Tygart Media

Tag: Local Government

  • Mason County April 28 Special Election: What’s on the Ballot and How to Return Your Ballot

    Mason County April 28 Special Election: What’s on the Ballot and How to Return Your Ballot

    April 28 Special Election: Mason County ballots were mailed April 7. Ballot processing begins April 13. Results will be available after 8 PM on April 28. The North Mason School District replacement levy is among the measures on the ballot.

    Mason County’s April 28 Special Election Is Underway — Here’s What You Need to Know

    If you’re a registered voter in Mason County, your April 28 Special Election ballot should already be in your hands. Ballots were mailed out on April 7, and Mason County began processing them today, April 13.

    Results will be available after 8 PM on Election Day, April 28. The Mason County Auditor’s office is handling all ballot questions — you can reach them at 360-427-9670 ext. 468 during business hours, or 360-968-4131 after hours.

    North Mason School District Replacement Levy

    The most consequential item for many Mason County residents is the North Mason School District’s replacement levy — the district’s third attempt to pass the measure after failures in February and November 2025.

    The levy would renew an expiring four-year measure, collecting up to $5,577,446 annually from 2026 through 2029 to fund programs and operations not covered by state basic education funding. That includes athletics, arts, music, counseling, security staff, and classroom support. The estimated rate is $1.28 per $1,000 of assessed property value in 2026.

    Prior levy failures have already resulted in roughly $4.5 million in district budget cuts and staff reductions. A third failure would likely trigger further reductions for the 2026–2027 school year.

    Key Dates

    • April 7 — Ballots mailed to registered voters
    • April 13 — Ballot processing begins
    • April 20 — Last day to register to vote by mail or online
    • April 28 — Election Day; vote centers open until 8 PM; results after 8 PM

    How to Return Your Ballot

    Ballots must be received or postmarked by April 28. You can drop your ballot at any official Mason County drop box — locations are listed at masoncountywa.gov. To track your ballot status, visit VoteWA.gov and select “Your Ballot and Voting Materials.”

    Questions? Contact the Mason County Auditor at 360-427-9670 ext. 468 during business hours.

    Frequently Asked Questions: Mason County April 2026 Election

    When is the Mason County Special Election?

    April 28, 2026. Results will be available after 8 PM. Ballot processing began April 13.

    What is on the Mason County April 28 ballot?

    The North Mason School District replacement levy is among the measures on the ballot. Check your specific ballot for all items in your district.

    How do I return my Mason County ballot?

    Drop it at any official Mason County drop box or mail it postmarked by April 28. Track your ballot at VoteWA.gov.

    What is the last day to register to vote in the April 28 election?

    April 20, 2026, by mail or online. Same-day registration is available in person at the Mason County Auditor’s office on Election Day.


    Related: North Mason Levy Voter Guide: Full Analysis

  • Everett City Council Approves Fair Labor Ordinance 9-1: What It Means for City Contractors

    Everett City Council Approves Fair Labor Ordinance 9-1: What It Means for City Contractors

    The Everett City Council voted 9-1 on March 25, 2026 to approve a new fair labor standards ordinance that requires contractors doing business with the city to maintain detailed payroll records, properly classify workers, and allow employees to report violations directly to city officials.

    The ordinance gives Everett expanded enforcement tools against contractors who commit wage theft or misclassify employees — and applies the protections not just to union workers, but to all workers on city contracts.

    What the Ordinance Requires

    Under the new law, contractors seeking city business must meet a set of labor standards as a condition of their contract. According to Ward 2 Councilor Stephanie Martins, who championed the measure, those requirements include:

    • Maintaining industrial coverage insurance
    • Properly classifying employees rather than misclassifying them as independent contractors
    • Keeping daily sign-in and sign-out logs for workers on the job
    • Complying with federal healthcare reform law
    • Submitting monthly certified payroll records to the city

    Employees working under city contracts will be able to report violations through a city-managed reporting system. If a contractor is found to be out of compliance, the city gains the authority to revoke or suspend the contract, or attach additional conditions to it.

    Why It Matters Beyond Union Workers

    One of the central arguments Councilor Martins made during debate was that the ordinance fills a protection gap that union contracts don’t address. Union members typically have collective bargaining agreements that cover labor standards. Non-union workers on city-funded projects have had less formal protection.

    “A developer in the wrong will find it cheaper to pay employees than fighting the city,” Martins argued during council deliberations.

    The ordinance was also framed as a tool to combat trafficking and immigration-related exploitation of workers on city job sites — not just traditional wage theft.

    The One Dissenting Vote

    Ward 1 Councilor Michele Capone cast the lone no vote, expressing concern that Everett’s city government lacks the administrative capacity to meaningfully enforce the ordinance’s requirements.

    “I don’t think the City of Everett can even enforce all of the different issues within this ordinance suggestion,” Capone said, also raising questions about potential legal challenges to the measure.

    Supporters of the ordinance pushed back on the enforcement concern. Councilor Rogers explained during debate that enforcement does not have to fall entirely on city staff — the ordinance creates a mechanism to “elevate a violation to the state,” meaning complaints can be referred to state labor agencies with broader investigative authority. “We would have the ability to elevate a violation to the state,” Rogers said, noting this gives the city meaningful enforcement reach without requiring a large new city bureaucracy.

    Who’s Affected

    The ordinance applies to contractors who enter into agreements with the City of Everett. It does not apply retroactively to existing contracts. Businesses that rely on city contracts — from construction firms to service providers — will need to ensure their record-keeping and employment practices meet the new requirements before seeking future city work.

    What Happens Next

    The ordinance passed with a veto-proof 9-1 margin and is now city law. Contractors working on upcoming city projects should review the requirements and consult with their legal counsel about compliance timelines.

    Residents who believe a contractor working on a city project is violating the ordinance can report concerns through the city’s official channels at everettwa.gov.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What did Everett’s new fair labor ordinance do?
    The ordinance requires contractors doing business with the city to maintain proper payroll records, correctly classify workers, and provide employees with a way to report violations. The city can now revoke or suspend contracts for noncompliance.

    When did the ordinance pass?
    The Everett City Council passed the ordinance on March 25, 2026, by a 9-1 margin.

    Who voted against it?
    Ward 1 Councilor Michele Capone cast the sole dissenting vote, citing concerns about the city’s ability to enforce the ordinance.

    Does this apply to union workers?
    Union workers on city contracts are already covered by their collective bargaining agreements. The ordinance primarily extends protections to non-union workers, though it applies to all contractors working under city agreements.

    Can employees report violations?
    Yes. The ordinance creates a formal reporting mechanism so employees can flag violations to the city. The city can then act on those reports or refer them to state labor enforcement agencies.

    Does this apply to all businesses in Everett?
    No. The ordinance applies to contractors seeking or holding contracts with the City of Everett — not to all private employers operating within city limits.

    What can the city do if a contractor violates the ordinance?
    The city can revoke a contract, suspend it, or impose additional conditions. It can also refer violations to state labor agencies for investigation.

  • Everett’s Proposed Utility Tax Would Add $10.74 a Month to Most Snohomish County Water Bills

    Everett’s Proposed Utility Tax Would Add $10.74 a Month to Most Snohomish County Water Bills

    Everett residents and Snohomish County water customers could see their monthly bills increase by nearly $11 starting July 1, 2026, if the Everett City Council approves a proposal to double the city’s utility tax rate on water and sewer services.

    The proposal, which the council is expected to consider through three readings beginning in April, would replace the existing 6 percent “payment in lieu of taxes” (PILT) fee with a 12 percent utility tax on water and sewer. That change would raise approximately $7.5 million per year for the city’s general fund — closing about half of a projected $14 million budget deficit the city faces heading into 2027.

    What It Means for Your Water Bill

    For the average Everett water customer, the tax increase would add roughly $10.74 per month in additional charges. The city’s current 6 percent fee has been in place since 1983 — more than four decades without adjustment. City officials argue the updated structure better aligns with state law that explicitly allows municipalities to levy utility taxes.

    “Our tax will be embedded in wholesale water costs, and then other cities can do what they will with their utility taxes,” City Finance Director Mike Bailey told the Everett Herald in March.

    The change affects more than just city residents. Everett’s water system serves approximately 670,000 people — roughly three-quarters of all businesses and residents across Snohomish County. Communities that purchase wholesale water from Everett will see the tax embedded in what they pay Everett, and those cities may then choose to layer their own utility taxes on top of that wholesale rate.

    Over 180,000 sewer customers would also be affected.

    Why Everett Faces a $14 Million Gap

    The budget shortfall is not a sudden emergency — city officials have been working to address a structural revenue gap that grows as demand for services increases while traditional revenue sources remain flat. Mayor Cassie Franklin addressed the issue directly during her March 2026 State of the City address, telling residents: “We cannot cut our way to a sustainable future.”

    Options the city has evaluated to close the gap include regionalizing library or fire services and pursuing a targeted property tax levy lid lift. The utility tax approach has gained traction because it does not require voter approval, can be implemented relatively quickly, and taps into a revenue source the city’s legal department says is clearly permitted under Washington state law.

    The new tax would close approximately half the projected $14 million deficit. City officials have not yet publicly committed to a specific plan for closing the remaining gap.

    Low-Income Customer Protections

    City officials have indicated they plan to expand utility payment assistance programs for income-qualified customers before the tax takes effect. No details about the expanded program have been released publicly as of publication.

    What Happens Next

    The Everett City Council is expected to hold its first reading on the utility tax ordinance in April 2026. Under standard council procedure, an ordinance requires three readings before it can be voted on for final approval. If the council approves the measure on its current timeline, the 12 percent rate would take effect July 1, 2026.

    No council vote has occurred yet. Residents who wish to weigh in can attend council meetings held at 6:30 p.m. Wednesdays at the Everett City Council Chambers, 3002 Wetmore Ave., or submit comments through the city’s official website at everettwa.gov.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the current utility tax rate in Everett?
    The city currently charges a 6 percent fee described as a “payment in lieu of taxes” on water and sewer services. This rate has been in place since 1983.

    How much more will I pay each month?
    The city estimates the average customer will pay approximately $10.74 more per month if the 12 percent rate is approved.

    Do I have to be an Everett resident to be affected?
    No. Everett’s water system serves approximately 670,000 people across Snohomish County — roughly three-quarters of the county’s residents and businesses. If your community buys water from Everett, you may see the increase reflected in your bill.

    Does this require voter approval?
    No. A utility tax does not require a public vote. The Everett City Council has authority to approve it through the standard ordinance process.

    When would the new rate take effect?
    The proposed effective date is July 1, 2026, pending council approval.

    Will there be assistance for low-income customers?
    City officials have stated they plan to expand utility payment assistance programs before implementation, but details have not been finalized.

    How much money will this raise?
    The city projects the 12 percent utility tax would raise approximately $7.5 million annually toward the general fund.

    Why does Everett have a budget deficit?
    The city faces a projected $14 million budget shortfall in its 2027 general fund. Mayor Franklin has said the city cannot solve the gap through cuts alone and is pursuing new revenue strategies.

    Go Deeper: We’ve published detailed knowledge nodes expanding on this story for specific Everett audiences:

  • Everett Is Changing How It Talks to Neighborhoods — Here’s What That Means for You

    Everett Is Changing How It Talks to Neighborhoods — Here’s What That Means for You

    Quick Answer: Everett launched a new format for neighborhood engagement in February 2026, replacing individual association visits from city officials with annual districtwide meetings that bring all neighborhood groups in a council district together at once. The first meeting drew about 60 residents to the Cascade Boys and Girls Club in District 2, with Mayor Cassie Franklin, Police Chief Robert Goetz, and Council Member Paula Rhyne attending.

    Everett Is Changing How It Talks to Neighborhoods — Here’s What That Means for You

    Something shifted in how Everett connects with its residents this past February, and if you’re involved in any of the city’s neighborhood associations — or you’ve been meaning to get involved — it’s worth understanding what changed and why it matters.

    For years, city officials made the rounds by visiting individual neighborhood associations, showing up at separate meetings across all 19 groups scattered through Everett’s five council districts. It was well-intentioned, but it meant the same officials repeating the same updates dozens of times while different neighborhood groups often didn’t know what was happening two blocks away. The city piloted a new approach this year, and if it takes hold, it could genuinely change how engaged Everett residents feel in their own neighborhoods.

    What the New Format Looks Like

    On February 24, 2026, the city held its first districtwide neighborhood meeting at the Cascade Boys and Girls Club in District 2. Instead of sending officials out to individual neighborhood associations one at a time, the new model convenes all neighborhood groups within a single council district together in one room, once a year.

    About 60 residents turned out for that first meeting — not a massive crowd, but a meaningful one for a pilot format. Attending alongside neighbors from across District 2 were Mayor Cassie Franklin, District 2 City Council Member Paula Rhyne, and Police Chief Robert Goetz.

    The idea is simple: equitable engagement. Every neighborhood in a district hears the same information at the same time, from the same officials. Nobody gets the mayor’s visit and nobody gets left with just a staffer. The individual neighborhood associations still hold their regular meetings independently — this annual districtwide gathering is an addition, not a replacement.

    What They Actually Talked About

    The February meeting covered a lot of ground — these weren’t soft, feel-good topics. Officials addressed immigration enforcement response, housing policy, youth safety, traffic safety, economic development, and the city’s drones-as-first-responders program.

    Council Member Rhyne went into specifics about a significant challenge ahead: Everett is facing an anticipated $14 million general fund shortfall heading into 2027. Rhyne outlined potential paths to close that gap, including regionalizing library and fire services or implementing a targeted property tax levy increase for parks or public safety.

    Mayor Franklin added that if additional funding does materialize, the city intends to maintain and expand services — extending library hours was one specific example she mentioned.

    These are real conversations about real tradeoffs, held in a room with the people most affected by them. That’s exactly the kind of civic engagement Everett neighborhoods have asked for.

    Why This Change Matters for Neighborhood Life

    Everett has 19 active neighborhood associations spanning five council districts. They range in size and energy — some run robust programs, others are smaller groups that meet a few times a year. The challenge has always been making sure every neighborhood feels like it has a real channel to city leadership, not just the ones with the loudest voices or the most organized association leadership.

    The districtwide format addresses that in a couple of ways. First, it puts neighbors from different associations in the same room, which tends to surface shared concerns that individual groups might not realize are city-wide. Second, it makes city officials directly accountable to a broader cross-section of residents at once, rather than managing separate narratives with each group.

    Council Member Rhyne also mentioned preliminary work toward annexing southern Everett areas — a process that, if it happens, would likely span several years. That’s exactly the kind of long-horizon planning news that neighbors need to hear early, not after decisions are already made.

    What About Your Neighborhood Association?

    Your neighborhood association isn’t going anywhere. This new districtwide meeting is meant to complement, not replace, the regular work of neighborhood groups. If anything, it gives associations a better reason to stay active and connected — because now there’s an annual districtwide event where their voices contribute to a larger district-level conversation.

    Everett’s 19 neighborhood associations are:

    Bayside, Boulevard Bluffs, Cascade View, Delta, Evergreen, Glacier View, Harborview-Seahurst-Glenhaven, Holly, Lowell, Northwest, Pinehurst-Beverly Park, Port Gardner, Riverside, Silver Lake, South Forest Park, Twin Creeks, Valley View-Sylvan Crest-Larimer Ridge, View Ridge-Madison, and Westmont.

    If you’re not sure which association covers your block, the City’s Office of Neighborhoods keeps an updated map and contact list. You can reach them at (425) 257-7112 or nwebber@everettwa.gov, or visit everettwa.gov/neighborhoods.

    The Bigger Vision: One Everett

    Mayor Franklin has been using the phrase “One Everett” to describe her administration’s approach to the city. The districtwide neighborhood meeting format fits squarely into that framing — the idea that city leadership should be equally accessible across all neighborhoods, not just the ones that are easiest to reach or most organized.

    Whether this pilot format becomes permanent depends on how well it works. If turnout grows and the conversations it generates prove more productive than the old model, it seems likely to continue and expand. If you care about how your neighborhood connects to city government, showing up to the next one in your district is the most direct way to have a say in whether this experiment succeeds.

    How to Stay Informed

    Watch for announcements about upcoming districtwide meetings at everettwa.gov and through your neighborhood association. The city also offers email and text notifications for neighborhood-specific updates — you can subscribe on the city’s website. Your neighborhood association is often the fastest way to hear about these events, which is one more reason to stay connected to yours.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Everett’s new districtwide neighborhood meeting format?

    Instead of individual visits to each neighborhood association, city officials now host one annual meeting per council district that brings all neighborhood groups in that district together at once. The first pilot meeting was held February 24, 2026 in District 2.

    Does this replace regular neighborhood association meetings?

    No. Neighborhood associations continue to hold their regular independent meetings. The districtwide meeting is an annual addition to the existing system, not a replacement.

    How many neighborhood associations does Everett have?

    Everett has 19 active neighborhood associations spread across five council districts.

    How do I find my Everett neighborhood association?

    Contact the City’s Office of Neighborhoods at (425) 257-7112, email nwebber@everettwa.gov, or visit everettwa.gov/neighborhoods. There’s also an interactive map on the city website to find your council district.

    What topics were covered at the first districtwide meeting?

    The February 2026 District 2 meeting covered immigration enforcement response, housing policy, youth safety, traffic safety, economic development, the city’s budget situation, and the drones-as-first-responders program.

    Who attended the first districtwide neighborhood meeting?

    Mayor Cassie Franklin, Police Chief Robert Goetz, and District 2 Council Member Paula Rhyne attended, along with approximately 60 residents from neighborhood associations across District 2.

  • Everett’s $120M Stadium Has a $38M Funding Gap: Here’s the Full Breakdown

    Everett’s $120M Stadium Has a $38M Funding Gap: Here’s the Full Breakdown

    Where does Everett’s stadium stand right now? As of spring 2026, Everett’s proposed downtown Outdoor Event Center has grown from an $82 million project to a $120 million project — leaving a $38 million funding gap that must be closed before the city council can give final approval. Here’s a plain-language breakdown of where the money comes from, where it doesn’t, and what happens next.

    We’ve been tracking Everett’s proposed downtown stadium since the first conceptual drawings surfaced, and lately the news has gotten more complicated. The price tag climbed from $82 million to $120 million. A $38 million funding gap opened up. City council approval is still pending. And yet Mayor Cassie Franklin is calling it a “once in a generation opportunity” and promising the gap will close.

    So what’s actually going on? Let’s walk through it — all the numbers, all the players, and the honest question of whether this stadium gets built by 2027.

    The Project, Explained

    The Everett Outdoor Event Center — commonly called the downtown stadium — is planned for a downtown block bounded by Hewitt and Pacific Avenues, east of Broadway. The project is designed to be a multi-use venue: it would host Everett AquaSox minor league baseball games, two United Soccer League teams (still in lease negotiations as of spring 2026), and year-round events including concerts and community gatherings.

    The design-build team is DLR Group and Bayley Construction — both well-established in Pacific Northwest stadium and arena work. Design reached 60 percent completion earlier in 2026, and city officials say a full plan and budget will be ready “very soon.”

    The city’s target: get the AquaSox playing there for the April 2027 baseball season. That’s less than 12 months away.

    Where Did the $120 Million Figure Come From?

    The project originally carried an $82 million price tag. That number grew to $120 million for two reasons, according to city special projects manager Scott Pattison:

    • More property acquisitions needed. The city needs to acquire more parcels on the proposed site than originally anticipated. At least 17 businesses currently occupy the proposed footprint, and property acquisition costs have risen.
    • Construction cost inflation. Like virtually every major construction project in the Pacific Northwest since 2022, the stadium’s hard construction costs have increased significantly.

    The $120 million is the current estimate. City officials acknowledge the design isn’t fully complete, which means the final number could still move before council votes.

    Where Is the Money Coming From?

    Here’s the funding stack as it currently stands, based on the city’s own presentation documents:

    • City of Everett bonds: ~$40 million — This is the city’s primary funding vehicle. The bonds would be repaid through stadium revenue: ticket sales, event fees, naming rights, and other stadium income. The city had already planned this piece before the cost increase.
    • State of Washington: ~8% of total (~$9.6M) — The state has committed to contributing, though the exact mechanism and timeline haven’t been finalized.
    • Snohomish County: ~4% (~$4.8M) — The county is in for a contribution as well.
    • Everett AquaSox ownership: ~9% (~$10.8M) — The team’s ownership group is contributing as a condition of occupying the stadium.
    • United Soccer League: ~9% (~$10.8M) — The USL is expected to contribute similarly, pending final lease agreements.

    Add that up: roughly $76 million committed or expected. Against a $120 million budget, that leaves the $38 million gap.

    How Does Everett Plan to Close the Gap?

    This is the central question. City officials and the mayor are pointing to two strategies:

    1. Private Investment

    The city is actively seeking private investors — local and regional business leaders and investors who would put capital into the project. Mayor Franklin’s State of the City address in March 2026 emphasized that Everett needs “new pathways to long-term, sustainable revenue” and positioned the stadium as a catalyst for that investment. City council members have pointed to similar projects on the West Coast where private dollars closed comparable gaps.

    2. Additional Municipal Bonds

    If private investment doesn’t cover the full gap, the city may issue supplemental bonds. This is the less popular option — it puts more city debt on the table — but officials say they’re confident the stadium’s revenue stream can support additional bond service.

    The Everett Chamber of Commerce has publicly supported the project, and the Herald’s editorial board has urged the city to keep pushing on funding. But there’s also real community skepticism: the Snohomish County Tribune has published critical op-eds questioning whether taxpayers should shoulder more of the cost.

    What Has to Happen Before Council Votes?

    Before city council can give final approval to build the stadium, three things need to happen:

    • The $38 million gap must be closed — or at least have a credible, council-approved funding plan.
    • Property purchases must be finalized — Two parcels are under contract as of spring 2026, but none have closed. The city can’t finalize designs without knowing what land it controls.
    • Lease agreements must be signed — The AquaSox and USL lease negotiations are ongoing. The city expects these to wrap within weeks, but “weeks” has been said before.

    Council then needs to vote to approve the project. That vote is the formal green light for construction to begin — and construction needs to start almost immediately if the April 2027 deadline is going to hold.

    What Happens if the Timeline Slips?

    The AquaSox are currently playing at Funko Field. If the new stadium isn’t ready for April 2027, they stay at Funko Field. The USL timeline also slides. The economic activity the city is projecting — “tens of millions of dollars” annually, per Mayor Franklin — gets pushed out by at least a year, probably more.

    For context: the original cost estimate was $82 million. It’s now $120 million. The original target was to open before 2027. We’ll see if that timeline holds.

    Our Take

    We want this stadium built. A multi-use venue in downtown Everett — baseball, soccer, concerts, community events year-round — is exactly the kind of infrastructure that accelerates the momentum we’re seeing at the waterfront and in the downtown core. The location makes sense. The design makes sense. The teams make sense.

    But the funding math needs to close, and close publicly, before this becomes a real project instead of a very expensive set of architectural renderings. The city owes residents a clear, accountable answer to: who is putting in the $38 million, and what happens if they don’t? We’ll be watching every council session until we get it.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How much does the Everett downtown stadium cost?

    As of spring 2026, the estimated cost for the Everett Outdoor Event Center is $120 million, up from an original estimate of approximately $82 million. The increase reflects additional property acquisition needs and construction cost inflation.

    Where is the Everett stadium going to be built?

    The stadium is planned for a downtown Everett block between Hewitt and Pacific Avenues, east of Broadway. At least 17 businesses currently occupy the proposed site and will need to relocate.

    Who is funding the Everett downtown stadium?

    Funding comes from a mix of sources: approximately $40 million in city bonds (repaid by stadium revenue), contributions from the state of Washington, Snohomish County, the Everett AquaSox ownership, and the United Soccer League. A $38 million gap remains to be filled by private investors or additional bonds.

    When will the Everett stadium open?

    The city is targeting an opening for the April 2027 Everett AquaSox baseball season. City council has not yet given final approval to build. Construction would need to begin in 2026 to hit a 2027 opening.

    Who will play in the Everett downtown stadium?

    The stadium is designed for the Everett AquaSox (minor league baseball), two United Soccer League teams, and year-round events including concerts and community events. USL lease negotiations were still ongoing as of spring 2026.

    Who is designing the Everett stadium?

    DLR Group is the architect and Bayley Construction is the design-build contractor for the Everett Outdoor Event Center. Design was approximately 60 percent complete as of early 2026.

    Has Everett city council approved the stadium?

    No. As of spring 2026, city council has not given final approval to build the stadium. Final approval requires closing the funding gap, completing property acquisitions, and finalizing lease agreements with the sports teams.

  • Everett’s Downtown Stadium Price Tag Climbs to $120M: What the $38M Gap Means for the AquaSox and USL Project

    Everett’s Downtown Stadium Price Tag Climbs to $120M: What the $38M Gap Means for the AquaSox and USL Project

    Q: What is the current cost estimate for the Everett downtown stadium?
    A: As of early 2026, the Everett Outdoor Event Center is estimated to cost $120 million — up $38 million from the previous estimate — with construction now targeted for 2027 and games beginning in 2028.

    Everett’s Downtown Stadium Price Tag Climbs to $120M: What the $38M Gap Means for the AquaSox and USL Project

    We have been following the Everett Outdoor Event Center closely since the city first committed to the concept, and the latest numbers deserve an honest look. Documents shared with city council members in January 2026 and reported publicly in February revealed that the stadium’s estimated cost has grown to $120 million — about $38 million more than the estimate from last May. That is not a rounding error. It is a real funding challenge that the city, the AquaSox, and prospective soccer tenants now have to solve before a shovel goes in the ground.

    Here is where things stand as of April 2026, and what we think matters most about the path forward.

    How Did the Cost Jump by $38 Million?

    The short answer: construction costs have gone up across the board, and the stadium project is not immune. The city’s original financial model anticipated a cost significantly below $120 million, with a planned $40 million in revenue bonds — paid off by the stadium’s own revenue stream — providing the bulk of the funding. State contributions, Snohomish County dollars, and commitments from both the Everett AquaSox and the prospective United Soccer League (USL) teams were also part of the mix.

    That plan still exists. But the new $38 million gap has to be closed before the city council can formally approve the project. City staff are clear about the sequencing: find the funding, finalize the lease agreements with the teams, negotiate the property purchase at the site, and then bring it to council for approval. The council cannot move forward until those three conditions are met.

    The Site and What Gets Built There

    The planned location is downtown Everett, with most of the block between the site boundaries — except the buildings fronting Hewitt Avenue — slated for demolition to clear the footprint. Twenty-eight privately owned parcels make up most of that block, and property acquisition is part of the pre-construction work the city needs to complete.

    The design-build team is DLR Group and Bayley Construction, selected through the city’s Progressive Design-Build (PDB) process. As of early 2026, the design is at roughly 60 percent completion. The full plan and budget — the version that actually goes to council — is expected to be ready soon, with the city’s stated goal of having the stadium ready for baseball by April 2027. Following the funding news, city staff placed the revised construction start in 2027, pushing the opening to 2028 for both baseball and soccer.

    Mayor Franklin’s Take: Momentum and a Funding Plan Coming

    Mayor Cassie Franklin addressed the stadium directly at her March 5, 2026 State of the City address inside the New Everett Theater on Colby Avenue. The speech leaned into the city’s broader momentum — crime reduction, housing growth, annexation plans — with the stadium cited as a symbol of downtown revitalization. On the funding gap, the mayor signaled that a formal funding plan is coming to council soon, with an emphasis on private-public partnership dollars as the preferred first approach.

    The city is working first with private investors — regional businesses and corporations — plus public agencies to find as much non-city funding as possible. If that falls short, additional city bonds are on the table to fill whatever gap remains. The editorial board of the Everett Herald has weighed in supporting the effort to fund the project, and the Everett Chamber of Commerce has issued formal support. There is also community pushback: a piece in the Snohomish County Tribune argued that taxpayer funding for a minor league stadium is not the right use of public dollars. That debate is real, and the council will have to navigate it.

    The AquaSox and USL Dimension

    The stadium is designed to serve both the Everett AquaSox (Minor League Baseball, an affiliate of the Seattle Mariners) and potentially both a men’s and women’s United Soccer League team. The AquaSox currently play at Funko Field at Everett Memorial Stadium, which was built in the 1960s and has aged considerably. A new downtown facility would represent a major upgrade for the franchise and for fans.

    The USL angle is compelling from an economic standpoint: dual-sport use expands the number of event days the facility can generate revenue, which directly improves the financial model underlying the revenue bonds. More event days means stronger debt service coverage, which means the bonds are a safer bet. That is why both sports tenants matter to the funding math, not just the fan experience.

    What We Are Watching

    There are several decision points ahead that will determine whether this stadium actually gets built on the current timeline:

    The council presentation: City staff have committed to presenting a formal funding plan to council soon. That presentation will include how the $38 million gap is proposed to be closed — and whether private investment dollars materialize, or whether additional city bonds are needed.

    Property acquisition: The city needs to negotiate the purchase of 28 privately owned parcels. That process involves appraisals, negotiations, and potentially condemnation proceedings if sellers do not agree on price. Timeline uncertainty here is real.

    Lease agreements: The AquaSox and USL tenants need signed lease agreements before the project can move to council. Those negotiations are ongoing.

    Design completion: The 60 percent design milestone needs to reach 100 percent, with a budget that the city and its design-build team can both commit to. Any further cost escalation at this stage could reopen the funding math again.

    Is This Stadium Still Happening?

    We think the honest answer is: probably yes, but on a compressed timeline with real funding risk. The political will exists — the mayor is behind it, the chamber is behind it, the council has already approved $4.8 million in stadium spending to get to this point. The question is whether the private investment dollars materialize quickly enough to keep the 2027-2028 construction and opening timeline intact.

    If the private funding effort comes up short and the city has to go to additional bonds, that will face a political test with the council and with the public. Everett voters and taxpayers are paying attention. The Herald editorial support helps, but so does the Tribune’s skepticism — it represents a real constituency.

    What we know for certain: the stadium as designed, at $120 million, would be a transformative piece of downtown Everett’s physical fabric. Whether the city can close the gap and break ground in 2027 is the story we will be tracking all year.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How much does the Everett downtown stadium cost?

    The latest estimate as of early 2026 is $120 million — approximately $38 million more than the estimate from May 2025.

    When will the Everett stadium be built?

    City staff have placed construction in 2027, with baseball and soccer games targeted to begin in 2028. The previous goal of opening for April 2027 baseball has been pushed back.

    Who is the design-build team for the Everett stadium?

    DLR Group and Bayley Construction were selected through the city’s Progressive Design-Build process.

    What teams will play in the new Everett stadium?

    The Everett AquaSox (Minor League Baseball, Seattle Mariners affiliate) and potentially both men’s and women’s United Soccer League teams.

    Where will the Everett stadium be built?

    In downtown Everett. Most of a city block — 28 privately owned parcels — will be demolished, except for buildings fronting Hewitt Avenue.

    How will the $38 million funding gap be filled?

    The city plans to seek private investment first (regional businesses and corporations), then public agency contributions. If those fall short, additional city revenue bonds are on the table. A formal funding plan presentation to the city council is forthcoming.

    See also: Everett’s $120M Stadium Gap: What Needs to Happen Before Ground Breaks | What the Stadium Means for Downtown Business Owners | Visitor’s Guide to Everett’s Planned Stadium

  • Government & Civic: SR-3 Belfair Bypass Gets $48.3M, Commissioner Meetings & Transit Board Update — Mason County Minute

    Government & Civic: SR-3 Belfair Bypass Gets $48.3M, Commissioner Meetings & Transit Board Update — Mason County Minute

    Big news for North Mason: State legislators Drew MacEwen, Dan Griffey, and Travis Couture have secured $48.3 million in the 2026 supplemental transportation budget for the SR-3 Freight Corridor project — the long-awaited Belfair Bypass. The 6-mile new highway will route through-traffic around downtown Belfair, with construction currently scheduled for 2027–2029. Environmental review is complete and land acquisition is well underway. This is the single largest infrastructure investment in North Mason in a generation.

    On the local government calendar, the Mason County Board of Commissioners met Monday, April 6 with the Clean Water District on the agenda. Briefings are held at the Courthouse in Shelton (411 N. 5th St.) and are also available via Zoom — a good habit to check in on if you want to know what’s happening with county water quality initiatives.

    Shelton City Council holds its regular business meeting Tuesday, April 7 at 6 p.m. at the Civic Center (525 W. Cota St.). And looking ahead, Mason Transit Authority holds its April board meeting on Tuesday, April 21 at 1 p.m. — this month at the Hoodsport Regional Library (40 N. Schoolhouse Rd., Hoodsport). The public is welcome to attend all of these.

    Civic Calendar & Key Updates

    • SR-3 Freight Corridor / Belfair Bypass: $48.3M secured in 2026 WA supplemental transportation budget. 6-mile new alignment routing around downtown Belfair. Construction: 2027–2029. Environmental review complete, land acquisition underway.
    • Mason County Commissioners: Regular briefings at 411 N. 5th St., Shelton + Zoom. Clean Water District updates ongoing. Check masoncountywa.gov for agendas.
    • Shelton City Council: Regular business meetings at 525 W. Cota St., 6 PM. Check ci.shelton.wa.us for full agenda.
    • Mason Transit Authority Board: April 21 at 1 PM, Hoodsport Regional Library, 40 N. Schoolhouse Rd., Hoodsport. Public welcome.

    Sources: WSDOT SR-3 Freight Corridor project page, WA State Fiscal LEAP Transportation Document 2026-2, Mason County Journal, MasonWebTV.com, Shelton City Council agenda, MasonTransit.org

  • Mason County Government Update: Belfair Bypass Funding Secured & Local Meeting Schedule — April 6, 2026

    Mason County Government Update: Belfair Bypass Funding Secured & Local Meeting Schedule — April 6, 2026

    Your Mason County commissioners are meeting this morning — Monday, April 6 — with the Clean Water District on the agenda. Briefings begin at 9 a.m. at the Courthouse in Shelton (411 N. 5th St.) and are also available via Zoom. Then tomorrow, Tuesday April 7, Shelton City Council holds its regular business meeting at 6 p.m. at the Civic Center (525 W. Cota St.). 🏛️

    Big news for North Mason: State legislators Drew MacEwen, Dan Griffey, and Travis Couture have secured $48.3 million in the 2026 supplemental transportation budget for the SR-3 Freight Corridor project — the long-awaited Belfair Bypass. The 6-mile new highway will route through-traffic around downtown Belfair, with construction currently scheduled for 2027–2029. Environmental review is complete and land acquisition is well underway.

    Also coming up: Mason Transit Authority holds its April board meeting on Tuesday, April 21 at 1 p.m. — this month at the Hoodsport Regional Library (40 N. Schoolhouse Rd., Hoodsport). The public is welcome to attend.

    Sources: MasonWebTV.com | Mason County Commissioners Agendas | WSDOT SR-3 Project Page | Mason Transit Board Meetings

  • Belfair Business Beat: Sweetwater Creek Park Ribbon Cutting April 10 & Industrial Growth on SR-3 — Belfair Bugle

    Belfair Business Beat: Sweetwater Creek Park Ribbon Cutting April 10 & Industrial Growth on SR-3 — Belfair Bugle

    Something new is opening in Belfair this week — and it’s been a long time coming.

    The Sweetwater Creek Waterwheel Park will hold its official ribbon-cutting celebration on Thursday, April 10 at 1 p.m., hosted by the North Mason Chamber of Commerce. The park sits just off Highway 3, right next to Belfair Elementary School and across from the Theler Wetlands — a spot many of you drive past every day.

    This isn’t your average park. The Sweetwater Creek project, developed through a partnership between the Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group (PNW Salmon Center) and the Port of Allyn, features the only freshwater ADA-accessible fishing access in Mason County, along with new bridges, trails, a nature playground built from natural materials like boulders and logs, native plant installations, and even solar panels and a small hydropower system. It’s free and open to the public.

    After years of planning, grant compliance work, and community effort, the park officially opened to the public on March 31 — and now it’s time to celebrate. Mark your calendars for April 10 and come say hi to your neighbors. North Mason does community right.

    What’s Opening & What’s Coming

    • Sweetwater Creek Waterwheel Park: Open since March 31. Ribbon cutting April 10 at 1 PM. Free, ADA accessible. Only freshwater ADA fishing access in Mason County.
    • Puget Sound West Industrial (25400 SR-3): Class A industrial development at the Mason/Kitsap county line, up to 1.4 million SF planned. Phase I underway. Sewer capacity expansion along Hwy 3 corridor is in progress to support growth.
    • Port of Allyn: Development partner on Sweetwater Creek and a longtime Mason County economic anchor (18560 E. SR-3, Allyn WA).

    Sources: Mason County Journal, PNW Salmon Center, Port of Allyn, North Mason Chamber of Commerce