Tygart Media

Tag: Local Government

  • What PUD 3’s Gigabit Fiber Means for Mason County Business Owners in 2026

    What PUD 3’s Gigabit Fiber Means for Mason County Business Owners in 2026

    For Mason County businesses that have been running on slow or unreliable internet, the infrastructure picture is finally changing. Mason County PUD 3 is midway through a multi-year fiber buildout that is reaching rural and semi-rural commercial areas that private carriers have never touched.

    If your business depends on internet — and most do — here is what you need to know.

    What Gigabit Fiber Actually Does for a Small Business

    The headline number is 1,000 Mbps download and 1,000 Mbps upload — symmetrical gigabit. But for most small businesses, the upload speed is what matters most. Legacy DSL and cable connections are asymmetrical: you get fast downloads but slow uploads. That means uploading files to clients, backing up to the cloud, running video calls, or processing point-of-sale transactions all compete for the same limited upstream pipe.

    Fiber eliminates that bottleneck. A business that was previously struggling to host a video call while running cloud-based accounting software can now do both simultaneously — along with a dozen other tasks — without degradation.

    Which Areas Are Coming Online and When?

    PUD 3 connected Pacific Ridge (March 18), Arcadia Shores (March 25), and Fern Way (March 26) in March 2026. The Cloquallum Communities Fiberhood — serving 680+ addresses — is working through individual connections now with a full completion target of October 2026. The Three Fingers Fiber Project, funded by a federal ReConnect grant, is also in its final connection phase with an April 2026 project deadline.

    If your business is in one of these areas, fiber infrastructure is likely already built to your property. Visit pud3.servicezones.net to check your address and schedule an installation.

    The Open-Access Model: More Providers, More Competition

    PUD 3 runs an open-access network — the utility builds and maintains the fiber, but multiple competing retail internet service providers can deliver service over the same infrastructure. For businesses, this matters because it prevents the lock-in and price inflation that happens when a single ISP controls access in an area.

    You choose your provider, and providers compete for your business. That’s the opposite of the single-provider rural internet model most Mason County businesses have lived with for years.

    What This Means for Remote Work and Business Attraction

    Mason County has long faced a disadvantage in competing for skilled workers and remote-friendly employers who have historically required Puget Sound proximity because of internet infrastructure. As fiber reaches more of the county, that calculus changes.

    A home-based Mason County worker who can now reliably run video calls, access corporate systems, and upload large files at gigabit speeds doesn’t need to commute to Tacoma or Bremerton to be productive. And employers who might have passed on Mason County office space because of connectivity concerns have fewer reasons to do so.

    The economic development implications of the PUD 3 buildout extend well beyond individual households. For a deeper look at Mason County economic development, read our coverage of Olympic Mountain Ice Cream’s Port of Shelton expansion: Olympic Mountain Ice Cream Expands to Port of Shelton with $1.75M CERB Loan

    Full PUD 3 expansion details: Mason County PUD 3 Fiber Internet Is Reaching More Homes in 2026

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Can businesses get fiber internet through PUD 3 in Mason County?

    Yes. PUD 3’s fiber network serves both residential and business customers. Commercial properties in fiberhood service areas can schedule an installation and choose a retail service provider from those operating on PUD 3’s open-access network. Check your address at pud3.servicezones.net.

    What’s the difference between PUD 3 fiber and a private ISP like Comcast or CenturyLink?

    PUD 3 is a public utility that builds and maintains the fiber infrastructure, then allows multiple retail internet providers to deliver service over it. Private ISPs own their own infrastructure and control pricing and availability. In rural Mason County, private ISPs have historically underinvested — PUD 3’s public model is reaching areas that private carriers have declined to serve.

    Is PUD 3 fiber available for commercial properties or just residential?

    PUD 3’s fiber is available to any address within a completed fiberhood, including commercial properties, home-based businesses, and farms. Contact PUD 3 directly to confirm eligibility for your specific business address.

    How does PUD 3’s open-access fiber model benefit business owners specifically?

    Because multiple internet service providers compete on the same infrastructure, businesses can shop for price, contract terms, and service-level agreements rather than accepting whatever a single provider offers. This competitive dynamic tends to produce better pricing and service quality than monopoly-provider markets.


  • 17 New Jobs Coming to Shelton: What the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream Expansion Means for Mason County Workers

    17 New Jobs Coming to Shelton: What the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream Expansion Means for Mason County Workers

    When a company commits to creating 17 new permanent jobs in Mason County, that’s not a press release talking point — it’s a condition of the $1.75 million in state financing that made the expansion possible. Olympic Mountain Ice Cream’s move to the Port of Shelton comes with an obligation to grow, and that growth translates to real positions available to local workers over the next five years.

    Here’s what Mason County job seekers should know.

    The Commitment: 17 Jobs Over Five Years

    The Washington State Community Economic Revitalization Board loan that financed the Port of Shelton’s warehouse renovation is structured around job creation. The Port of Shelton received $1.75 million in low-interest CERB funding and leased the improved 11,500-square-foot facility to Olympic Mountain Ice Cream. In exchange, the company has committed to creating 17 new permanent positions over the course of five years.

    This is not speculative — it’s written into the deal structure. CERB loans are tied to employment outcomes, and projects are tracked against their commitments. For Mason County workers, the 17-job projection represents a floor, not a ceiling. A company that doubles in size often ends up hiring more than initially projected.

    What Kind of Jobs Are These?

    Olympic Mountain Ice Cream is a food manufacturing operation — artisan ice cream, gelato, and sorbet production at commercial scale. They currently employ 18 people and produce more than 50,000 gallons annually. The kinds of positions a food manufacturer of this size typically adds during a capacity expansion include:

    • Production and line workers — hands-on manufacturing roles that generally don’t require specialized credentials
    • Quality control and food safety positions — often require food handler certification, which can be obtained locally
    • Packaging, shipping, and logistics roles — as wholesale volume grows with new capacity
    • Retail and customer-facing staff — the new Port of Shelton location includes a public-facing retail storefront
    • Operations and supervisory positions — as the team scales, management layers tend to grow too

    Food manufacturing is one of the more accessible paths into stable employment for workers without four-year degrees. Many production roles offer on-the-job training, and artisan food companies — particularly family-owned operations like Olympic Mountain — often prioritize cultural fit and work ethic over specialized credentials.

    Olympic Mountain Ice Cream: A 40-Year Family Business

    The company has been operating under the same family ownership for more than 40 years, with roots in the Skokomish Valley at the base of the Olympic Mountain foothills. That tenure and stability matters for job seekers: a company that has sustained itself through multiple economic cycles and continued investing in its Mason County operations is a different kind of employer than a short-term tenant with an exit strategy.

    The move to the Port of Shelton represents a commitment to staying and growing here, not a stepping stone to relocating elsewhere in the Puget Sound market.

    How to Stay Informed About Openings

    As of April 2026, Olympic Mountain Ice Cream is in the process of completing its move to the new facility. Job postings will likely appear on the company’s website at olympicmountainicecream.com and on their Facebook page as the expansion ramps up. The Mason County Economic Development Council at masonedc.org also tracks local employment opportunities.

    WorkSource Southwest Washington (the state’s employment services office) is another resource for Mason County job seekers monitoring local manufacturing openings.

    For the full context on this expansion and what it means for Mason County: Olympic Mountain Ice Cream Opens New Port of Shelton Facility — Full Coverage

    Also relevant: SR-3 Belfair Bypass — the North Mason construction project that will create hundreds of construction jobs 2027-2029

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How many jobs will the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream expansion create in Mason County?

    The expansion is projected to create 17 new permanent jobs over five years, bringing the company’s total workforce from 18 to approximately 35 positions. The jobs are based at the new Port of Shelton facility at 130 West Corporate Drive in Shelton.

    What kind of work experience or education do you need to work at Olympic Mountain Ice Cream?

    Olympic Mountain Ice Cream is a food manufacturing company. Most production roles require a food handler permit (available through the Mason County Public Health Department) and physical stamina for production work. The company values reliability and work ethic. Retail and customer service positions for the new storefront require customer-facing experience. Supervisory and quality control roles may require relevant certifications.

    When will Olympic Mountain Ice Cream start hiring for the new Port of Shelton location?

    Hiring timelines haven’t been publicly announced as of April 2026. The facility move was targeting a March 2026 transition. Monitor the company’s website at olympicmountainicecream.com and their Facebook page for job postings as the expansion ramps up.

    Is the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream retail store open to the public?

    The new Port of Shelton facility includes a retail storefront that will be open to the public — a new feature the previous Skokomish Valley location did not prominently offer. Check their website for confirmed hours and opening information.


  • What Is CERB? How Washington State’s Economic Development Loan Program Helped Bring Olympic Mountain Ice Cream to the Port of Shelton

    What Is CERB? How Washington State’s Economic Development Loan Program Helped Bring Olympic Mountain Ice Cream to the Port of Shelton

    When the Port of Shelton Commission approved a $1.75 million loan to renovate a warehouse for Olympic Mountain Ice Cream, the financing came from a state program that most Mason County business owners have never heard of — but probably should know about.

    The Community Economic Revitalization Board, or CERB, is one of Washington State’s primary tools for funding the kind of infrastructure investment that keeps local manufacturers in rural communities instead of relocating to cheaper or better-served markets.

    What Is CERB?

    CERB is a Washington State program administered by the Department of Commerce. It provides low-interest loans and grants to public entities — port districts, counties, cities, public development authorities — for infrastructure projects tied to private sector job creation.

    The key word is “public entities.” CERB does not lend money directly to private businesses. Instead, a public partner (like the Port of Shelton) takes on the CERB debt, builds or improves an asset, and then makes that asset available to a private company under lease terms designed to be economically accessible. The private company commits to creating a specified number of jobs in exchange.

    It’s a leveraged model: $1.75 million in state money, paired with at least $1 million in private investment from Olympic Mountain Ice Cream, creates a $2.75 million project that the company likely couldn’t finance on its own — and that the private capital markets wouldn’t fund in a rural county without a public partner at the table.

    Why the Port of Shelton Was the Right Vehicle

    The Port of Shelton, established in 1948, is a public port district with statutory authority to promote economic development. Its assets include Sanderson Field, a general aviation airport and 1,200-acre industrial park, and the Johns Prairie Industrial Park. The Port can issue CERB applications on behalf of projects that meet the program’s job-creation and public benefit criteria.

    In the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream case, the mechanics are straightforward: the Port received the CERB loan, renovated its warehouse building at 130 West Corporate Drive to meet the company’s production and retail requirements, and executed a lease with Olympic Mountain Ice Cream. The lease terms are structured to be affordable for the company while generating revenue that helps the Port service the CERB debt.

    The 17-job commitment is not goodwill — it’s a contract obligation tied to the CERB financing. The state tracks job creation outcomes for CERB-funded projects, and the Port is responsible for ensuring the commitments are met.

    What This Means for Other Mason County Businesses

    The CERB program exists throughout Washington State, and Mason County has public partners — the Port of Shelton, Mason County government, Mason County Economic Development Council — that can sponsor applications for eligible projects.

    If you run a Mason County business that needs facility improvements, infrastructure investment, or expanded production capacity that would create jobs, the path to CERB financing runs through those public entities, not through a bank. The Mason County EDC at masonedc.org is the right starting point for businesses exploring whether their project could qualify.

    CERB is not the only state economic development tool available — the Washington Economic Development Finance Authority (WEDFA), the Rural Economic Development Revolving Loan Fund, and various USDA programs also operate in Mason County. But CERB is specifically well-suited to the kind of port-anchored industrial development the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream project represents.

    The Bigger Picture: Mason County’s Economic Development Momentum

    The Olympic Mountain Ice Cream expansion is happening in the same year that the SR-3 Belfair Bypass received $48.3 million in state transportation funding and PUD 3 is completing fiber buildouts reaching hundreds of additional homes. The three investments are unrelated but collectively signal a county that is attracting public capital investment at a rate that will shape its economic trajectory for years.

    For businesses considering a Mason County location or expansion, that infrastructure context — roads, fiber, industrial space at public ports — is worth paying attention to.

    Full expansion details: Olympic Mountain Ice Cream’s New Port of Shelton Facility — Complete Coverage

    Related infrastructure: PUD 3 fiber is reaching 680+ Cloquallum homes — what gigabit internet means for Mason County businesses

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What does CERB stand for and who administers it in Washington State?

    CERB stands for Community Economic Revitalization Board. It is administered by the Washington State Department of Commerce and provides low-interest financing to public entities for economic development infrastructure projects that create private-sector jobs.

    Can a private Mason County business apply for CERB funding directly?

    No. CERB loans and grants go to public entities — port districts, cities, counties, and similar government bodies — not directly to private businesses. A private business benefits from CERB through a partnership with a public entity that sponsors the project and owns the improved facility, which it then makes available to the business through a lease.

    How do I find out if my Mason County business project could qualify for CERB-backed financing?

    Contact the Mason County Economic Development Council at masonedc.org or the Port of Shelton directly. These organizations work with the Washington State Department of Commerce on CERB applications and can help determine whether your project meets the program criteria — particularly the job-creation requirements that anchor CERB eligibility.

    How much was the CERB loan for the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream project?

    The Port of Shelton received a $1.75 million CERB loan for the warehouse renovation. Olympic Mountain Ice Cream committed to at least $1 million in private investment alongside the state financing, for a total project investment of approximately $2.75 million.


  • Olympic Mountain Ice Cream Opens New Port of Shelton Facility — What a $1.75M CERB Loan and 17 New Jobs Mean for Mason County

    Olympic Mountain Ice Cream Opens New Port of Shelton Facility — What a $1.75M CERB Loan and 17 New Jobs Mean for Mason County

    One of Mason County’s most beloved food brands is growing up — and growing into a facility four times the size of where it started. Olympic Mountain Ice Cream, the artisan ice cream maker that has operated out of the Skokomish Valley for over 40 years, is establishing a new home at the Port of Shelton: an 11,500-square-foot facility at 130 West Corporate Drive, backed by a $1.75 million state loan and expected to add 17 new jobs to the local economy.

    The move is the largest single expansion in the company’s four-decade history, and one of the more significant food manufacturing investments Mason County has seen in years.

    The Numbers Behind the Expansion

    The Port of Shelton Commission passed a resolution approving the project’s financing — a $1.75 million low-interest loan from the Washington State Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB). The loan is paired with at least $1 million in private investment from Olympic Mountain Ice Cream itself, for a total project investment of roughly $2.75 million.

    The new facility is a renovated Port-owned warehouse at 130 West Corporate Drive. At 11,500 square feet, it is four times larger than Olympic Mountain Ice Cream’s previous Skokomish Valley location. The company currently employs 18 people and produces more than 50,000 gallons of artisan ice cream, gelato, and sorbet annually, serving over 300 active wholesale customers.

    The expansion plan projects 17 new permanent jobs over the next five years — nearly doubling the current workforce. In a county where manufacturing employment is relatively scarce and wages in food production tend to be accessible to workers without specialized credentials, 17 additional positions represents a meaningful contribution to the local job market.

    A New Public-Facing Retail Storefront

    The Port of Shelton facility will include a retail storefront open to the public — a significant upgrade from the company’s previous production-focused setup. For Mason County residents who know Olympic Mountain Ice Cream primarily as the brand in their grocery store freezer case, the new location offers a chance to buy direct and see the operation up close.

    The company has been handcrafting ice cream using Pacific Northwest-grown berries and stone fruit for more than 30 years under the same family ownership. Moving to a facility with a retail presence while maintaining its wholesale distribution network positions the company to grow both sides of its business simultaneously.

    What Is CERB and Why Does It Matter for Mason County?

    The Community Economic Revitalization Board is a Washington State program that provides low-interest loans and grants to public entities — including port districts — for infrastructure and economic development projects that create private sector jobs. The Port of Shelton received the $1.75 million CERB loan and is leasing the improved facility to Olympic Mountain Ice Cream.

    CERB is not a grant program for private businesses directly; it works through public partners like ports and economic development councils. The Port of Shelton model here is a good example of how it’s designed to work: the public entity takes on the CERB debt, improves an asset, and leases it to a private business, which commits to creating jobs in exchange for the favorable terms.

    For Mason County, the CERB financing keeps a homegrown company in the county that might otherwise have had to look at cheaper or more competitive real estate elsewhere in the Puget Sound region.

    The Port of Shelton’s Expanding Role

    The Port of Shelton, established in 1948, manages several distinct assets including Sanderson Field (a general aviation airport and industrial park on 1,200 acres) and the Johns Prairie Industrial Park. The Olympic Mountain Ice Cream partnership is consistent with the Port’s mission of attracting and retaining private sector employers in Mason County.

    For the Port, the project represents a low-risk deployment of CERB capital into an established local business with a proven product, an existing customer base of 300+ wholesale accounts, and a 40-year operating history in the county.

    Related: SR-3 Belfair Bypass secures $48.3M — another major Mason County investment in 2026

    Related: Mason County PUD 3 fiber expansion reaches 680+ Cloquallum homes

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Where is the new Olympic Mountain Ice Cream facility located?

    The new facility is at 130 West Corporate Drive in Shelton, at the Port of Shelton. The building is a renovated Port-owned warehouse that Olympic Mountain Ice Cream is leasing under the CERB-financed partnership arrangement.

    When will the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream retail storefront open?

    The project was moving toward a March 2026 opening based on the original timeline. Check the company’s website at olympicmountainicecream.com or their Facebook page for the most current opening status and hours.

    What is the CERB loan and who receives the money?

    The Community Economic Revitalization Board is a Washington State program that provides low-interest loans to public entities for economic development projects. The Port of Shelton received the $1.75 million CERB loan — not Olympic Mountain Ice Cream directly. The Port used the funds to renovate the warehouse building, which it leases to the ice cream company. The arrangement ties the public investment to job creation commitments.

    How many jobs is the Olympic Mountain Ice Cream expansion expected to create?

    The project is projected to create 17 new permanent jobs over five years, nearly doubling the company’s current workforce of 18. These are food manufacturing and production positions in Shelton, Mason County.

    What does Olympic Mountain Ice Cream currently produce?

    Olympic Mountain Ice Cream produces artisan ice creams, gelatos, and sorbets using Pacific Northwest-sourced ingredients including locally-grown berries and stone fruit. The company produces more than 50,000 gallons annually and serves over 300 active wholesale customers throughout the region.

    How long has Olympic Mountain Ice Cream been in business?

    Olympic Mountain Ice Cream has been operating for over 40 years under the same family ownership, with roots in the Skokomish Valley near the Olympic Mountain foothills. It is one of the oldest artisan ice cream makers in the Pacific Northwest.


    More From This Series

  • Snohomish County’s $340M Fight: How Local Leaders Are Responding to the NAVSTA Frigate Loss

    Snohomish County’s $340M Fight: How Local Leaders Are Responding to the NAVSTA Frigate Loss

    Q: How is Snohomish County responding to the Naval Station Everett frigate cancellation?
    A: Snohomish County rebooted its Military Affairs Committee in early 2026 through the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County. The committee — which includes County Council member Nate Nehring and is supported by U.S. Representative Rick Larsen — is working proactively to advocate for new ship assignments and missions to replace the 12 Constellation-class frigates that were cancelled in November 2025.

    Snohomish County’s $340M Fight: How Local Leaders Are Responding to the NAVSTA Frigate Loss

    When Secretary of the Navy John Phelan announced the cancellation of the Constellation-class frigate program on November 25, 2025, the policy language was bureaucratic. The local impact was not. Snohomish County lost a promised economic commitment worth, by some estimates, hundreds of millions of dollars in long-term growth — and local leaders wasted little time organizing a response.

    Here’s how the county’s civic and political infrastructure is responding, what tools they have, and what it would actually take to replace what was lost.

    The Economic Alliance Takes the Lead

    The Economic Alliance of Snohomish County moved quickly to reboot the Snohomish County Military Affairs Committee, a public-private advocacy body that had previously gone somewhat dormant as the frigate program appeared to be on track. With the frigates gone, the committee’s mission became urgent.

    Ray Stephanson, the Economic Alliance’s president and CEO, framed the stakes plainly: “The assignment of the frigates would have cemented the base’s role as a key asset for the U.S. Navy. Their demise is very disappointing.” Stephanson’s organization has taken the lead on coordinating the county’s advocacy strategy, engaging with Navy Region Northwest leadership, the Washington State Congressional delegation, and economic development officials at both the county and state levels.

    Snohomish County Council member Nate Nehring (R-Arlington) has accepted an invitation to join the rebooted committee, adding an elected county voice to the advocacy effort and signaling that the response to the cancellation has bipartisan support at the local level.

    Congressional Advocacy: What Larsen Can Do

    U.S. Representative Rick Larsen, whose 2nd Congressional District includes NAVSTA Everett, has been a consistent advocate for the base throughout the frigate program’s troubled history. His office has communicated directly with Navy leadership about maintaining and growing Everett’s force assignments post-cancellation.

    Larsen’s position on the House Armed Services Committee gives him meaningful access to the Pentagon’s force structure planning process — not the ability to dictate ship assignments, but the ability to ask pointed questions, advocate for specific decisions, and ensure that NAVSTA Everett’s capabilities and strategic value are being considered when the Navy decides where to send future assets.

    The committee’s work — combined with Senator Patty Murray’s and Senator Maria Cantwell’s advocacy in the Senate — gives Washington State a reasonably strong congressional presence in the ongoing conversation about what comes next for the Pacific Fleet’s surface combatant homeporting strategy.

    The $340 Million Stakes

    The Navy’s own regional estimates put the total annual economic impact of military operations in Snohomish County at approximately $340 million. That number — which reflects the current base population of approximately 6,000 military personnel and 500 civilian employees — is the baseline that local leaders are working to protect and expand.

    The 12 frigates would have added to that baseline significantly. Each frigate crew typically numbers 130-150 sailors; multiply that by 12 ships, add family members, support contractors, and the housing and retail spending that military families generate, and the economic addition would have been substantial. The Military Affairs Committee’s immediate goal is to prevent erosion of the current $340 million baseline while pursuing opportunities to grow it through new assignments.

    What Replacing the Frigates Would Actually Require

    The Navy’s Pacific Fleet posture is undergoing significant reconfiguration in response to China’s maritime expansion and the strategic priorities outlined in successive National Defense Authorization Acts. That reconfiguration creates both risks and opportunities for NAVSTA Everett.

    The risks: the same force structure analysis that killed the Constellation program could lead the Navy to consolidate homeporting at fewer, larger bases with deeper industrial support infrastructure. NAVSTA Everett’s relative distance from the major Puget Sound shipyards in Bremerton is a factor in those calculations.

    The opportunities: the Navy is actively evaluating alternatives to the frigate program, including potential upgrades to existing destroyer assignments and next-generation surface combatant concepts. NAVSTA Everett’s deep-water piers, its proximity to Paine Field’s aerospace ecosystem, and its political support make it a credible candidate for expanded assignments if the county’s advocacy is sustained and well-coordinated.

    The Military Affairs Committee’s strategy — engaging proactively rather than reactively, building relationships before decisions are made rather than lobbying after — is the right approach. The outcome will depend on factors largely outside Snohomish County’s control, but the advocacy infrastructure is now in place.

    Frequently Asked Questions: Civic Dimensions of the NAVSTA Situation

    Q: What authority does the Snohomish County Military Affairs Committee actually have?
    A: The committee is an advisory and advocacy body, not a decision-making authority. Its influence comes from organizing community and economic arguments, engaging with the congressional delegation, and maintaining relationships with Navy Region Northwest leadership. It has no formal authority over ship assignments.

    Q: What does the City of Everett’s budget look like if NAVSTA Everett shrinks?
    A: The base itself is federal property and does not generate property tax revenue directly. The city’s economic interest in the base comes from the spending of military personnel and their families in Everett’s retail, housing, and service economy. Any reduction in base population would reduce that spending, but the connection is indirect.

    Q: Is there a BRAC (Base Realignment and Closure) process that could threaten NAVSTA Everett?
    A: BRAC rounds require Congressional authorization; Congress has not authorized a new BRAC round as of spring 2026. No current legislation or Pentagon communication suggests NAVSTA Everett is a BRAC candidate. Local advocates monitor this issue continuously.

    Q: How does Snohomish County’s advocacy compare to what other military communities do?
    A: The rebooted Military Affairs Committee model is consistent with best practices for military community advocacy — most communities with major installations maintain active civilian committees that coordinate between local government, economic development organizations, and the congressional delegation. NAVSTA Everett’s advocacy infrastructure had gone dormant and is now being rebuilt.

    Q: What new ships or missions could realistically come to NAVSTA Everett?
    A: The Navy is evaluating its Pacific Fleet homeporting needs as it retires older cruisers and potentially accelerates DDG-51 destroyer production. NAVSTA Everett has the pier capacity to accommodate additional destroyers, and its location is well-suited to Pacific-oriented deployments. Specific ship assignments remain a Navy decision, subject to active advocacy.

    Related: Naval Station Everett’s Fight for Its Future After the Frigate Program Collapse | Everett Fights Back: Inside the Community Push to Secure NAVSTA’s Future | Sound Transit Everett Link Extension: Where the Project Stands in 2026

  • Everett’s Utility Tax Proposal Explained: What the 12% Rate Means for 670,000 Snohomish County Customers

    Everett’s Utility Tax Proposal Explained: What the 12% Rate Means for 670,000 Snohomish County Customers

    Q: Is Everett raising water bills in 2026?
    A: Everett is proposing to double its utility tax on water and sewer services from 6% to 12%, which would add approximately $10.74 per month to the average customer’s bill. The tax would affect roughly 670,000 people — about three-quarters of all Snohomish County residents — and is scheduled for three council readings beginning in April 2026, with a proposed July 1, 2026 effective date.

    Everett’s Utility Tax Proposal Explained: What the 12% Rate Means for 670,000 Snohomish County Customers

    Most utility tax proposals affect a city’s residents. Everett’s proposed doubling of its utility tax rate is different: because Everett’s water system serves roughly 670,000 people — approximately three-quarters of Snohomish County’s total population — the financial impact of this decision will land far beyond Everett’s city limits.

    Here is a plain-language breakdown of what is being proposed, why, what it will cost, and what happens next.

    What the City Is Proposing

    Since 1983 — more than four decades — Everett has charged a 6% “payment in lieu of taxes” (PILT) fee on its water and sewer utilities. The proposed change would eliminate that structure and replace it with a 12% utility tax, doubling the rate.

    Under state law, municipalities are explicitly permitted to levy utility taxes on their own utilities. Everett’s legal department determined that moving from the informal PILT structure to a formal utility tax aligns the city’s approach with both state law and the practice of most other Washington cities.

    The practical difference for customers is $10.74 per month on the average water bill. City Finance Director Mike Bailey described the mechanics to the Everett Herald in March: “Our tax will be embedded in wholesale water costs, and then other cities can do what they will with their utility taxes.” That embedding matters — it means communities that purchase wholesale water from Everett will see the tax added to what they pay, and those communities may then choose to layer their own local utility taxes on top.

    Why Everett Needs the Revenue

    The proposed tax is a direct response to a structural budget problem that Mayor Cassie Franklin addressed publicly during her March 2026 State of the City address: “We cannot cut our way to a sustainable future.” Everett faces a projected $14 million budget deficit heading into 2027 — a gap driven by the mismatch between rising demand for city services and relatively flat traditional revenue sources.

    The utility tax approach would generate approximately $7.5 million per year for Everett’s general fund, closing roughly half the deficit. The remaining ~$6.5 million gap has not yet been addressed by a specific, publicly announced proposal.

    Options the city has evaluated to address the full gap include regionalizing library or fire services with neighboring jurisdictions, and pursuing a targeted property tax levy lid lift — which would require voter approval. The utility tax is more politically straightforward because it does not require a public vote and can be implemented quickly if the council approves it.

    The Timeline: Three Readings, Then a Vote

    The council is expected to take three readings on the ordinance beginning in April 2026. Washington state law requires multiple readings for major ordinances, with the final vote typically occurring after the third reading. If approved, the tax would take effect July 1, 2026.

    There is no referendum process available to challenge a utility tax — once the council approves it, the rate change goes into effect on the stated date. Residents who oppose the increase can engage through public comment at council meetings prior to the final vote.

    Who Pays and How Much

    The $10.74 monthly figure applies to the average Everett direct water customer. The calculation is straightforward: if your current bill reflects a 6% fee embedded in the rate structure, the shift to 12% roughly doubles that embedded cost.

    The impact on customers of cities that purchase wholesale water from Everett is less predictable. Those communities receive the embedded tax in what they pay Everett; their own retail rates and utility taxes will determine what their residents ultimately see on bills. Snohomish County utilities from Lynnwood to Monroe, Marysville to Sultan rely on Everett’s wholesale water system, and all will be affected by the embedded rate change.

    Over 180,000 sewer customers in the Everett service area will also see the impact of the increased tax on their sewer charges.

    Low-Income Protections

    City officials have indicated they plan to expand utility payment assistance programs for income-qualified customers before the tax takes effect on July 1. As of publication, no specific details about the expanded assistance program have been released publicly — the timeline and eligibility thresholds are still being developed. Customers who currently receive utility assistance should monitor city announcements for updates on whether their assistance levels will be adjusted to account for the higher rate.

    The Broader Context: Snohomish County’s Budget Pressures

    Everett is not alone in navigating budget pressure. The state’s property tax levy limits, combined with inflation-driven cost increases in public safety, infrastructure maintenance, and human services, have created structural deficits in municipalities across Washington. The utility tax approach — available to cities under state statute, not subject to voter approval, and implementable quickly — is a tool that other Washington cities have used in similar situations.

    The scale of Everett’s water system — 670,000 customers, roughly three-quarters of the county — makes this particular decision unusual in its regional reach. Most city utility tax decisions are a local matter. This one is effectively a county-scale financial decision made by a single city’s seven-member council.

    Frequently Asked Questions About the Everett Utility Tax Proposal

    Q: When will the Everett utility tax take effect?
    A: The proposed effective date is July 1, 2026, if the City Council approves the ordinance after its three required readings beginning in April 2026.

    Q: Does this require voter approval?
    A: No. Utility taxes in Washington state do not require a public vote. The City Council can approve the rate change through the standard ordinance process.

    Q: Why does the Everett utility tax affect people outside Everett?
    A: Everett’s water system serves approximately 670,000 people across Snohomish County — about three-quarters of the county’s total population. Communities that purchase wholesale water from Everett will see the increased tax embedded in their wholesale costs, which will flow through to retail customers.

    Q: How much will my water bill go up?
    A: The average Everett direct water customer would see a monthly increase of approximately $10.74. Customers of other utilities that purchase wholesale water from Everett may see different amounts depending on their local rate structures.

    Q: What is the City of Everett’s budget deficit and why does it exist?
    A: Everett faces a projected $14 million budget deficit heading into the 2027 budget cycle. The deficit reflects a structural gap between rising service costs (public safety, infrastructure) and relatively flat traditional revenue sources, including property tax revenues constrained by Washington state levy limits.

    Q: Will there be help for low-income customers?
    A: City officials have stated their intention to expand utility payment assistance programs for income-qualified customers before July 1, 2026. Specific eligibility details and assistance amounts have not been publicly announced as of April 2026.

    Q: What else is the city considering to close the budget gap?
    A: Options under evaluation include regionalizing library or fire services with neighboring jurisdictions, and a targeted property tax levy lid lift (which would require voter approval). The utility tax, if approved, would close approximately half the $14 million projected deficit.

    Related: Everett City Council Approves Fair Labor Ordinance 9-1: What It Means for City Contractors | Sound Transit Everett Link Extension: Where the Project Stands in 2026 | Everett’s New Police Chief Has a Plan — Here’s What’s Changing at EPD

  • What Mason County Parents Need to Know About the North Mason School District Levy: April 28 Ballot

    What Mason County Parents Need to Know About the North Mason School District Levy: April 28 Ballot

    For Mason County Parents: The North Mason School District replacement levy on the April 28 ballot determines whether athletics, arts, music, counseling, and after-school programs survive for the 2026–2027 school year. This is the district’s third attempt after failures in February and November 2025.

    The April 28 Levy Vote: What It Means for Your Child’s School Year

    If your child attends school in the North Mason School District, the April 28 special election matters directly to their upcoming school year. The replacement levy on the ballot funds the programs that go beyond what the state pays for — and after two levy failures, several of those programs have already been cut back.

    Which Programs Are on the Line

    The North Mason School District replacement levy would authorize up to $5,577,446 per year through 2029 to fund programs Washington’s basic education formula doesn’t cover:

    • Athletics: Middle school and high school sports programs
    • Arts and music: Elective programs across grade levels
    • Counseling services: School counselors providing academic and social support
    • Security staff: Campus safety personnel
    • After-school programs: Enrichment and extended day activities
    • Facilities: Community gymnasium roof replacement

    What Has Already Been Cut

    The February 2025 levy failure triggered approximately $4.5 million in budget cuts at the district. North Mason families have already seen reductions in athletics, arts, counseling staff, and after-school programming. A third failure in April 2026 would force further cuts for the 2026–2027 school year — district leadership has stated these would be more severe than the 2025 reductions.

    This Is the Third Vote on This Levy

    The North Mason School District has brought this replacement levy to voters in February 2025, November 2025, and now April 28, 2026. The levy is not a new tax — it replaces an expiring measure that previously funded these same programs. Each prior failure has led to cuts that students are currently experiencing.

    How to Cast Your Vote

    Your ballot was mailed April 7. Drop it at any official Mason County drop box (open 24/7 — find locations at masoncountywa.gov) or mail it postmarked by April 28. Track your ballot at VoteWA.gov.

    Last day to register: April 20. Questions? Contact the Mason County Auditor at 360-427-9670 ext. 468.

    For full ballot and election details, see our main coverage: North Mason School District Levy: Full Voter Guide. For Mason County civic news, see Mason County Government Update.

    Related: Full Mason County April 28 Election Voter Guide

    Frequently Asked Questions: North Mason Levy and Mason County School Programs

    What school programs does the North Mason levy fund?

    The levy funds middle and high school athletics, arts and music programs, counseling services, security staff, after-school programs, and facilities like the community gymnasium roof — programs the state’s basic education formula does not cover.

    What happened to North Mason school programs after the levy failed?

    The February 2025 failure led to approximately $4.5 million in budget cuts across the district, reducing athletics, arts, counseling, and support staffing. A third failure would trigger deeper cuts for the 2026–2027 school year.

    How much does the levy cost per household?

    The estimated rate is $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed property value. On a $300,000 assessed home, that is approximately $384 per year, or roughly $32 per month.

    When do April 28 election results come out?

    Results are released after 8 PM on April 28, 2026, after ballot processing begins for the evening.

    Who can vote on the North Mason School District levy?

    Registered voters within the North Mason School District boundaries — which span parts of both Mason County and Kitsap County — received ballots for this measure.


  • Mason County Property Owners: What the North Mason School District Levy Means for Your Tax Bill

    Mason County Property Owners: What the North Mason School District Levy Means for Your Tax Bill

    For Mason County Property Owners: The North Mason School District replacement levy on the April 28, 2026 ballot would collect an estimated $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed property value annually through 2029. This is a replacement levy, not a new tax. Total annual collection: up to $5,577,446 across the district.

    The North Mason Levy and Your Property Tax: What the April 28 Vote Means

    For Mason County property owners, the April 28 special election brings a concrete question: what does the North Mason School District replacement levy mean for your tax bill, and what has already changed in the district since the levy funding lapsed after the February 2025 failure?

    The Numbers: What You Would Pay

    The replacement levy would authorize up to $5,577,446 per year collected from property owners within the district from 2026 through 2029. The estimated collection rate is $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed property value.

    Estimated annual cost at common Mason County assessed values:

    • $200,000: approximately $256/year ($21/month)
    • $300,000: approximately $384/year ($32/month)
    • $400,000: approximately $512/year ($43/month)
    • $500,000: approximately $640/year ($53/month)

    This is a replacement levy — it renews an expiring measure, not a new tax layer. Property owners who were paying under the previous levy would see their rate continue at roughly the same level.

    School Quality and Property Values

    After the February 2025 levy failure and the resulting $4.5 million in cuts, the North Mason School District reduced athletics, arts, music, counseling, and after-school programs. A third consecutive failure in April 2026 would force further reductions for the 2026–2027 school year.

    School district quality is consistently among the top factors prospective homebuyers evaluate when assessing a community. The relationship between school funding and residential property values is well-documented in Washington state real estate markets.

    This Is the Third Attempt

    The levy failed in February 2025 and November 2025. April 28, 2026 is the third vote on this replacement measure. The district has operated under reduced funding since the first failure, absorbing cuts to programs that levy revenue previously supported. A third failure would deepen those cuts further.

    How to Vote

    Ballots were mailed April 7 and processing began April 13. Drop your ballot at any official Mason County drop box (locations at masoncountywa.gov) or mail it postmarked by April 28. Track your ballot at VoteWA.gov. Last day to register: April 20.

    For the full voter guide, see Mason County April 28 Special Election Coverage. For Mason County economic news, see Mason County Business Update.

    Related: Full Mason County April 28 Election Voter Guide

    Frequently Asked Questions: North Mason Levy and Property Taxes

    What is the North Mason School District levy rate in 2026?

    The estimated rate is $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed property value. The levy would collect up to $5,577,446 per year from 2026 through 2029 from properties within the district boundaries.

    Is this a new tax or a replacement?

    This is a replacement levy — it renews an expiring measure rather than creating a new obligation. Property owners within the North Mason School District were already paying under the previous levy at a comparable rate.

    Does the levy apply if my property is in Kitsap County but within the school district?

    Yes. The North Mason School District covers portions of both Mason County and Kitsap County. Property owners within the district boundaries in either county are subject to the levy if it passes.

    What happens to school programs if the levy fails again?

    A third failure would force the district to implement additional cuts beyond the $4.5 million already absorbed after February 2025, affecting athletics, arts, counseling, security staffing, and after-school programming for the 2026–2027 school year.

    Where can I find Mason County drop box locations?

    Official drop box locations are listed at masoncountywa.gov. Boxes are open 24/7. You can also mail your ballot postmarked by April 28 or register and vote in person at the Mason County Auditor’s office on Election Day.


  • Third Time at the Ballot: Why North Mason’s School Levy Has Failed Twice and What a Third Failure Would Mean

    Third Time at the Ballot: Why North Mason’s School Levy Has Failed Twice and What a Third Failure Would Mean

    Civic Context: The North Mason School District replacement levy on the April 28, 2026 ballot has failed twice in 14 months — in February and November 2025. Each failure deepened cuts. The April vote is the district’s third attempt to restore this funding stream.

    North Mason’s Levy Has Failed Twice. April 28 Is the Third Attempt.

    For Mason County civic watchers, the April 28 special election is more than a routine levy vote — it’s the third chapter in a policy story that has reshaped the North Mason School District over the past 14 months.

    The replacement levy failed in February 2025. It failed again in November 2025. The district cut approximately $4.5 million following the first failure. Now, heading into a third election, the question is whether Mason County voters are prepared to restore the funding stream — and what a third failure would mean for public education in the North Mason region.

    How Washington’s Levy System Works

    Washington state’s school funding model pays for a defined “basic education” baseline. Programs and services outside that definition — athletics, arts, music, counseling, security staff, after-school programs, certain facility needs — must be funded locally through voter-approved levies.

    Replacement levies renew expiring authorization; they are not new taxes. When voters decline to renew, the district cannot substitute other funds. The programs either operate at reduced capacity or are eliminated.

    A Chronology of the North Mason Levy Battle

    • February 2025: First vote — levy fails. District responds with $4.5 million in cuts across athletics, arts, counseling, security, and after-school programs.
    • November 2025: Second vote — levy fails again. District continues operating under reduced budget heading into the 2025–2026 school year.
    • April 28, 2026: Third attempt. The levy would authorize up to $5,577,446 annually at $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed value through 2029. District leadership has stated that a third failure would require additional cuts beyond the current level for the 2026–2027 school year.

    What Makes This Pattern Unusual

    School levy failures of this duration are uncommon in Washington state. Most districts that bring replacement levies to voters see them pass on the first or second attempt. North Mason’s situation reflects a pattern of voter resistance that has emerged in several rural and semi-rural Washington communities since 2024, where skepticism about school spending levels has grown alongside property tax increases from other sources.

    The North Mason School District serves communities in both Mason County and portions of Kitsap County, meaning the vote outcome is shaped by two different county electorates.

    What Civic Watchers Should Watch For

    April 28 results will be released after 8 PM. Initial returns typically reflect mail-in ballots received before Election Day. If the levy fails a third time, watch for district budget discussions in the weeks following — the 2026–2027 school year budget process will need to begin with the assumption of no levy funding.

    Track results at masoncountywa.gov and via the Mason County Auditor at 360-427-9670 ext. 468.

    Full voter guide: Mason County April 28 Special Election Coverage. For broader Mason County government news, see SR-3 Belfair Bypass Funding and Commissioner Meetings.

    Related: Full Mason County April 28 Election Voter Guide

    Frequently Asked Questions: North Mason Levy History and April 28

    How many times has the North Mason levy failed?

    Twice — in February 2025 and November 2025. The April 28, 2026 vote is the third attempt. Each prior failure has led to budget cuts and program reductions across the district.

    What did the first levy failure cost the district?

    The February 2025 failure triggered approximately $4.5 million in budget cuts and staff reductions, affecting athletics, arts, music, counseling services, security staffing, and after-school programs.

    Why can’t the district use other funding to replace the levy?

    Washington state school funding has categorical restrictions. Levy revenue covers programs outside the state’s basic education formula — the district cannot legally redirect state education funds to replace voter levy revenue.

    What would a third levy failure mean for the 2026–2027 school year?

    District leadership has stated that a third failure would require additional cuts beyond the current $4.5 million level — likely more severe reductions affecting programs for the upcoming school year.

    Does the district serve only Mason County voters?

    No. The North Mason School District covers portions of both Mason County and Kitsap County. The April 28 levy vote involves registered voters within district boundaries in both counties.

    Where do official Mason County election results get posted?

    The Mason County Auditor releases results after 8 PM on Election Day at masoncountywa.gov. The Auditor’s office is at 360-427-9670 ext. 468.


  • North Mason School District Levy: What Mason County Voters Need to Know Before April 28

    North Mason School District Levy: What Mason County Voters Need to Know Before April 28

    April 28 Special Election: Mason County voters are deciding the fate of the North Mason School District replacement levy — the district’s third attempt after failures in February and November 2025. Ballots were mailed April 7. Return yours by April 28 or drop at any official Mason County drop box.

    North Mason School District Levy Is on the April 28 Ballot — For the Third Time

    Mason County voters have another chance to decide the future of their local public schools. The North Mason School District replacement levy is on the April 28, 2026 Special Election ballot — and for many residents, the stakes feel higher than ever.

    The levy failed in February 2025. It failed again in November 2025. A third consecutive failure would leave the district without any levy funding for the 2026–2027 school year and likely trigger cuts deeper than the $4.5 million the district already absorbed after the first failure.

    If you haven’t returned your ballot yet, here’s everything you need to know before April 28.

    What the Levy Does

    The North Mason School District replacement levy is a four-year renewal measure that would authorize the collection of up to $5,577,446 annually from 2026 through 2029. The estimated property tax rate is $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed value in 2026.

    This is not new money — it’s a replacement for an expiring levy. The funds cover programs and services the state’s basic education formula does not pay for, including middle and high school athletics, arts and music programs, elective course offerings, counseling services, security staff, after-school programs, and community gymnasium roof replacement.

    What Two Levy Failures Have Already Cost

    The February 2025 levy failure triggered approximately $4.5 million in budget cuts and staff reductions across the North Mason School District. Those cuts affected every program category funded by the levy — reduced athletics, scaled-back arts, fewer support staff in counseling and security roles.

    A third failure in April 2026 would mean the district goes without levy funding entirely for the upcoming school year. District leadership has indicated further reductions would be necessary — likely more severe than the previous round.

    Who Is Affected

    The North Mason School District serves communities in both Mason County and portions of Kitsap County. Registered voters within the district boundaries in both counties received ballots for this measure.

    How to Return Your Ballot

    Ballots were mailed to all registered voters on April 7, and ballot processing began April 13. Results will be available after 8 PM on Election Day, April 28.

    To return your ballot: drop it at any official Mason County drop box (open 24/7 — locations at masoncountywa.gov), or mail it postmarked by April 28. Track your ballot status at VoteWA.gov under “Your Ballot and Voting Materials.”

    For ballot questions, contact the Mason County Auditor at 360-427-9670 ext. 468 during business hours or 360-968-4131 after hours.

    Key dates: April 20 is the last day to register by mail or online. Same-day in-person registration is available at the Mason County Auditor’s office on Election Day.

    Related Mason County Civic Coverage

    For recent Mason County government decisions, see our coverage of the SR-3 Belfair Bypass $48.3M funding and Mason County Government Update.

    Related: Mason County Forest Festival 2026 — June 5–7 in Shelton

    Frequently Asked Questions: Mason County April 28, 2026 Special Election

    What is on the Mason County April 28, 2026 ballot?

    The primary measure is the North Mason School District replacement levy, which would authorize up to $5,577,446 annually from 2026 through 2029 to fund programs not covered by the state’s basic education formula — including athletics, arts, music, counseling, security staff, and after-school programs.

    How many times has the North Mason levy been on the ballot?

    The April 28, 2026 vote is the third attempt. The levy failed in February 2025 and again in November 2025. Each failure has resulted in budget cuts and program reductions at North Mason schools.

    What programs were cut after the first levy failure?

    The February 2025 levy failure led to approximately $4.5 million in district cuts, affecting athletics, arts, music, counseling services, security staffing, and after-school programs across the district.

    What is the North Mason levy tax rate?

    The estimated rate is $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed property value in 2026. On a $300,000 assessed home, that is approximately $384 per year.

    How do I return my Mason County ballot?

    Drop your ballot at any official Mason County drop box (locations at masoncountywa.gov) or mail it postmarked by April 28. Track your ballot status at VoteWA.gov.

    When are April 28 election results released?

    Initial results will be available after 8 PM on April 28, 2026, once the Mason County Auditor begins processing returned ballots.

    What is the last day to register to vote for the April 28 election?

    April 20, 2026 is the last day to register by mail or online. Same-day voter registration is available in person at the Mason County Auditor’s office on Election Day.