrian flow and vehicle movement. During class change times — the 10-minute windows when several thousand students simultaneously try to get from one building to the next — the crossings get crowded, the wait times for cars stack up, and pedestrians and drivers end up in the same intersections under time pressure.

    A grade-separated pedestrian bridge eliminates the conflict. Students walk over the road. Cars do not stop. Class change becomes faster, safer, and more predictable for everybody.

    The likely location north of 10th Street puts the bridge close to the natural foot traffic between the main campus and the Learning Resource Center. The exact siting will be one of the design phase decisions over the next two and a half years.

    Why this fits Everett’s broader pattern

    The Broadway pedestrian bridge is part of a noticeable shift in how Everett is thinking about its right-of-way. The city has spent the last several years putting more weight on pedestrian and bike infrastructure as a deliberate policy choice — the new Edgewater Bridge that opens to traffic April 28 includes wide sidewalks and 5-foot bike lanes on each side, the Pacific Avenue Gateway project includes a public art installation at the Pacific entrance from I-5, and the multi-year work on downtown streetscapes has prioritized pedestrian-friendly design over pure vehicle throughput.

    The Broadway bridge fits the same pattern. North Everett is one of the densest pedestrian environments in the city — between EvCC, WSU Everett, the residential neighborhoods around them, and the commercial strips on either side of Broadway, this is a part of the city that is genuinely walked. Investing $3.1 million in design now signals that the city is willing to put real capital into making that walkability safer.

    It is also a partnership story worth noting. The bridge serves the EvCC and WSU Everett campuses primarily. The design and construction are being led by the city. That kind of city-and-institution coordination is the only way a piece of infrastructure like this gets built — campuses cannot construct in city right-of-way on their own, and the city cannot prioritize a single-purpose pedestrian crossing without a clear partner. The fact that the project moved from concept to a $3.1 million design contract suggests that all the parties involved have aligned on what they want and how to pay for it.

    What to watch over the next two and a half years

    A few specific things will tell us how this project actually evolves between now and the end of 2028.

    Watch the public engagement process. The city and Kimley-Horn will run multiple rounds of public input on the bridge design — siting, aesthetics, lighting, public art elements, how it connects to existing pedestrian paths, how it handles weather. Students, faculty, neighbors, and broader Everett residents will all have a chance to weigh in. The dates and meeting formats will be posted on the city’s project page as they firm up.

    Watch the alignment selection. Kimley-Horn will likely produce two to four candidate alignment options early in the design process. The exact location north of 10th Street, the angle of the bridge, the column placement and the connection points to existing campus paths are all decisions that will be made publicly. Each option has trade-offs around cost, traffic disruption during construction, sightlines, and how cleanly it ties into existing buildings.

    Watch the construction cost estimate when it lands. The $3.1 million is design only. The construction estimate will not be public until the design phase produces a real, biddable scope — likely in late 2027 or 2028. When it does land, it will be the number that determines whether the bridge actually moves to construction or whether the project stalls for funding reasons. Pedestrian bridges over six-lane arterials are not cheap, and the city will need to decide where the construction money comes from.

    Watch what happens to the on-the-ground experience for EvCC and WSU Everett students between now and the end of 2028. The bridge does not exist yet, and will not for several more years. In the meantime, signal timing improvements, crosswalk markings, and other interim safety measures at the existing at-grade crossings are within the city’s reach right now. The Broadway pedestrian bridge is the long-term answer. Better at-grade crossings are the bridge between now and the bridge.

    The honest read

    This is the kind of city-shaping decision that does not move the news cycle but moves a piece of the city. By the end of 2028, north Everett will have a fully designed pedestrian bridge over one of its busiest arterials, ready to put out to bid. By some point in the early 2030s, depending on construction funding and timing, that bridge will be carrying students between EvCC’s two main building groups every weekday.

    For a $3.1 million design vote that did not make a single regional headline, that is a meaningful piece of how the city actually changes over the next decade.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What did the Everett City Council approve on April 23, 2026?

    The Everett City Council approved a $3.1 million contract with engineering consultancy Kimley-Horn to design a pedestrian bridge over Broadway in north Everett. The contract covers the design phase only — including engineering, permitting, public engagement, and construction documents. A separate future council vote will be needed to approve the construction contract.

    Where will the Broadway pedestrian bridge be located?

    The bridge will likely be located just north of 10th Street on Broadway, connecting Everett Community College’s main campus on the west side of Broadway to the Learning Resource Center on the east side. The bridge will also connect to the WSU Everett campus, which shares the same area. The exact siting will be determined during the design phase.

    When will the Broadway pedestrian bridge be built?

    The design phase is expected to be complete by the end of 2028. After design is finalized, the city will need to put the construction phase out to bid and approve a separate construction contract. A specific construction start date and overall project completion date have not yet been announced.

    Who is designing the bridge?

    Kimley-Horn, a national engineering and planning consultancy, was awarded the $3.1 million design contract by the Everett City Council on April 23, 2026.

    Why does Everett need a pedestrian bridge over Broadway?

    Broadway in this stretch is a six-lane arterial carrying significant traffic between north Everett and downtown. Today, students moving between Everett Community College’s main campus and the Learning Resource Center on the east side of the road cross at street-level signalized intersections. A grade-separated pedestrian bridge eliminates the conflict between pedestrians and vehicles and improves safety and flow during class change times.

    How much will the Broadway pedestrian bridge cost in total?

    The $3.1 million approved on April 23 covers only the design phase. The construction cost estimate will not be public until the design phase produces a biddable scope, likely in late 2027 or 2028. Pedestrian bridges over multi-lane arterials are significant infrastructure projects and the construction cost will be set by the design once it is complete.

    What about students who need to cross Broadway right now?

    The bridge will not exist for several years. In the meantime, EvCC and WSU Everett students continue to cross Broadway at the existing signalized intersections. The city has tools for improving safety at those at-grade crossings — signal timing, crosswalk markings, signage — that are within reach in the near term while the bridge design and construction process plays out.

  • Everett Pipeline Project: $113M West Marine View Upgrade

    Everett Pipeline Project: $113M West Marine View Upgrade

    What is the $113 million Everett pipeline project? On April 2, 2026, the Everett City Council approved a $113 million ordinance funding the construction phase of new combined stormwater and sewer pipes plus a 48-inch water main replacement along West Marine View Drive, from the Grand Avenue Bridge in the north down to Hewitt Avenue in the south. The pipes will feed the planned $200 million-plus Port Gardner Storage Facility, a state-mandated combined sewer overflow project that will temporarily hold excess stormwater so it can be treated rather than dumped into Port Gardner Bay or the Snohomish River.

    There is a kind of Everett project that does not get a ribbon cutting and does not show up on most people’s mental map of the city, but that quietly determines what the waterfront looks like, smells like, and is allowed to be used for. Combined sewer overflows are at the top of that list. And on April 2, the Everett City Council voted to spend $113 million on the largest single piece of infrastructure addressing them in years.

    We have been watching this one for months because the dollar figure is enormous, the construction footprint runs along one of the most-driven roads in the city, and the underlying problem — sewage and stormwater dumping into Port Gardner Bay during heavy rains — is something the state has ordered Everett to fix on a schedule that does not move.

    Here is what the council actually approved, and what it means for the city.

    What the $113 million buys

    The ordinance allocates $113 million to the construction phase of new water, stormwater, and sewer pipelines along West Marine View Drive. The route runs from the Grand Avenue Bridge at the north end of the corridor down to Hewitt Avenue in the south — that is the entire length of the waterfront frontage road that connects the north end of the city to the downtown waterfront, the marina, and the port.

    Inside that corridor, the project includes:

    • A new combined stormwater and sewer pipe sized to carry significantly more flow than the existing system
    • Replacement of an existing 48-inch water main that runs along the same corridor
    • The connections needed to tie the new pipes into the upstream Port Gardner Storage Facility, which is the catchment basin the new pipes feed

    The pipe work itself is the visible part. The whole point of the pipe work is to feed the Port Gardner Storage Facility, which is a separate, much larger project — currently estimated at more than $200 million — that will hold excess flows during heavy rain events and meter them out for treatment instead of letting them overflow into the bay.

    The $113 million pipeline is the connective tissue. Without it, the storage facility is a giant tank with no way to fill it.

    Why the state is making Everett build this

    Combined sewer systems are an artifact of the way American cities built their underground infrastructure between roughly 1880 and 1950. In a combined system, stormwater and sanitary sewer share the same pipe. On a normal day that works fine. During a heavy rain, the system gets overwhelmed, and the pipes do what they were designed to do as a safety valve — they overflow at designated points, sending a mix of rainwater and untreated wastewater into the nearest body of water.

    In Everett, those nearest bodies of water are Port Gardner Bay and the Snohomish River.

    The Washington Department of Ecology has been requiring cities with combined sewer systems to reduce their overflow events for decades. Everett’s combined sewer overflow reduction program has been ratcheting down the number of allowed overflow events year by year. The Port Gardner Storage Facility — and the pipes that feed it — is the city’s response to the most recent compliance requirements.

    This is not an optional project. The state has ordered it. The schedule is enforceable. The $113 million spend is the price of that compliance.

    Where the money is coming from

    This is the part that often gets lost in the headline. The $113 million does not come out of Everett’s general fund. It cannot be used for parks, police, libraries, or anything else the city’s general budget covers.

    The money comes from the city’s water and sewer utility fund. That fund is fed by what residents and businesses pay on their water and sewer bills. It is legally restricted to water and sewer system uses, which is exactly what this project is.

    What that means in practice is that the pressure point for ratepayers is not now — the funds for this construction phase are being drawn from existing utility reserves and previously authorized borrowing — but over the long term as the utility recapitalizes those reserves through future rate decisions. Everett residents have already seen incremental increases in their water and sewer bills tied to the broader combined sewer overflow program over the last several years. This $113 million approval is consistent with the trajectory the utility has been on.

    It is also separate from the proposed utility tax increase that has been moving through council on a different track. That is general fund money. This is restricted utility fund money. Two different conversations, both important, easy to confuse.

    What construction looks like on the ground

    If you drive West Marine View Drive — the frontage road that connects the north end of the city, past the Naval Station gates, down past Legion Park and toward downtown — you are going to spend a lot of time over the next two years driving past construction.

    The pipe corridor runs underneath that road. Trenching a 42-inch combined pipe and replacing a 48-inch water main means digging significant sections of the right-of-way, staging materials, and managing traffic through a corridor that already carries Naval Station traffic, marina traffic, downtown commuters, and freight to the port.

    The city’s public works department has not yet released the full lane closure schedule for the West Marine View work tied to this approval, but the size of the spend and the length of the corridor make it almost certain that residents in north Everett, port users, and Naval Station personnel will see real impacts on their commutes once construction mobilizes.

    The Pacific Avenue pipeline work — a separate but related $1,000 linear foot, 42-inch pipe project between Pine Street and Chestnut Street that is scheduled to begin in summer 2026 — adds to the picture downtown. Together, these are the largest underground infrastructure projects the city has had in motion at one time in years.

    Why this matters beyond plumbing

    A few reasons this is worth paying attention to even if the words “combined sewer overflow” make your eyes glaze over.

    First, water quality. Every overflow event that does not happen is wastewater that does not enter Port Gardner Bay. The Port Gardner shoreline is the single most-used recreation corridor in the city — Howarth Park, Jetty Island, the marina promenade, the swimming and paddling that families do at the waterfront. Cleaner water there is a public health and quality-of-life issue, not just a regulatory checkbox.

    Second, the waterfront economy. The Port of Everett’s $1 billion Waterfront Place redevelopment, the Millwright District buildout, the new restaurants and apartments and the planned hotel expansion — all of it depends on Port Gardner Bay being a clean, swimmable, fishable waterfront. Combined sewer overflows are the single biggest threat to that economic story. The state knows it. The port knows it. The city knows it. The $113 million pipeline is part of the long unsexy work of protecting the asset that everything else is built around.

    Third, regulatory exposure. If Everett misses the state’s compliance schedule on combined sewer overflow reduction, the consequences are not abstract. Cities that fall behind on Ecology’s CSO orders face escalating enforcement actions, mandated additional spending under tighter timelines, and in extreme cases consent decrees that take spending decisions out of local hands entirely. Spending $113 million on a pipeline now is much less expensive than the alternatives a few years down the road.

    What to watch

    Three things to keep an eye on as this project moves into construction.

    Watch the construction schedule and lane closure announcements for West Marine View Drive. The city will publish them on its public works project page as they firm up. North Everett residents and Naval Station commuters in particular will want to plan around them.

    Watch the Port Gardner Storage Facility procurement and construction milestones. The pipe project is feeding a much larger storage facility, and the two have to land on a coordinated timeline for either to function. The storage facility is the bigger spend, the longer construction window, and the project that will most determine when Everett actually achieves its compliance targets.

    Watch the long-term utility rate trajectory. This $113 million is funded from existing utility reserves and authorized debt, but the cumulative cost of the city’s combined sewer overflow program — across this project, the storage facility, the Pacific Avenue work, and other planned upgrades — will eventually show up in water and sewer rates in the years ahead.

    The pipeline goes in the ground. The water gets cleaner. The waterfront keeps growing. That is the deal Everett is signing up for, and on April 2 the council put $113 million behind it.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What did the Everett City Council approve on April 2, 2026?

    The Everett City Council voted to allocate $113 million to the construction phase of new combined stormwater and sewer pipes, along with the replacement of an existing 48-inch water main, running along West Marine View Drive from the Grand Avenue Bridge in the north to Hewitt Avenue in the south.

    What is the Port Gardner Storage Facility?

    The Port Gardner Storage Facility is a planned, more than $200 million city-built underground tank designed to temporarily hold excess flows from Everett’s combined sewer system during heavy rain events, so the wastewater can be treated rather than overflow into Port Gardner Bay. The $113 million pipeline project will carry flows to the storage facility.

    Why does Everett have combined sewer overflows?

    Like many older American cities, Everett’s underground infrastructure includes a combined sewer system where stormwater and sanitary sewer flow through the same pipes. During heavy rain events, the pipes can be overwhelmed and overflow at designated points into the nearest body of water — in Everett’s case, Port Gardner Bay and the Snohomish River. The Washington Department of Ecology requires cities with combined sewer systems to reduce these overflow events on a state-enforced compliance schedule.

    Who pays for the $113 million pipeline project?

    The $113 million comes from the city’s water and sewer utility fund, which is funded by what residents and businesses pay on their water and sewer bills. Utility funds are legally restricted to water and sewer system uses and cannot be redirected to general government services like parks, police, or libraries.

    Will this project affect my commute?

    Construction will require significant trenching along West Marine View Drive, which is the frontage road between north Everett and the downtown waterfront. The city has not yet released the full lane closure schedule, but the size and length of the corridor make traffic impacts likely for north Everett residents, marina and port users, and Naval Station commuters once construction mobilizes.

    Is this related to the Pacific Avenue pipeline project?

    The two projects are part of the same broader combined sewer overflow program but are technically separate. The Pacific Avenue Pipeline Improvements project is a roughly 1,000 linear foot, 42-inch pipe between Pine Street and Chestnut Street downtown, with construction scheduled to begin in summer 2026. The West Marine View pipeline approved April 2 is a much larger, much longer corridor project on the waterfront frontage road.

    When will construction start?

    The April 2 approval funded the construction phase of the project. Specific groundbreaking and mobilization timing will be set as the city completes contractor procurement and finalizes lane closure and traffic plans for West Marine View Drive.

  • 2026 Charter Review: Everett & Snohomish Voter Guide

    2026 Charter Review: Everett & Snohomish Voter Guide

    Quick Answer: In 2026, both the City of Everett and Snohomish County are running active charter review processes — parallel, independent efforts that could reshape how local government works in the Everett area for the next decade. Charter reviews are the mechanism by which the foundational documents of local government get examined and, where voters approve, amended. The Everett review is looking at city council structure, mayoral authority, and citizen engagement processes. The county review is examining county council districts, the executive role, and the charter’s civil rights language. Both processes will produce ballot items that Everett-area voters will decide on in 2026 and 2027.

    What a Charter Is and Why It Matters

    A local government charter is the constitutional document for a city or county — the top-level rulebook that defines how the government is structured, what powers the council and executive have, and how citizens can petition, vote on, and change policy. The City of Everett operates under a charter adopted by voters and amended periodically. Snohomish County is one of only a handful of Washington counties that operates under a home-rule charter rather than the default county commission structure, which means voters there have direct authority to reshape county government in ways that voters in most Washington counties don’t.

    Charter reviews happen on a schedule set by each charter. The City of Everett’s charter calls for periodic review by a commission of appointed or elected residents whose job is to study the current charter, hold public hearings, and recommend amendments for the ballot. Snohomish County’s charter similarly provides for periodic review. In 2026, both review processes are running concurrently — a rare alignment that means Everett-area voters could see charter-related ballot items from both jurisdictions in the same election cycle.

    The City of Everett Charter Review in 2026

    The City of Everett’s 2026 charter review commission is actively working through the city’s charter section by section. The issues most frequently discussed in public sessions include the structure of city council representation (districts versus at-large, and the size of the council), the relationship between the mayor and the city council, the process by which citizens can propose ballot measures, and the charter’s language around open meetings and public records. These are foundational questions: the outcomes could determine whether Everett continues with its current strong-mayor structure, whether council districts are redrawn, and whether new citizen engagement mechanisms are added.

    Practical impact for Everett residents depends on which recommendations make it to the ballot and which voters approve. A charter amendment that restructures council districts could change which council member represents a given neighborhood. An amendment expanding citizen initiative rights could make it easier for residents to put policy questions directly to voters. An amendment changing mayoral authority could reshape how big-ticket decisions like the Everett Transit merger, waterfront development, and public safety policy get made. Residents who want to shape these outcomes should track charter commission meeting agendas and public hearings — both are the primary public input channels before recommendations go to the ballot.

    The Snohomish County Charter Review in 2026

    Snohomish County’s 2026 charter review ran in parallel at the county level. The elected Charter Review Commission was seated after the November 2025 election, held public sessions across the county (including Everett, Lynnwood, Edmonds, and Arlington), and in spring 2026 considered a wide working list — districts, the executive’s role, civil-rights language, contracting, and more. What actually reached the November 3, 2026 ballot is narrower: five county charter propositions (Props 1–5). For the current ballot guide — what each proposition does and what it means for Everett voters and businesses — see Snohomish County Charter Review: November 2026 Ballot Guide.

    For Everett residents specifically, the county charter review matters because Snohomish County delivers services that overlap directly with city life: the Sheriff’s Office provides patrol services in unincorporated areas just outside Everett and contracts for regional services inside Everett; the county court system handles felonies, family law, and civil cases for Everett residents; and county-wide programs like the Assessor’s Office, Public Health, and the Elections Division touch every Everett household. Amendments to the county charter can change the terms of any of those relationships.

    Where the Two Reviews Overlap and Where They Don’t

    The city and county charter reviews are legally independent — neither has authority over the other, and the ballot items they produce will be voted on separately. But the practical effects overlap in important ways. Both reviews are examining citizen engagement mechanisms, so amendments from either or both could change how residents interact with local government. Both are examining district boundaries, so residents could see changes to the geographic units that define their council and commission representation. And both are happening in a political environment where trust in local government, housing policy, public safety, and civil rights are active debates — meaning the charter questions are being asked against a backdrop of real policy stakes.

    Where they diverge: the city charter review is focused on Everett-specific governance questions and its outcomes affect only Everett residents. The county charter review’s outcomes affect all 800,000+ Snohomish County residents. That asymmetry matters for turnout and for which issues get the most attention at public hearings.

    How Residents Participate

    Both charter review processes ran on public input through 2026: commission meetings, written comments, public hearings, and neighborhood sessions. For the county review, the May 2026 hearing series and the May 29 commission vote are finished; the live decision for county voters is now the November 3 ballot (see the Props 1–5 ballot guide). City charter review follows its own calendar — check the city’s roster and agendas. Residents who want to shape outcomes should still vote on whatever charter items reach their ballot and, after Election Day, watch implementation of anything that passes.

    The Timeline: When Ballot Items Appear

    County charter amendments from the 2026 review are on the November 3, 2026 general-election ballot as Propositions 1–5 — details in our Snohomish County November 2026 ballot guide. The City of Everett’s charter review produces separate ballot items on its own schedule; check city election materials for what reaches Everett voters. Snohomish County Elections publishes final ballot composition for each cycle in advance of the election.

    How Civic Watchers Can Dig Deeper

    Beyond reading the ballot guides, residents who want to organize comments or track both commissions can use the same habits civic watchers use: follow both commission calendars, coordinate with local groups, write specific comments, and stay engaged through implementation after Election Day.

    The Coalition Landscape

    Several local civic organizations are actively engaged with one or both reviews. The League of Women Voters of Snohomish County typically publishes educational materials on charter amendments and hosts candidate and issue forums. Local neighborhood associations — including associations in Northwest Everett, Bayside, and the Port Gardner neighborhood — have in past charter cycles submitted joint comments on issues affecting their areas. Watchers who want to amplify their individual voice should consider joining or coordinating with one of these organizations. Coordinated comments from multiple residents on the same issue carry materially more weight than isolated individual submissions.

    Writing Effective Public Comment

    Public comment on charter review items is most effective when it is specific, references particular charter sections, and ties the recommendation to a concrete outcome. Comments that say “I support reform” are less useful to commissioners than comments that say “I support amending Section X to require Y, because it would produce Z outcome in my neighborhood.” Comments can be submitted in writing before meetings and delivered orally at public hearings. Both channels are part of the record. For civic watchers planning to submit comments on multiple items, a clean spreadsheet tracking which commission, which section, which hearing, and which outcome you support is a practical organizing tool.

    After the Ballot: The Implementation Phase

    Charter amendments that pass don’t take effect instantly. Each amendment has an implementation timeline specified in the ballot language or derived from state law — some take effect at the next election cycle, some require enabling ordinances from the council, and some require procedural changes at the Snohomish County Elections office. Watchers who engaged with the amendment campaign should plan to engage with implementation — that’s typically where the hardest details get settled, and where civic attention often drops just when it matters most.

    Frequently Asked Questions About the 2026 Charter Reviews

    Are the city and county charter reviews the same process?

    No. They are independent. The City of Everett’s review examines the city charter. The Snohomish County review examines the county charter. They happen to be running concurrently in 2026, but they produce separate ballot items and are decided by voters separately.

    Can charter reviews change everything about local government?

    In theory, yes, within state and federal law. In practice, charter reviews produce amendments — not full replacements. Voters decide each amendment separately.

    How do I know who my charter review commissioners are?

    The City of Everett publishes its charter review commission roster on the city website. Snohomish County does the same. Both include contact information for commissioners.

    What happens if I don’t vote on charter items?

    Charter amendments require majority voter approval to pass. If you don’t vote, you don’t shape the outcome, but the amendments don’t fail automatically — they pass or fail based on votes cast.

    Do these reviews affect Everett Transit, the waterfront, or other current issues?

    Indirectly, yes. Charter amendments can change how the city council and mayor make decisions on these items, which can affect outcomes. They don’t directly legislate on transit or waterfront policy, but they shape the rules under which those decisions are made.

    Related Coverage From Tygart Media’s Exploring Everett Series

  • Everett Charter Review: How to Shape the 2026 Ballot

    Everett Charter Review: How to Shape the 2026 Ballot

    What is Everett’s charter review, and why does it matter?
    Everett’s charter is the city’s constitution — the document that lays out how the mayor, council, and city departments work. Every decade, a 15-person volunteer committee reviews it and can send changes to the November ballot, where voters have the final say. The 2026 Charter Review Committee held its most recent public hearing on April 18 and is gathering resident input now. Any amendments Everett voters approve in November 2026 would reshape the city’s governance for the next ten years.

    Most Everett residents have never read the city’s charter. That is not unusual — most cities’ charters sit in municipal code and rarely come up in everyday conversation. But the charter is the document that decides who can be mayor, how many council members there are, whether they run by district or at-large, when residents vote on levies, and how the city manages its own finances.

    And every ten years, Everett gives voters a chance to change it.

    That process is happening right now. The 2026 Charter Review Committee — 15 volunteer residents appointed by the mayor and city council — has been meeting since earlier this year to review the charter, take public testimony, and draft recommended changes. The committee held a public hearing on April 18 at Walter E. Hall Park. Any amendments the committee recommends will need a council vote to reach the ballot, and then a majority of Everett voters to take effect.

    What the charter actually controls

    The charter is not the same as the municipal code. The municipal code is the big book of day-to-day rules — zoning, parking, noise ordinances. The charter is smaller and more structural. It answers questions like:

    • Is Everett a strong-mayor city or a council-manager city?
    • How many council members sit on the council?
    • Do they represent districts, the whole city, or both?
    • What are the term lengths for mayor and council?
    • How does the city handle its own initiative and referendum process?
    • What boards and commissions must exist?

    The last time Everett reviewed its charter was 2016. The biggest structural change residents have seen since then came from a separate voter decision in November 2018, when Everett switched from an all-at-large council to a mix of five district seats plus two at-large seats. That change did not come from a charter review — it came from an earlier ballot measure — but it is exactly the kind of question a charter review would take up.

    How the 2026 committee was put together

    Applications to serve on the committee closed in December 2025. In January 2026, the mayor and city council together designated 14 members. A 15th seat is chosen by the committee itself after it first convenes. Members are unpaid volunteers who commit to months of meetings.

    The committee works through two phases. First, members review each section of the current charter and flag potential changes. Second, they take public input, draft final recommendations, and vote on each one. An amendment only moves forward if a majority of committee members vote for it. The recommendation then goes to the Everett City Council, which can either send it to the ballot or decline.

    Only voters approve the final change. The council cannot amend the charter on its own.

    What the April 18 public hearing was for

    The hearing at Walter E. Hall Park on April 18 ran from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. in the Olympic View Room. The format was a standard public comment hearing: residents sign up, the committee listens, comments become part of the official record. The committee had already scheduled an earlier hearing in late March at the Evergreen Branch of the Everett Public Library, 9512 Evergreen Way, to make sure residents in both halves of the city had a chance to speak.

    Public hearings are the most visible part of the process, but they are not the only way to submit input. The committee has also accepted written comments electronically. The city posts committee meeting agendas and minutes on the Agenda Center at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter, and the Charter Review Committee has its own landing page at everettwa.gov/630/Charter-Review-Committee.

    What happens between now and November

    The timeline is tight. For amendments to reach the November 3, 2026 general election ballot, the committee has to finish its work, the council has to schedule and hold its own public hearings, and the county auditor’s office has to receive the ballot text on time. That typically means the committee’s final recommendations need to land with council through midsummer 2026, with council action targeted for August or early September 2026. Confirm status on the city Charter Review Committee page.

    Residents who missed the April 18 hearing could still weigh in while the committee process was open. Check the Charter Review Committee page for current meeting and ballot status. The city accepts written comments through the Charter Review Committee page. Once the committee finalizes recommendations, the council’s hearings will be separate opportunities for public testimony — another round of chances for residents to speak before the ballot is set.

    Why Everett residents should pay attention

    Charter amendments are the rare civic decision that the city council cannot make alone. Most ordinances — last month’s fair labor rules, the utility tax debate, the 2026 budget — move through council votes without ever reaching voters directly. The charter is different. Residents decide.

    That means what shows up on the November ballot is shaped by who bothers to testify right now. If a resident wants the mayor’s term shortened, the council expanded, initiative signature thresholds lowered, or a new board created to oversee a specific city function, the Charter Review Committee is the body that can put that on the ballot. If no one raises it during this window, it does not make the 2026 ballot — and the next chance is 2036.

    For a city the size of Everett — population roughly 115,000 and still growing — a decade is a long time to wait. The city that votes on this charter in November will be a different city by 2036. Boeing’s 737 North Line will be at full production. Sound Transit’s Link light rail is projected to reach Paine Field around 2037. The Millwright District and the downtown stadium will be built out. The charter that residents send forward this year will govern how Everett’s institutions respond to all of it.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When was Everett’s charter last reviewed?

    The last Charter Review Committee met in 2016. Everett typically reviews its charter about once every ten years.

    Who is on the 2026 Charter Review Committee?

    The committee has 15 members. The mayor and city council designated 14 of them in January 2026 from an applicant pool. The 15th seat was chosen by the committee itself at its first meeting. Members are unpaid volunteers serving a one-time term tied to this review cycle.

    Do voters get the final say on charter changes?

    Yes. The committee recommends changes. The council can put those changes on the ballot. Only Everett voters can actually amend the charter, by majority vote in the November 2026 general election.

    How can residents submit input now?

    The committee accepts public testimony at its scheduled hearings and also accepts written comments. The Charter Review Committee page at everettwa.gov/630/Charter-Review-Committee has the most current contact information, meeting schedule, and links to submit comments electronically.

    Is Everett’s charter review the same as Snohomish County’s?

    No. Snohomish County has its own Charter Review Commission with its own elected commissioners, reviewing the county charter. That body is separate from Everett’s city committee and considers different proposals — including, this cycle, whether county executive and council seats should be nonpartisan. Everett voters will see both sets of questions on the November ballot if both bodies send recommendations forward.

    When is the next chance to amend the charter after 2026?

    Not until the next decennial review, which would be expected around 2036. Individual council members can theoretically propose charter amendments outside of a review cycle, but the organized, public, committee-driven review only happens about once a decade.

    Deeper Coverage in the Exploring Everett Series

    For a more comprehensive treatment of the issues raised in this article, see:

  • Everett Stadium Vote: The $10.6M Interfund Loan Explained

    Everett Stadium Vote: The $10.6M Interfund Loan Explained

    The line that has received the least attention in coverage of Everett’s April 29 stadium funding vote is also the line that matters most for anyone trying to understand how the city’s general fund works: the money would come as an interfund loan from the general fund balance, not from new outside financing. For residents trying to square the stadium conversation with the $14 million 2027 budget gap the city has been publicly discussing, this is the detail that connects them.

    Here is a plain-language walk-through of what an interfund loan is, what the Outdoor Event Center is asking for on April 29, and why the mechanism matters for the next 18 months of Everett’s budget conversation.

    Quick answer: On April 29, 2026, the Everett City Council will vote on a $10.6 million funding request for downtown stadium design and property acquisition. The money would be transferred as an interfund loan from the city’s general fund balance and repaid from a future stadium bond measure. The city has already spent about $7.2 million on the project, and total projected stadium cost has risen from $82 million in June 2025 to $120 million as of January 2026. Three teams — the Everett AquaSox plus men’s and women’s USL clubs — have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments.

    What an Interfund Loan Is

    Most residents have a mental model of how cities pay for things: taxes come in, they get spent, bonds get issued for capital projects, grants cover specific line items. An interfund loan is a fifth mechanism that does not show up as often in public conversation.

    An interfund loan moves money between accounts the city already owns. In Everett’s case, the city has a general fund — the main checking account that pays for police, fire, parks, and general government — and several special-purpose funds dedicated to projects like capital construction, utilities, and stormwater. When the council authorizes an interfund loan, it moves cash from one of those funds (here, the general fund balance) to another (here, the stadium project fund) with the expectation that it will be paid back from a specific future source.

    What the money is not: it is not a new grant, a new tax, or money the city is borrowing from the public bond market right now. It is existing city cash being lent from one pocket to another.

    What makes the mechanism appropriate in this case, according to the administration’s framing, is that the stadium project will eventually issue a general obligation bond of more than $40 million to fund construction. The interfund loan bridges the gap between today’s design work and the point at which the bond gets issued. When the bond sells, the general fund gets paid back.

    What the $10.6M Actually Funds

    The April 29 request covers two activities:

    Stadium design completion. The stadium — formally the Outdoor Event Center — still requires a completed design package before it can move to construction bidding. The design package translates the 5,000-seat concept, the artificial turf field, the clubhouse that doubles as event space, and the walking perimeter into construction documents detailed enough to price and build.

    Property acquisition. The site requires 15 parcels. Consultant reports shared with the council indicate the city has signed purchase agreements on two parcels, has pending agreements on four more, and is in active negotiations with the owners of eight others. None of the purchases close unless the full stadium project moves forward, but the April 29 funding keeps the negotiation and signed-agreement work moving.

    The main entrance to the completed facility is planned at Wall Street and Broadway.

    What the City Has Spent So Far

    The city has already spent about $7.2 million in capital funds on the stadium project. Adding the $10.6 million request would bring cumulative city spending to approximately $17.8 million before any construction begins.

    Sports-team commitments partially offset that figure. The three teams that plan to call the stadium home — the Everett AquaSox, plus the men’s and women’s United Soccer League franchises — have committed $17 million upfront, with roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments promised afterward. Teams would handle day-to-day operations. Under the lease terms, the city would need to staff only one employee to oversee stadium operations, a point Mayor Cassie Franklin has highlighted as a lean-operation advantage.

    The city also has other funding sources stacked up:

    • $7.4 million from the state youth athletic fields fund
    • $5 million from Snohomish County phased across 2027 through 2030
    • A planned bond of more than $40 million

    Those sources together leave what consultant Ben Franz described during a recent briefing as approximately a $25 million funding gap relative to the current $120 million projection. Franz framed the city’s strategy this way: “The more upfront capital we’re able to secure, the less debt the city has to issue.”

    Why the Cost Has Moved from $82M to $120M

    When the city first brought a $4.8 million stadium funding measure to council in June 2025, the total project was estimated at $82 million. By January 2026, that figure had climbed to $120 million — a 46% increase over roughly seven months.

    Construction escalation in the Puget Sound region is the usual driver for a jump like that. Labor, steel, and concrete costs have all moved. Design refinements also play a role: as architects translate concept to documents, elements like seating configurations, accessibility requirements, and infrastructure tie-ins often expand the scope. A third factor specific to Everett is that the stadium is on a constrained urban site, not a suburban greenfield, which drives costs for things like utility relocation and site preparation.

    The opening date has slipped from April 2027 to late 2027, with construction now planned to start in September.

    Why the General Fund Connection Matters

    Here is where the interfund loan intersects with the rest of Everett’s civic conversation.

    The city is projecting a $14 million general fund deficit in 2027 and has been publicly evaluating four levers to close it: a regional fire authority, regional library services, another levy lid lift, or annexation of Mariner. Three of those require a public vote.

    An interfund loan from the general fund balance is different from a cut to the general fund. The loan gets repaid when the bond issues. But the balance is temporarily lower while the loan is outstanding, and general fund reserves are also what the city relies on to absorb mid-year surprises. A loan of $10.6 million is meaningful relative to a fund balance that, in most recent audited statements, operates in the low tens of millions.

    This is why the April 29 vote is not just a stadium vote — it is also a budget vote. Council members considering it are implicitly deciding how much short-term general fund flexibility they are willing to trade for keeping the stadium design schedule on track for a late-2027 opening.

    What Happens If the Vote Fails

    If the council declines the $10.6 million request, the design work cannot be completed on schedule, and property acquisition negotiations stall. The project does not die outright — the city would have to return to council with an alternative financing approach — but the late-2027 opening window would be at risk, and the teams that have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in long-term lease revenue would need to evaluate their position.

    If it passes, the city continues design work, keeps property acquisition conversations live, and heads toward the stadium bond issuance that repays the interfund loan.

    How to Watch the April 29 Vote

    The Everett City Council meets Wednesdays at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Everett City Hall, 3002 Wetmore Ave. The April 29 agenda will be posted to the Agenda Center at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter/City-Council-10. Meetings are livestreamed and archived; residents can also attend in person or submit public comment.

    For residents tracking the stadium conversation alongside the broader budget picture, the interfund loan is the place where the two stories meet.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the Everett City Council voting on April 29, 2026?

    A $10.6 million funding request to complete design of the downtown Outdoor Event Center (the AquaSox/USL stadium) and continue property acquisition on the 15-parcel site. The money would come as an interfund loan from the general fund balance, repaid from a future stadium bond.

    What is an interfund loan?

    A transfer of cash from one city fund to another, with a planned repayment from a specific future source. It is not a tax, grant, or public bond — it is existing city money moving between accounts.

    How much has Everett already spent on the stadium?

    About $7.2 million in capital funds so far. If the $10.6 million request passes, cumulative city spending reaches approximately $17.8 million before any construction starts.

    What is the total projected stadium cost?

    $120 million as of January 2026, up from $82 million in June 2025. Teams have committed $17 million upfront and roughly $100 million in 30-year lease payments. Other funding sources include $7.4 million from the state youth athletic fields fund, $5 million from Snohomish County, and a planned bond of more than $40 million.

    How does the interfund loan affect the general fund?

    The loan temporarily reduces the general fund balance by $10.6 million until the stadium bond is issued and the money is repaid. That is relevant because the city is also projecting a $14 million 2027 general fund deficit and evaluating options including a regional fire authority, library regionalization, a levy lid lift, or annexation.

    When does the stadium open?

    The target has moved from April 2027 to late 2027. Construction is planned to begin in September 2026. The facility is projected to draw 400,000 regional visitors annually.

    Who uses the stadium?

    The Everett AquaSox baseball team, a men’s United Soccer League team, and a women’s United Soccer League team. The teams will handle day-to-day operations, and the lease includes 50 guaranteed public-access days each year.

    How can residents weigh in?

    Attend the April 29 City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers (3002 Wetmore Ave.), submit written comment through the City Clerk, or watch the livestream archived through the city’s Agenda Center.

  • 2026 Everett State of the City: 5 Priorities for Residents

    2026 Everett State of the City: 5 Priorities for Residents

    When Mayor Cassie Franklin took the stage at Angel of the Winds Arena on March 5, 2026, for her ninth annual State of the City address, she framed the year ahead around a single idea: “One Everett.” Seattle Seahawks tackle and Archbishop Murphy alumnus Abe Lucas opened the speech. What followed was a mix of economic confidence, candid acknowledgment of the budget pressure the city is navigating, and a concrete list of initiatives residents can expect to see on the ground in 2026.

    Seven weeks later, several of those initiatives are already moving through City Hall — some toward the council for a vote, others into the permitting pipeline or grant applications. Here is a plain-language breakdown of the five priorities Mayor Franklin laid out, what has happened since, and what each one means for Everett residents.

    Quick answer: Mayor Franklin’s 2026 State of the City address laid out five priorities: long-term sustainable revenue to protect core services, public safety investments in policing and fire response, housing actions including pre-approved backyard cottage plans, a park-upgrade wave at Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill, and district-by-district community engagement. The Outdoor Event Center and FIFA World Cup watch parties at Boxcar Park were framed as anchor economic drivers for the year.

    Priority 1: Long-Term Sustainable Revenue

    The revenue priority is the one doing the most work behind the scenes. Franklin told the audience the city needs to “pursue continued economic growth and new pathways to long-term, sustainable revenue to protect core services.” That sentence sounds like standard political language, but it maps directly to the $14 million projected 2027 budget deficit the Finance Department has been discussing publicly since earlier this spring.

    What it means in practice: the city is actively evaluating four levers — forming a regional fire authority, regionalizing library services through a partnership with Sno-Isle, running another levy lid lift past voters, and continuing the annexation evaluation for Mariner. Three of the four require a public vote. The Mayor’s Office has not endorsed a specific path yet; the April 8 council vote that approved $200,000 for a Mariner annexation study and $50,000 for a Casino Road subarea plan was the first real money the city has put behind any of these options.

    For residents, this priority matters because it is the frame every other budget decision will sit inside for the next 18 months. Core services — police, fire, parks, libraries — are what the revenue conversation is designed to protect. How Everett decides to pay for them is the open question.

    Priority 2: Strategic, Community-Focused Public Safety

    Public safety had three sub-priorities in the address: strategic, community-focused policing, fire response capacity investments, and alternative crisis response programs. Each one is tied to staff the city has already hired or programs already running.

    On policing, Chief Robert Goetz — sworn in on January 7, 2026 — has been public about his goal of closing the EPD vacancy gap. Goetz told reporters in January the department was “down to 14, maybe 13 vacancies at this point” and said he hopes to push that number into single digits in 2026. The department promoted eight officers to sergeant, lieutenant, captain, and deputy chief in the two weeks before he was sworn in. Goetz’s stated approach — “I want our officers to get out of the car and visit with our community members because they’re the ones who are providing us with the feedback that we need to be the best police department that we can be” — is what the Mayor’s “strategic, community-focused” language points to.

    On fire response, the city is simultaneously evaluating whether to join a regional fire authority, which would restructure how fire service is funded and delivered. That decision is part of the revenue conversation above.

    On alternative crisis response, the Mayor’s Office has pointed to existing programs pairing behavioral health responders with police, though the address did not announce a new program. The expansion language was more about protecting what already exists through the budget cycle.

    Public safety also intersects with Mayoral Directive 2026-01, signed by Franklin on February 25, 2026. The directive restricts federal immigration agents from accessing non-public areas of city buildings without a judicial warrant, requires Everett police to record interactions at the scene of any immigration enforcement activity they are called to, and reaffirms compliance with the Keep Washington Working Act. The directive was not new policy announced at the State of the City; it is already in effect. But it establishes the guardrails the city will operate inside during 2026.

    Priority 3: Housing — Backyard Cottages and a New Boys and Girls Club

    The most concrete housing announcement was pre-approved backyard cottage plans designed to streamline the permitting process for accessory dwelling units. Pre-approved plans mean that homeowners who use one of the city’s templates can move through permitting faster than if they brought in custom drawings — reducing design costs and review time. The goal is to make ADUs a realistic option for more Everett households.

    Franklin also announced a new Boys and Girls Club at Walter E. Hall Park in Council District 4. That project is a partnership rather than a city-led build, but the site selection and the framing matter: Walter E. Hall Park sits south of the airport in an area the city has identified for family-focused investment.

    Neither the backyard cottage plans nor the Boys and Girls Club is solving housing affordability on their own. They are part of what the administration describes as a supply-side strategy — add more units, reduce friction in the permit process, add more third-place community infrastructure — while the broader Puget Sound housing market works itself out.

    Priority 4: Park Upgrades at Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill

    Three parks are getting meaningful work in 2026.

    Edgewater Park sits next to the Edgewater Bridge, which reopens April 28 after an 18-month closure and $34.9 million replacement. The park work is the natural companion to the bridge: new access, improved landings, and waterfront enhancements that make the reopened crossing feel connected to something on the west side.

    Garfield Park in the Riverside neighborhood is getting a major makeover that has been in public-engagement phase with neighbors for months. Exact scope depends on the final design package, but residents have already weighed in on the direction.

    Eclipse Mill Park on the riverfront is the long-timeline project. City staff confirmed earlier this spring that Eclipse Mill is now targeting a spring 2028 opening — later than initial hopes but reflecting both design complexity and funding sequencing. Eclipse Mill is designed to be Everett’s signature riverfront park when it eventually opens.

    Parks are also a quiet revenue story: well-maintained, high-quality parks are one of the more reliable drivers of residential property values, which in turn affect the city’s assessed value and long-term property tax base.

    Priority 5: District-by-District Community Engagement

    The final priority was the least flashy but the most interesting from a civic-engagement standpoint. Franklin announced that community meetings would be scheduled in each City Council district, following the success of the District 2 town hall. For residents, that means the Mayor’s Office is committing to show up in neighborhoods rather than only hosting conversations at City Hall.

    The significance is partly operational — getting seven districts worth of face-to-face feedback in one year is a real lift — and partly political. Three of the four budget levers on the table for 2027 require a public vote. An administration that has already sat down with voters in their neighborhoods has a better shot at explaining those ballot questions when they come up.

    The Economic Anchors: Outdoor Event Center and FIFA 2026

    Woven through the speech were two economic anchors. The Outdoor Event Center — the downtown stadium project that hosts Everett AquaSox baseball, United Soccer League men’s and women’s teams, and community events — is projected to draw 400,000 regional visitors annually once it opens in late 2027. Property acquisition is in negotiation, and a $10.6 million design funding request goes to council on April 29.

    The FIFA World Cup watch parties at Boxcar Park on June 11, 12, 18, and 19 are the shorter-term bet: a free, public fan zone in the waterfront district designed to bring people into Everett during the biggest sporting event of the summer.

    How to Track Progress on These Priorities

    Every initiative Franklin announced has a paper trail. City Council agendas and minutes are posted at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter/City-Council-10, and the council meets on Wednesdays at 6:30 p.m. except fourth and fifth Wednesdays, which meet at 12:30 p.m. Mayoral directives are archived at everettwa.gov/1789/Mayoral-Directives. Budget documents and the 2027 budget discussion will run through the Finance Department in the fall.

    The shortest answer to “what is Everett working on in 2026?” is: revenue, public safety, housing, parks, and community engagement — with the stadium and World Cup as economic accelerators. The Mayor’s framing — “Everett’s progress is best measured by how people experience our city every day” — is the test the administration has set for itself.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When was Mayor Franklin’s 2026 State of the City address?

    Mayor Cassie Franklin delivered her ninth annual State of the City address on March 5, 2026. Seattle Seahawks tackle and Archbishop Murphy alumnus Abe Lucas opened the speech.

    What are Mayor Franklin’s five priorities for 2026?

    The address outlined five priorities: pursuing long-term sustainable revenue to protect core services, strategic and community-focused public safety, housing actions including pre-approved backyard cottage plans, park upgrades at Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill, and district-by-district community engagement through town halls.

    What is Everett doing about the $14 million 2027 budget gap?

    Four levers are being evaluated: forming a regional fire authority, regionalizing library services with Sno-Isle Libraries, running another levy lid lift past voters, and continuing the annexation evaluation for Mariner. Three of the four require a public vote. The administration has not endorsed a single path.

    How many police vacancies does EPD have?

    Chief Robert Goetz said in January 2026 that the department was down to 13 or 14 vacancies and he hopes to push the number into single digits during 2026. Eight officers were promoted to supervisory roles in the two weeks before Goetz was sworn in on January 7, 2026.

    What is Mayoral Directive 2026-01?

    Signed by Mayor Franklin on February 25, 2026, the directive restricts federal immigration agents from accessing non-public areas of city buildings without a judicial warrant, requires Everett police to record interactions at the scene of immigration enforcement activity, and reaffirms compliance with Washington’s Keep Washington Working Act.

    When do the Edgewater, Garfield, and Eclipse Mill park projects open?

    The Edgewater Bridge adjacent to Edgewater Park reopens April 28, 2026. Garfield Park is in the design/public-engagement phase. Eclipse Mill Park is targeting a spring 2028 opening.

    What are the FIFA World Cup watch parties at Boxcar Park?

    Free, public fan zones hosted at Boxcar Park on the Everett waterfront on June 11, 12, 18, and 19, 2026, during the FIFA World Cup group stage and knockout matches.

    How can I attend a City Council district town hall?

    The Mayor’s Office will schedule community meetings in each City Council district throughout 2026. Details are posted to everettwa.gov and announced through the City’s news flash page at everettwa.gov/m/newsflash.