Tag: Local Government

  • Frederickson Is Becoming Tacoma’s Manufacturing Magnet – And Global Companies Are Noticing

    There is a moment in every city’s economic life when the signals stop being coincidental. When a 130-year-old Japanese conglomerate signs a lease for 300,000 square feet in a Pierce County industrial park — and a national flooring retailer deploys the Pacific Northwest’s first hydrogen-powered warehouse fleet at the same address — you stop calling it a trend and start calling it a destination.

    That destination is Frederickson. And if you want to understand where Tacoma’s economy is heading, the industrial corridors southeast of the city tell the story better than any press release.

    Kowa’s Big Bet on Pierce County

    In August 2025, the Economic Development Board for Tacoma-Pierce County announced that Kowa Co. Ltd., a Nagoya-based global manufacturer founded in 1894, had signed a lease for more than 300,000 square feet at the FRED310 industrial park in Frederickson. Facility improvements were already underway at the time of the announcement. Production was slated to begin in 2026.

    Kowa employs more than 8,000 people worldwide and operates across a remarkably diverse portfolio: pharmaceuticals, medical devices, vision technology, textiles, machinery, construction materials, and energy products. Its North American footprint spans offices in Boston, New York, Honolulu, Morrisville (NC), Montgomery (AL), and Torrance (CA) — but Frederickson represents the company’s first manufacturing operation of this kind in the Pacific Northwest.

    The company isn’t yet ready to disclose exactly what it will manufacture here. But the scale of the commitment — 300,000-plus square feet, facility buildout, local hiring — signals a long-term operational anchor, not a satellite office or a distribution pass-through.

    “This is a major win for Pierce County,” said Pierce County Executive Ryan Mello in the EDB’s announcement. “Kowa’s expansion demonstrates that our region is well-positioned for global investment. It reflects our shared commitment — across public and private sectors — to building a strong, resilient economy that offers opportunity and innovation.”

    A Recruitment Three Years in the Making

    EDB Vice President of Business Recruitment Sarah Bonds confirmed that the organization had worked with Kowa on its site-selection process since 2023 — a two-year courtship that involved Pierce County, Tacoma Public Utilities, Puget Sound Energy, Impact Washington, the World Trade Center Tacoma, and the Washington State Department of Commerce.

    That level of regional coordination doesn’t happen by accident. It reflects a deliberate strategy by Pierce County’s economic development infrastructure to position the area as a credible alternative to Seattle for industrial and advanced manufacturing investment — one with land, utilities, workforce, and port access that Seattle simply can’t replicate at comparable cost.

    “This project showcases what’s possible when regional partners are aligned and committed,” Bonds said. “Each partner brought critical expertise to the table, and together we created a compelling case for Kowa to invest in Pierce County.”

    Washington Commerce Director Joe Nguyễn called Kowa’s decision a “significant milestone,” adding: “This expansion highlights Washington’s strengths as a manufacturing powerhouse and underscores the importance of our robust community partnerships.”

    Why Japan Keeps Looking at Tacoma

    Kowa’s arrival isn’t a one-off. It follows a pattern of Japanese investment that runs deep in Pierce County’s economic DNA.

    Japan is the top export destination for oceangoing cargo containers out of the combined ports of Tacoma and Seattle, according to 2024 data from The Northwest Seaport Alliance. Japan also ranks third in inbound container volume. That trade relationship creates a natural gravity for Japanese manufacturers — proximity to the port means lower logistics costs and faster transit to home markets.

    It also means the local business community already knows how to work with Japanese companies. The World Trade Center Tacoma maintains active relationships with Japanese trade and commerce organizations. Pierce County’s sister-city relationships with Japanese municipalities have produced business networks that proved useful in Kowa’s two-year recruitment. When a company is evaluating a major international expansion, those pre-existing relationships matter.

    The EDB recognized Kowa’s arrival as one of the region’s 10 standout economic development projects of the year at its 2026 Annual Luncheon, held at the Greater Tacoma Convention Center — one of the so-called “Excellent 10 Awards” that highlight investments shaping Pierce County’s future.

    FRED310: The Industrial Park That Keeps Delivering

    Kowa isn’t arriving in a vacuum. The FRED310 industrial campus in Frederickson has become one of the most active addresses in Washington State’s industrial real estate market — and the roster of tenants explains why global companies keep showing up.

    In 2025, Floor & Décor opened a 1.1-million-square-foot distribution center at FRED310 — one of the largest industrial facilities in the state. But the headline wasn’t just the square footage. In October 2025, Floor & Décor announced it had partnered with Plug Power to deploy a fully hydrogen-powered material handling fleet at the Frederickson facility — 77 pieces of equipment running on hydrogen fuel cells, with a 10,000-gallon liquid hydrogen storage system on-site.

    The system eliminates more than 400 metric tons of CO₂ equivalent annually at the facility — the emissions equivalent of burning roughly 45,000 gallons of gasoline — while generating approximately 300 liters of water per day for recapture. It’s the first zero-emission material handling fleet deployment in the Pacific Northwest at this scale, and it positions Frederickson as a proving ground for industrial sustainability technology.

    Floor & Décor’s Frederickson center was also recognized in the EDB’s 2026 Excellent 10 — specifically for being the company’s first distribution center to pivot to green hydrogen.

    Add NewCold’s automated frozen storage facility in the greater Tacoma area — the Netherlands-based company’s largest U.S. automated warehouse — and the picture that emerges is of a regional industrial ecosystem actively competing for and winning marquee tenants at a scale that would have seemed improbable a decade ago.

    What This Means for Tacoma’s Workforce

    The practical question for Pierce County residents is simple: what does all this investment mean for jobs?

    Kowa has confirmed it will hire for roles in operations, logistics, and administration, with hiring set to begin ahead of the 2026 production launch. Specific headcount hasn’t been disclosed, but a 300,000-square-foot manufacturing operation in this sector typically supports between 100 and 300 full-time positions depending on the product mix and automation level. The EDB confirmed the project will stimulate local supply chains and generate additional tax revenue for public services.

    Floor & Décor’s Frederickson distribution center already employs more than 80 workers and is actively growing. The facility’s hydrogen infrastructure partnership with Plug Power is expected to support additional technical and maintenance roles as the system scales.

    The broader manufacturing momentum in Frederickson also feeds the pipeline at Maritime|253, the new skills center under construction along the Thea Foss Waterway that will offer Pierce County high schoolers tracks in manufacturing, skilled trades, logistics, and maritime technology. It’s expected to open Fall 2026 — just as Kowa’s production line comes online.

    That alignment is not accidental. It reflects a regional strategy built over years: recruit advanced manufacturers, build a trained workforce pipeline, and leverage the Port’s competitive position to keep logistics costs low enough to compete with Sun Belt alternatives.

    The Honest Counter-Signal

    Not every headline out of Tacoma belongs in the win column. In May 2026, Delta Camshaft — the largest custom camshaft regrinding company in the United States, which had operated in Tacoma for nearly five decades — announced it was relocating to Arizona. Owner Jon Bodwell cited crime, taxes, and regulatory friction in Washington state as the drivers of the decision.

    Community forums and local conversations have noted the departure, with some longtime residents expressing concern that the business climate supporting small and mid-sized manufacturers is eroding even as large international deals get signed. (Community signal: this tension between big-deal wins and ground-level friction is a recurring theme in South Sound business conversations.)

    Worth holding both realities at once. The macro story — port access, shovel-ready land, coordinated recruitment, workforce development — is genuinely compelling and producing real results at the global level. But the micro story — regulatory burden, public safety concerns, cost of doing business — is also real and driving decisions by businesses that don’t have the scale to absorb friction the way a multinational can.

    EDB President and CEO Michael Catsi acknowledged this directly at the 2026 Annual Luncheon, noting that “uncertainty is hurting us” — particularly around tariff volatility — while arguing that economic uncertainty historically creates opportunity for regions prepared to move fast.

    The Bottom Line

    Frederickson is not a fluke. The combination of FRED310’s industrial infrastructure, the Port’s trade relationships with Japan and Asia-Pacific markets, competitive utility pricing, and a regional economic development apparatus willing to run a two-year recruitment campaign has produced a corridor punching above its weight.

    Kowa Co. Ltd. — 130 years old, 8,000 employees, global reach — looked at the entire West Coast and signed a lease in Frederickson. That’s the signal. The rest is follow-through.

    For Tacoma, the job now is to make sure what gets built in that 300,000-square-foot building is worth the investment — in infrastructure, in workforce training, and in the unglamorous work of keeping a business environment functional for companies at every scale, not just the ones that make the Excellent 10 list.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Kowa Co. Ltd. and why did it choose Frederickson?

    Kowa Co. Ltd. is a 130-year-old Japanese conglomerate headquartered in Nagoya, employing more than 8,000 people worldwide across pharmaceuticals, medical devices, textiles, machinery, and energy products. The company chose Frederickson’s FRED310 industrial park for its first Pacific Northwest manufacturing operation, citing the region’s skilled workforce, port access, favorable utilities partnerships with Tacoma Public Utilities and Puget Sound Energy, and a well-coordinated public-private recruitment effort led by the EDB for Tacoma-Pierce County.

    How big is Kowa’s new Frederickson facility?

    Kowa is leasing more than 300,000 square feet at the FRED310 industrial park in Frederickson. Facility improvements were already underway as of the August 2025 announcement, with production slated to begin in 2026. The company has not yet disclosed what it will manufacture at this location.

    What jobs will Kowa create in Pierce County?

    Kowa plans to fill roles in operations, logistics, administration, and more. Hiring was set to begin in late 2025, ahead of the 2026 production launch. The EDB confirmed the project will stimulate local supply chains, support infrastructure development, and generate additional tax revenue for public services.

    What other major companies have recently expanded in Frederickson?

    Floor & Décor opened a 1.1-million-square-foot distribution center at FRED310 in 2025, deploying a hydrogen-powered material handling fleet in partnership with Plug Power — eliminating more than 400 metric tons of CO₂e annually. NewCold operates its largest U.S. automated cold storage warehouse in the greater Tacoma area. Both were recognized in the EDB’s 2026 Excellent 10 Awards.

    Why is Frederickson attracting so much manufacturing investment?

    Frederickson offers shovel-ready industrial land, proximity to the Port of Tacoma, competitive utility rates, a skilled trades workforce, and a coordinated regional recruitment effort involving the EDB, Pierce County, and the Washington State Department of Commerce. The area has become one of the most active manufacturing corridors in the Pacific Northwest.

  • Tacoma International Business: 2026 Trade & Sister Cities

    Tacoma International Business: 2026 Trade & Sister Cities

    If you spend any time tracking economic development in Tacoma, you notice something that doesn’t always get enough attention: this city has been doing international business since before “global supply chains” was a buzzword. The Port of Tacoma has been a Pacific gateway since the late 1800s. The sister city program stretches back to 1959, when Tacoma first linked up with Kitakyushu, Japan. And the World Trade Center Tacoma — the only full-service WTC in the Pacific Northwest — has been quietly connecting Pierce County operators to overseas markets for decades.

    Last refreshed: October 9, 2026 (Pacific).

    What’s changed in 2026 is the pace and the intentionality. State-level trade missions, newly expanded sister city partnerships, and a foreign investment pipeline into downtown Tacoma are all converging at once. Here’s what local operators and community leaders need to know.

    The Japan Trade Mission: Tacoma Sent a Delegation to Tokyo in May 2026

    The most significant recent development on the international business front is the Washington Secretary of State’s Japan Trade Mission, which ran May 16–27, 2026. Led by Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, the 40-member delegation traveled to Tokyo to reinforce Washington’s position as one of Japan’s most important American trading partners.

    Tacoma’s fingerprints were all over this one. The World Trade Center Tacoma was among the coordinating organizations, and the Economic Development Board for Tacoma-Pierce County (EDB) participated directly. The delegation covered sectors that matter deeply to Pierce County: aerospace, sustainable aviation fuel, agriculture, and advanced manufacturing.

    The numbers behind this relationship are not small. Japan is the largest foreign investor in the United States, and the Washington State-Japan bilateral trade relationship is valued at $11.1 billion. Tacoma and Pierce County are specifically home to multiple Japanese-owned U.S. subsidiaries that have collectively invested more than $550 million in capital expenditures over the past decade, according to the South Sound Business Journal.

    These aren’t abstract statistics. They represent factories, logistics facilities, and engineering jobs that exist in Pierce County because of sustained relationship-building over years. The May 2026 mission was the continuation of that work — executives and public officials in the same room, reinforcing connections that underpin thousands of local paychecks.

    Tacoma’s 15 Sister Cities: The World’s Longest-Running Business Development Network

    People sometimes think of sister city programs as ceremonial — plaques, cultural festivals, the occasional student exchange. That undersells what Tacoma’s program actually is. The Tacoma Sister Cities network encompasses 15 relationships across four continents, and for operators with international ambitions, these connections represent real access.

    The full roster includes:

    • Asia-Pacific: Kitakyushu, Japan (1959) | Fuzhou, China (1994) | Gunsan, South Korea | Taichung, Taiwan | Davao City, Philippines
    • Europe: Aalesund, Norway | Biot, France | Hvar, Croatia | Brovary, Ukraine
    • Russia/Eurasia: Vladivostok, Russia (1992)
    • Africa/Middle East: George/Garden Route District, South Africa | El Jadida, Morocco | Kiryat Motzkin, Israel
    • Americas: Boca del Rio, Mexico | Cienfuegos, Cuba

    According to the City of Tacoma, the program focuses on cultural arts and tourism, global education, government relations, and international business development. That last bucket is the one that deserves more attention from the Pierce County business community.

    Why the Pacific Rim Relationships Are Particularly Valuable

    Of Tacoma’s 15 sister cities, the Pacific Rim relationships carry the most direct commercial weight — which makes sense given the Port’s geographic position. Kitakyushu has been a sister city for 67 years and has an industrial economy that mirrors Tacoma’s: manufacturing, logistics, environmental technology, and steel. Fuzhou is a major Chinese port city and manufacturing hub. Gunsan, South Korea has aerospace and automotive ties. Taichung is Taiwan’s second-largest city and a semiconductor and machinery manufacturing center.

    For Tacoma businesses looking at export markets, these aren’t just symbolic relationships. They’re introductory infrastructure — a channel into business communities that are otherwise difficult to access cold.

    A New Chapter with South Africa: The Garden Route Partnership

    The most recent headline in Tacoma’s sister city world comes from the other side of the Pacific Rim frame — the South African coast. In March 2026, the City of Tacoma officially elevated its 28-year relationship with George, South Africa into a broader district-wide partnership with the Garden Route District Municipality, a coastal economic zone that shares notable similarities with Pierce County: port access, maritime culture, outdoor recreation, and a growing agricultural export sector.

    That expansion was followed quickly by action. A Garden Route delegation visited Tacoma from April 23–28, 2026, according to the Garden Route District Municipality’s official release. The visit, coordinated by Tacoma Sister Cities’ Melannie Cunningham, focused on port city and maritime trade alignment, agricultural export opportunities in the ostrich industry, skills transfer and vocational education exchange, and tourism and sports diplomacy frameworks.

    This is what a mature sister city program looks like in practice — not a one-time visit but an escalating series of structured exchanges that build toward actual commerce. The Garden Route partnership expansion suggests Tacoma’s international affairs office is actively working to add economic substance to these relationships.

    The World Trade Center Tacoma: Your On-Ramp to International Markets

    If you’re a Pierce County business owner thinking “I’d like to be in the room when these delegations come through,” the World Trade Center Tacoma (WTCT) is where you start. Operating as the lone full-service WTC in the Pacific Northwest, WTCT specializes in organizing inbound and outbound trade missions, connecting local firms with international buyers and distributors, export counseling and market-entry support, and coordinating with state agencies, the Port, and the EDB on investment attraction.

    The Port of Tacoma has described WTCT as the connective tissue between the region’s trade infrastructure and the individual businesses that want to use it. For mid-sized manufacturers, ag exporters, or tech firms looking at Pacific Rim market entry, WTCT is the most direct path into that network.

    The Bigger Picture: $52 Billion in Annual Trade and a Port That Beats LA on Speed

    All of this diplomatic and organizational activity sits on top of a genuinely exceptional piece of trade infrastructure. Pierce County’s position in the Pacific Rim economy isn’t aspirational — it’s structural. Tacoma trades nearly $36 billion in goods with Japan and China alone. Total international trade value through the Northwest Seaport Alliance approaches $75 billion annually, supporting 48,000+ jobs and $4.3 billion in regional revenue. The Port’s location gives shippers access to Pacific Rim markets several days faster than LA or San Diego. And the Port’s Foreign Trade Zone #86 allows businesses to delay or eliminate U.S. Customs duties on imported inputs.

    According to Make It Tacoma, Chinese foreign direct investment alone has contributed more than $300 million toward downtown Tacoma development, including a 22-story four-star hotel and mixed-use projects near the Convention Center.

    This is the context in which those trade missions and sister city exchanges happen. They’re not feel-good diplomacy layered on top of a standard mid-size American city. They’re relationship maintenance for a regional economy that is genuinely, structurally embedded in the Pacific Rim trade system.

    What This Means for Pierce County Operators in 2026

    The immediate takeaways for local business owners and economic development stakeholders: The Japan relationship is active and being tended. If you’re in aerospace supply chain, agriculture, manufacturing, or logistics and haven’t engaged with the EDB or WTCT about Japan market access, the May 2026 trade mission is a reminder that state-level infrastructure is in place to support that work.

    The South Africa expansion is a signal worth watching. The Garden Route partnership is broader than a single-city tie — it’s a district-to-city framework that could open agricultural and maritime commerce channels that didn’t exist before. Operators in food production, port services, and vocational education have specific angles here.

    And the sister city network is real infrastructure, not ceremony. With 15 relationships active and the City’s international affairs office clearly engaged, Tacoma has warm introductory access into business communities across Japan, China, Korea, Taiwan, the Philippines, and beyond. That access has to be activated by individual businesses — but the on-ramp exists.

    Tacoma has been a Pacific Rim city since the railroads arrived. The difference in 2026 is that the diplomatic, organizational, and trade infrastructure is more sophisticated than it’s ever been — and more of it is accessible to operators who know to look.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How many sister cities does Tacoma have?

    Tacoma has 15 official sister cities spanning four continents, including Kitakyushu (Japan), Fuzhou (China), Gunsan (South Korea), Taichung (Taiwan), Davao City (Philippines), Vladivostok (Russia), Aalesund (Norway), Biot (France), Hvar (Croatia), Brovary (Ukraine), El Jadida (Morocco), George (South Africa), Boca del Rio (Mexico), Cienfuegos (Cuba), and Kiryat Motzkin (Israel).

    What is the World Trade Center Tacoma and what does it do?

    The World Trade Center Tacoma (WTCT) is the only full-service World Trade Center in the Pacific Northwest. It facilitates inbound and outbound trade missions, connects Pierce County businesses with international partners, and coordinates with state agencies to support export growth and foreign direct investment in the region.

    What was the 2026 Washington State Japan Trade Mission?

    Led by Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, the May 2026 Japan Trade Mission sent a 40-member delegation to Tokyo from May 16–27. The delegation included World Trade Center Tacoma, the EDB for Tacoma-Pierce County, state legislators, and industry leaders in aerospace, agriculture, and creative industries. Japan is Washington’s largest foreign investment partner, with bilateral trade valued at $11.1 billion.

    How much trade flows through the Port of Tacoma with Pacific Rim countries?

    Tacoma trades nearly $36 billion in goods with Japan and China alone, with total international trade volume across the Northwest Seaport Alliance approaching $75 billion annually. The Port of Tacoma’s location gives shippers access to Pacific Rim markets several days faster than West Coast ports like Los Angeles and San Diego.

    What is Tacoma’s newest international partnership in 2026?

    In March 2026, Tacoma elevated its 28-year sister city relationship with George, South Africa to a broader district-wide partnership with the Garden Route District Municipality. An exchange delegation visited Tacoma April 23–28, 2026, focusing on port city trade, maritime culture, skills transfer, ostrich industry exports, and academic exchange programs.

  • Snohomish County Charter Review: November 2026 Ballot Guide

    Snohomish County Charter Review: November 2026 Ballot Guide

    Quick answer: Five Snohomish County charter amendments are on the November 3, 2026 general-election ballot. The Charter Review Commission finalized them on May 29; the County Council unanimously sent them to the auditor on June 3 (HeraldNet). The county lists them as Propositions 1–5 on its Charter Review Commission page and the November 3 sample ballot.

    Charter review happens once every ten years. The 15-member elected commission spent the first half of 2026 winnowing roughly two dozen ideas down to five amendments. Those five are no longer “proposals before a May hearing” — they are ballot propositions. This guide replaces older coverage written before the May 29 commission vote, including pieces that still used the commission’s working numbers (Proposal 5, 13, 14, 21, 22).

    How the five propositions map

    Ballot proposition What it does (plain language) Old commission working number
    Prop. 1 — Foundational Government Services Policy Requires the county legislature and executive to prioritize and protect funding for foundational government services (public safety, courts, elections, and named elected offices, among others). Proposal 13
    Prop. 2 — Prioritize Funding of Budget Stabilization Funds Requires the county to maintain two stabilization funds (a primary fiscal-stability fund and a secondary catastrophic/emergency fund), with supermajority rules to tap them. Proposal 14
    Prop. 3 — All Elected County Offices Nonpartisan Removes party labels from county elected offices. Today only the County Council, County Executive, and Prosecuting Attorney still carry party preference on the ballot; Prop. 3 would make all county elected offices nonpartisan. Proposal 5
    Prop. 4 — County Financial Transparency Requires the county to make legally available financial information publicly accessible (budget, procurement, compensation and related data), including through a searchable tool where practicable. Proposal 22
    Prop. 5 — 4/5 Supermajority to Raise Councilmanic Taxes Requires a four-fifths County Council vote to assess, levy, or increase any tax the council can raise without a public vote. Applies to councilmanic tax increases occurring after January 1, 2027. Proposal 21

    Exact ballot titles and explanatory text are on the auditor’s sample ballot. When wording conflicts, the sample ballot and county election materials control — not this explainer.

    Background: how the commission works

    Snohomish County’s Charter Review Commission is elected (voters chose the 15 members on the November 2025 ballot). In the 2026 cycle, Chair Brett Gailey represented District 5 and Vice Chair Mark James represented District 1; the commission began meeting in January 2026. It is not the same body as the City of Everett’s appointed Charter Review Committee. The county commission can only recommend amendments; the County Council holds its own hearings and transmits approved amendments to the auditor for the ballot; voters have the final say. The public deadline to submit new amendment ideas was noon on April 8, 2026 — after that date, May hearings were for comment on the five advanced proposals, not for new submissions. After this cycle the commission dissolves until the next review around 2035–2036. Official materials remain on the county’s Charter Review Commission page.

    What it means for Everett voters

    Every Everett resident is also a Snohomish County voter, so these five propositions appear in the same November ballot envelope as city races and any Everett city charter questions. Practical angles:

    • Prop. 3 (nonpartisan offices) changes how County Executive, County Council, and Prosecutor candidates appear on the ballot — no party preference label.
    • Prop. 5 (tax supermajority) does not roll back existing levies. It raises the future threshold for councilmanic tax increases after January 1, 2027. The county’s statutory annual increase limits still operate separately.
    • Prop. 1 and 2 are budget-structure rules: which services get priority when revenue is tight, and how rainy-day / catastrophic funds are protected.
    • Prop. 4 is the transparency portal / public financial-access requirement — useful for residents who currently rely on public-records requests for spending and contract detail.

    Everett is split across County Council districts; check your voter pamphlet for your district’s council race alongside these countywide propositions.

    What it means for Everett businesses

    • Prop. 5 changes the politics of future councilmanic tax increases; it is not a commercial-property-tax cut.
    • Prop. 4 improves visibility into county procurement and spending if the transparency requirement is implemented as described — relevant for vendors and firms that bid county work.
    • Prop. 1 prioritizes foundational services in budget fights; discretionary programs absorb cuts first in lean years.
    • None of the five amendments cancels existing county contracts by themselves; watch implementing ordinances after the election for operational detail.

    Timeline (completed and remaining)

    • May 13 / 20 / 27, 2026 — commission public hearings (Arlington, Monroe, Mountlake Terrace) — completed. Detail below.
    • May 29, 2026 — commission final adoption vote — completed; five amendments transmitted to council.
    • June 3, 2026 — County Council unanimously authorized sending the amendments to the auditor — completed.
    • November 3, 2026 — general election; Propositions 1–5 on the ballot.
    • After election — any approved amendments move into implementation (effective dates vary; Prop. 5’s tax rule is written for increases after January 1, 2027).

    Completed May 2026 public hearings (history)

    All three hearings started at 5:30 p.m. The commission rotated locations so different parts of the county had a closer venue. Contemporary local coverage (including Lynnwood Times) paired the first hearing with the nonpartisan-offices and tax-supermajority proposals; the county calendar listed dates without locking each hearing to a single proposal. Written comment on any of the five was appropriate through the May 29 vote.

    • Wednesday, May 13 — Arlington City Hall, 238 N. Olympia Ave., Arlington. Press coverage identified the focus as the proposals that became ballot Prop. 3 (nonpartisan offices; old Proposal 5) and Prop. 5 (tax supermajority; old Proposal 21).
    • Wednesday, May 20 — Monroe City Hall, 806 W. Main St., Monroe. Special meeting / public hearing on the commission calendar; remaining proposals in the package (old 13, 14, 22 → Props. 1, 2, 4) were part of the May hearing series.
    • Wednesday, May 27 — Mountlake Terrace City Hall, 23204 58th Ave. W., Mountlake Terrace. Final hearing of the public-comment phase.

    Meetings were also available remotely via Zoom (webinar link and call-in numbers remain posted on the county CRC page: meeting ID 883-0893 2549; audio 1-253-215-8782 or 1-206-337-9723). Those remote options were for the hearing phase; the live question for voters now is the November 3 ballot.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the Snohomish County Charter Review Commission?
    A 15-member elected body that reviews the county’s home-rule charter every ten years and may recommend amendments for the ballot.

    Are the May 2026 hearings still ahead?
    No. Those hearings and the May 29 commission vote are finished. The live question now is how you vote on November 3.

    Can the County Council rewrite the amendments?
    Under the home-rule process, the council transmits the commission’s amendments and handles ballot-summary / pamphlet process; it does not freely rewrite the commission’s adopted text. Rely on election materials for the binding language.

    How is this different from Everett’s city charter review?
    Separate body, separate charter, separate ballot questions. The city committee is appointed; the county commission is elected. Both can appear on the same November ballot for Everett residents.

    Could residents still submit brand-new proposals after April 2026?
    No. The deadline for new proposed amendments from the public was noon on April 8, 2026. The May hearings were for comment on the five proposals already advanced, not for adding a sixth.

    How did the old “Proposal 14” and “Proposal 21” four-vote rules differ?
    Under the commission’s working numbers, Proposal 14 (now ballot Prop. 2) was about protecting budget-stabilization / rainy-day funds, including supermajority rules to tap them. Proposal 21 (now ballot Prop. 5) raises the threshold to approve councilmanic tax increases to a four-fifths vote, for increases after January 1, 2027. Similar four-vote mechanics, opposite kinds of decisions.

    Where do I read the official text?
    Start with the county Charter Review Commission page and the auditor’s November 3, 2026 sample ballot. HeraldNet’s June 24, 2026 explainer summarizes each proposition in news form.

  • Mason County Infrastructure: PUD 3 Fiber & Belfair Sewer

    Mason County Infrastructure: PUD 3 Fiber & Belfair Sewer

    Two significant infrastructure developments are unfolding across Mason County this week — one offering a limited-time opportunity for hundreds of rural residents to lock in free fiber internet connections before the end of May, and another marking a new chapter in the long-running debate over how to handle Belfair’s wastewater future.

    Act Now: PUD 3’s Free Fiber Application Window Closes May 31

    More than 680 homes and businesses along the Cloquallum Road corridor in north Mason County are now eligible to apply for high-speed gigabit fiber internet — and the free application window closes in just three and a half weeks.

    Mason County Public Utility District No. 3 announced in February 2026 the completion of Phase 2 of its Cloquallum Communities Fiberhood project, triggering a new round of application letters to property owners in the Wivell Road, Loertscher Road, and Cloquallum Fiberhoods areas. But the window is closing fast: PUD 3 has waived the standard $250 construction application fee only through May 31, 2026. After that date, anyone who applies will owe the full $250 upfront.

    The stakes are real. When the Cloquallum Communities project reaches full completion — targeted for October 2026 — residents in these rural stretches will go from dial-up-like speeds of roughly 1.5 Mbps to symmetrical gigabit internet at 1,000/1,000 Mbps, among the fastest residential broadband available anywhere in Washington state. Monthly service is expected to run approximately $85 per month through PUD 3’s open-access fiber network.

    That “open access” model is worth understanding. PUD 3 builds and owns the physical fiber infrastructure, but multiple retail internet service providers can deliver service over that single cable. Residents choose their own provider — and can switch providers without needing a new connection installed. The model has already delivered results: more than 3,000 homes and businesses across Mason County are now connected to PUD 3 fiber through prior Fiberhood builds.

    The Cloquallum project is funded in part through an American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant awarded to PUD 3 by the Washington State Broadband Office in late 2023. Phase 1 of the project wrapped in July 2025, bringing the mainline fiber network to the Lake Arrowhead, Star Lake, Bulb Farm, and Lost Lake areas near Cloquallum Road. Phase 2 focuses on the Wivell Road and Loertscher Road communities and the broader Cloquallum Road Fiberhood area, running from west of Bear Trap Boulevard east toward Rock Creek Road.

    Residents who have already received an announcement letter should apply as soon as possible at pud3.org. Those who live in the project area and have not received a letter should contact PUD 3 directly to verify their eligibility before the May 31 deadline passes. After five years of engineering, grant-writing, and construction, gigabit internet is finally arriving in one of Mason County’s most historically underserved broadband corridors — but only to those who get their applications in on time.

    Belfair Sewer: Bremerton Now on the Hook for Feasibility Study

    About 20 miles to the south, a very different infrastructure question is moving forward — carefully.

    Mason County commissioners in February 2026 signed off on revisions to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the City of Bremerton regarding potential sewer service to the Puget Sound Industrial Center, a business corridor in north Belfair. The key change in the updated agreement: Bremerton is now required to pay for Mason County’s share of the feasibility study before the work can begin.

    Under the revised MOU, both parties have committed to a comprehensive feasibility study including preliminary engineering and a financial evaluation of the capital, operational, and long-term costs involved. If Bremerton pays, the study must be completed within 180 days. Mason County commissioners will then have 90 days to determine whether moving forward is in the best interest of county ratepayers.

    The Belfair sewer system has been under pressure for years. The Belfair Wastewater Reclamation Facility (WWRF) storage pond has a documented structural concern — a suspected sinkhole first flagged by the Washington State Department of Ecology in 2016 — that the county has not fully remediated. Questions about whether extending service to serve Bremerton’s industrial interests would be fair to existing Belfair ratepayers generated significant debate when commissioners first considered the original MOU.

    Adding further complexity, the Belfair WWRF sits within the usual and accustomed fishing area of the Squaxin Island Tribe, and any expansion carries potential implications for salmon habitat in Coulter Creek. Under the revised agreement, Mason County is required to consult with tribal representatives before making any final decisions on expansion.

    For residents who use or are considering connecting to the Belfair sewer system, the next several months will be worth watching closely. If Bremerton initiates payment, a 180-day study clock begins ticking — and commissioner briefings, public meetings, and Belfair Sewer Advisory Committee sessions will be where the real debate plays out. If Bremerton does not pay, the study stalls — and the question of Belfair’s long-term wastewater capacity remains unresolved.

    What to Watch

    On the fiber front, May 31 is a hard deadline. Whether you live off Wivell Road, Loertscher Road, or anywhere along the Cloquallum Road corridor in north Mason County, submitting a construction application before that date saves you $250. Visit pud3.org or contact Mason County PUD No. 3 at their Shelton office for details on the application process.

    On the sewer front, the clock starts when Bremerton writes the check. Mason County residents can track developments through masoncountywa.gov and the Belfair Sewer Advisory Committee page at masoncountywa.gov/ac/belfair-sewer/.

    Related Expansion Coverage

    This beat post was expanded into a full knowledge cluster by the Mason County Minute Variant Expander on May 8, 2026:

  • Mason County Economy: OneStop Northwest & SR-3 Port Deal

    Mason County Economy: OneStop Northwest & SR-3 Port Deal

    If you moved to Mason County recently — whether you settled in Shelton, Belfair, Allyn, or anywhere in between — two stories from this week give you useful context about how this county’s economy is structured and what’s being built right now.

    OneStop Northwest: A Mason County Business Resource Worth Knowing About

    One of the common frustrations for business owners and households new to Mason County is discovering that the county’s commercial services are more dispersed than in larger metro areas. OneStop Northwest LLC is attempting to change that for a specific and practical set of needs.

    The company — a minority-owned business based in Union, Washington, with more than 20 years of operating history — is opening a showroom at 124 N. 2nd St., Suite A in downtown Shelton on May 22, 2026. Its grand opening runs from 4:30 to 7:00 p.m. and is free to attend (RSVP at onestopnw.com).

    What OneStop Northwest does: promotional products and branded apparel, commercial printing, custom company stores, website development, SEO and social media marketing, digital marketing, IT support, payroll automation, and government contracting for internet and phone services. If you’re starting or running a business in Mason County and currently sourcing those services from outside the county, this showroom is worth a visit.

    The company is a member of the Shelton-Mason County Chamber of Commerce. The Chamber is at masonchamber.com and is one of the most useful resources for newcomers trying to understand Mason County’s business network — member listings, events, and connections to local government contacts all live there.

    How Mason County’s Port Districts Work — and Why the SR-3 Discussion Matters

    New residents are sometimes surprised to learn how many special-purpose public agencies operate in Mason County alongside city and county government. Port districts are among them. Mason County has several: the Port of Shelton (the largest), the Port of Allyn, the Port of Grapeview, the Port of Hoodsport, and others.

    Port districts are quasi-governmental agencies with an elected board of commissioners. Their core purposes under Washington state law include economic development, industrial development, and waterfront and marina infrastructure. They can levy property taxes within their district boundaries, accept grants, and own property. They hold regular public meetings that are open to the community.

    Right now, two of north Mason County’s smaller ports — the Port of Allyn and the Port of Grapeview — are exploring something worth understanding if you live in the Allyn-Grapeview area: a joint purchase of a $2 million commercial and light industrial property on SR-3 near East Harding Hill Road.

    Port of Allyn Executive Director Travis Merrill raised the opportunity at the Port of Grapeview’s April 2026 regular meeting. The property has existing tenants, some vacancy, and potential for future expansion. The financial case: each port could earn $15,000 to $18,000 per year after expenses from leasing and rental income.

    The larger picture Merrill described is one that shapes north Mason County’s development landscape for years: small port districts in Washington face financial pressure from inflation and rising operating costs. Acquiring income-generating commercial property is one lever they have to build financial stability. And under Washington law, a port district that owns industrial property has tools to actively attract business tenants to that corridor — which over time means jobs and services in the Allyn-Grapeview area.

    Neither board has voted to purchase. The next steps are a site visit and research into how two independent port districts can jointly own a single asset. Watch for updates at public meetings for both the Port of Allyn (portofallyn.com) and the Port of Grapeview.

    What to Do with This Information as a New Resident

    The May 22 OneStop Northwest grand opening is a free community event in downtown Shelton — a good way to meet local business operators and see what the county seat’s commercial district looks like. It’s also a chance to evaluate whether OneStop’s services fit any needs you have, whether for a business or for community projects.

    For the SR-3 port story: if you live in the Allyn or Grapeview areas, attending a Port of Allyn or Port of Grapeview meeting is a good introduction to how local public agencies operate. These meetings are publicly noticed, short, and genuinely accessible — a different register from county commissioner meetings, and a useful window into north Mason’s economic direction.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What are port districts in Mason County and how do they affect residents?

    Port districts are elected special-purpose public agencies with authority over economic and industrial development, waterfront infrastructure, and marina operations. They can levy property taxes within their boundaries, own property, and accept grants. Residents in a port district’s service area pay a small portion of their property taxes to the port. Mason County has several ports including the Port of Shelton, Port of Allyn, Port of Grapeview, and Port of Hoodsport.

    Where is the OneStop Northwest showroom in Shelton?

    The showroom is at 124 N. 2nd St., Suite A in downtown Shelton. The grand opening is May 22, 2026, from 4:30 to 7:00 p.m. RSVP at onestopnw.com. The event is free.

    What is the Shelton-Mason County Chamber of Commerce and how can new residents use it?

    The Chamber is the primary business membership organization in Mason County. It maintains a member directory of local businesses, hosts networking events, and connects businesses with county economic resources. New residents and business owners can find it at masonchamber.com.

    What is the SR-3 commercial property the ports are considering buying?

    It is a $2 million commercial and light industrial property on State Route 3 near East Harding Hill Road in north Mason County, in the Allyn area. The Port of Allyn and Port of Grapeview are researching a joint purchase to generate rental income and support future industrial development in the corridor.

    How can I attend Port of Allyn or Port of Grapeview public meetings?

    Both port districts hold regular public meetings that are open to the community. The Port of Allyn’s website is portofallyn.com. Meeting agendas and schedules are posted publicly. No registration is required to attend.


    Related Coverage

  • Port of Allyn Grapeview Weigh $2M SR-3 Property Deal

    Port of Allyn Grapeview Weigh $2M SR-3 Property Deal

    Two public meetings held in April 2026 set up decisions that Mason County civic watchers should track through the summer. At the Port of Grapeview’s April regular meeting, commissioners formally agreed to research a $2 million joint commercial property purchase with the Port of Allyn — a governance experiment that would require two independent Washington port districts to share ownership of a single asset. And in Shelton, OneStop Northwest LLC has finalized its new downtown location, the product of a business expansion that moves a Union-based company into the county seat’s commercial core.

    The Port Districts’ $2M Shared Asset Question

    What Port of Allyn Executive Director Travis Merrill brought to Port of Grapeview Commissioner Mike Blaisdell is not a routine port purchase. The SR-3 property near East Harding Hill Road — a $2 million commercial and light industrial site with existing tenants and room for expansion — would, if acquired, be owned jointly by two separate special-purpose districts. That is not unprecedented in Washington state port history, but it requires research, and the Grapeview board directed Managing Official Amanda Montgomery to find out how other port districts have structured such arrangements.

    The financial case Merrill has made to the Grapeview board is straightforward: after expenses, each district could earn $15,000 to $18,000 per year from the property. For the Port of Grapeview — small enough that insurance costs alone represent a budget challenge — that recurring revenue would materially improve financial stability.

    “There is no way that either of our ports, or even any of the ports in Mason County except the Port of Shelton, is going to be able to weather the storm that seems to be coming without some sort of financial assets,” Merrill said at the April meeting.

    Commissioner Doug Jones agreed the property was worth evaluating. “It’s something we should at least talk about,” he said, acknowledging the $2 million price tag is “a significant amount of money.”

    What civic watchers should track:

    • Site visit: Both port districts agreed to visit the SR-3 property before any purchase commitment. Watch for this to be announced at upcoming Port of Allyn and Port of Grapeview regular meetings.
    • Shared ownership legal structure: Amanda Montgomery has been tasked with researching how Washington port districts can co-hold an asset. The legal framework she surfaces will likely determine whether this deal proceeds and in what form.
    • Board votes: Any purchase at $2 million requires formal board action at both districts. Neither board has voted — this is still in preliminary evaluation.

    The Port of Allyn entered this conversation from a position of relative stability. Its 2026 state accountability audit found no findings — a clean bill of health on public fund management — and the port recouped the full $99,731 it spent removing the sunken vessel Sea Bear from Hood Canal waters, with Washington State’s DNR Derelict Vessels Program providing 100% reimbursement.

    OneStop Northwest: A Business Milestone in the County Seat

    For civic watchers tracking downtown Shelton’s commercial activity, the May 22 ribbon-cutting for OneStop Northwest at 124 N. 2nd St., Suite A is a data point. The Shelton-Mason County Chamber of Commerce is participating. The grand opening is at 4:30 p.m.

    OneStop Northwest’s expansion from Union into a downtown Shelton showroom reflects the same bet Merrill is making with the SR-3 property: that Mason County’s local economy has enough density to support professional services and commercial real estate that local operators control.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What governance structure would a Port of Allyn–Port of Grapeview joint property ownership require?

    Two independent Washington port districts would need to establish a legal framework for co-holding an asset — including how operating decisions are made, how expenses are split, how revenues are distributed, and what happens if one district wants to exit the arrangement. Port of Grapeview Managing Official Amanda Montgomery has been tasked with researching models used by other Washington port districts.

    Has the Port of Grapeview board voted to purchase the SR-3 property?

    No. As of the April 2026 regular meeting, commissioners agreed only to schedule a site visit and research the shared ownership legal framework. No purchase motion has been made at either district.

    What is the Port of Allyn’s current financial condition?

    The Port of Allyn received a clean 2026 Washington State accountability audit with no findings, and recouped $99,731 in full from the DNR Derelict Vessels Program for the Sea Bear removal. Executive Director Travis Merrill has, however, been candid that small port districts face growing financial pressure and need diversified revenue sources.

    What is the assessed value of the SR-3 property?

    Approximately $2 million. The property has a history of commercial and light industrial use, has existing tenants, and includes space that is currently vacant with potential for future expansion.

    When will the port districts make a final decision on the SR-3 property?

    No timeline has been set. The next steps are a site visit by commissioners from both districts and research into shared ownership models. Follow public meeting agendas for the Port of Allyn and Port of Grapeview for updates.


    Related Coverage

  • Snohomish County Ordinances Target Homelessness & Fentanyl

    Snohomish County Ordinances Target Homelessness & Fentanyl

    A Snohomish County Council member introduced four new ordinances this week that would significantly shift how the county approaches homelessness, behavioral health treatment, and drug policy — including a proposal to prohibit county funding from being used to purchase drug paraphernalia and another that would criminalize exposing children to fentanyl.

    Council Member Nate Nehring, who represents District 1 on the Snohomish County Council, introduced the package and outlined each proposal in a May 6, 2026 column published in The Daily Herald.

    For Everett residents, the legislation touches on issues that directly affect city neighborhoods — from the cost and structure of county-funded shelter and housing programs to the legal framework around drug exposure in homes with children. The four bills are proposals; they have not yet been voted on. Each must go through committee review and at least one public hearing before the full council takes action.

    The Four Proposals, One by One

    Proposal 1: Removing the County’s Housing First Preference

    The first ordinance would prevent the county from requiring county-funded housing programs to adhere to strict “Housing First” policies. Instead, Nehring wrote, the proposal would “level the playing field for entities which prioritize accountability.”

    Housing First is a model used by many government housing programs that prioritizes placing people in stable housing before addressing other challenges such as addiction or mental health treatment. Under Nehring’s proposal, county-funded programs would not be required to follow the Housing First framework, opening the door for the county to fund programs that incorporate treatment requirements as part of their model.

    Proposal 2: Directing More AHBH Dollars Toward Behavioral Health Facilities

    The second ordinance would redirect a larger share of the county’s Affordable Housing and Behavioral Health (AHBH) Fund toward behavioral health facilities specifically.

    Nehring wrote that $3 million annually — about 12.2% of AHBH funds — currently goes toward behavioral health facilities. The proposal would increase that share to 20%, expanding the funding available for treatment, recovery, and stabilization services.

    The AHBH fund is a sales-tax-funded source — authorized under state law — that the County Council allocates to housing and behavioral health projects across Snohomish County. In April 2026, the county council awarded $23 million from the fund to six housing projects, including three in Everett: a 172-bed shelter expansion, a 28-unit affordable apartment building, and a 58-unit transit-oriented mixed-use building. Read: How $23 Million in Housing Money Moved Without a Tax Vote

    Proposal 3: Prohibiting County Funds for Drug Paraphernalia

    The third ordinance would prohibit Snohomish County from using local taxpayer dollars to purchase and distribute drug paraphernalia. Nehring described the proposal as intended to “ensure that county government does not facilitate activities that enable ongoing drug abuse,” with county policy instead focused on “treatment, recovery, and accountability.”

    The specific definitions and any exemptions — including for medications such as naloxone, the overdose-reversal drug — would be determined in the ordinance’s legislative text as it moves through the review process.

    Proposal 4: Child Fentanyl Exposure Ordinance

    The fourth ordinance would criminalize the exposure of minors to fentanyl at the county level, modeled on a similar law recently enacted by the City of Everett.

    Washington State law already criminalizes exposing children to methamphetamine, but does not specifically address fentanyl. Nehring wrote that “local governments around the state are now taking action to address child fentanyl exposure.” The Snohomish County proposal would extend similar protections to cover fentanyl exposure at the county level.

    What Comes Next for the Legislation

    Nehring introduced the four proposals this week at the Snohomish County Council. None has yet been voted on. Snohomish County ordinances go through a committee review and public hearing process before the full council votes on them. The timeline for hearings on each bill will be set by the council’s legislative calendar.

    The Snohomish County Council has five members elected by district. For any proposal to become law, a majority — three votes — would be required.

    The Policy Context

    Snohomish County — with Everett as its county seat — has invested substantially in housing and behavioral health programs in recent years, using dedicated sales tax revenues to fund shelter, affordable housing, and treatment projects.

    Nehring’s four-bill package reflects a debate playing out in counties and cities across Washington State about how government housing programs should be structured, whether treatment requirements should be part of publicly funded housing programs, and how counties should allocate limited behavioral health dollars.

    Nehring represents District 1 on the Snohomish County Council and lives in Arlington. In his column, he described witnessing the day-to-day work of social workers embedded with law enforcement and said current policy approaches “do not appear to be solving the problem.”

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Housing First?

    Housing First is a policy framework that prioritizes placing people experiencing homelessness in stable housing as quickly as possible, without requiring sobriety or participation in treatment as a precondition. It is used in many county and state housing programs across Washington.

    Have these bills passed?

    No. As of May 6, the four ordinances have been introduced. They must go through committee review and at least one public hearing before a full council vote.

    Does this affect the City of Everett’s budget or the EMS levy?

    No. These are county-level ordinances. They would affect how Snohomish County allocates county funds, not the City of Everett’s budget or any pending city ballot measures.

    How is the AHBH fund paid for?

    The Affordable Housing and Behavioral Health Fund is funded by a sales tax authorized by state law (RCW 82.14.530 and RCW 82.14.540). The county council allocates the proceeds through its regular legislative process; no separate voter approval is required for each award.

    Can Everett residents comment on county legislation?

    Yes. Snohomish County residents can testify at County Council meetings, submit written comments through the county website, or contact their district representative directly. The County Council meets at 3000 Rockefeller Ave in Everett.

    What To Do Next

    Track the bills: Visit snohomishcountywa.gov and navigate to the County Council’s meeting calendar to follow committee schedules for these four ordinances.

    Submit written comment: Contact the Snohomish County Council office with your perspective on any of the four proposals before they reach a public hearing.

    Attend a council meeting: The Snohomish County Council meets at 3000 Rockefeller Ave, Everett. Meeting dates and agendas are posted at snohomishcountywa.gov.

    Find your council district: Visit snohomishcountywa.gov to identify which of the five council members represents your area.

  • Everett CB 2604-24: Appointive Officer Compensation Changes

    Everett CB 2604-24: Appointive Officer Compensation Changes

    Featured snippet:

    Q: What is Council Bill 2604-24, and when does the Everett City Council vote on it?
    A: CB 2604-24 amends Chapter 2.74 of the Everett Municipal Code, which governs compensation and fringe benefits for the city’s appointive officers, classified nonrepresented employees, and councilmembers themselves. First reading is at the May 6, 2026 council meeting. Third and final reading is scheduled for May 20, 2026.

    Wednesday night at City Hall, the Everett City Council will take up the first reading of an ordinance most residents will never read but every resident pays for.

    Council Bill 2604-24 is on the May 6 agenda as a Proposed Action Item — a 1st reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 2.74 of the Everett Municipal Code, which is the section of city code that governs how Everett pays its appointed department heads, its classified nonrepresented employees, and its own city councilmembers. The third and final reading is scheduled for May 20, 2026, at the next regular council meeting after Wednesday’s vote.

    The ordinance itself is short on the agenda — one line on a single page of consent and action items. But the chapter it amends is the section of code that decides how much the city pays the people running its departments and what benefits they get for that work. For a city facing a projected $14 million 2027 general fund gap (covered earlier in this desk’s run log on April 21), how the appointed leadership is compensated is not a side question.

    This article breaks down what Chapter 2.74 actually does, what’s likely to be inside CB 2604-24, the calendar between Wednesday and May 20, and how residents who want to weigh in can do so before the third reading.

    What Changes for Residents

    Three things to know up front:

    The vote is not final on Wednesday. Wednesday is the 1st reading. The final vote is May 20. That gives residents two weeks to read the ordinance bill, watch the May 6 deliberation, and submit public comment before the council acts.

    This is not a salary-setting vote for elected councilmembers in isolation. Chapter 2.74 covers three categories: appointive officers (the people the mayor appoints to run departments), classified nonrepresented employees (city staff who are not covered by a union contract), and the city council itself. Any change to one article of the chapter typically gets discussed alongside the others.

    You can read the actual bill before the meeting. The full PDF of CB 2604-24 is posted to the city’s Agenda Center under the May 6, 2026 agenda packet. The link to the document — including any staff memo explaining what the changes do — is published on everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter at least 72 hours before the meeting under state public-meeting rules.

    What Chapter 2.74 Actually Covers

    The Everett Municipal Code organizes Chapter 2.74 into three articles, each covering a different category of city personnel:

    Article I — Appointive Officers. These are the department heads and senior staff appointed by the mayor — the people who actually run departments like Public Works, Parks, the Police Department’s civilian leadership, the Fire Department’s civilian leadership, and similar roles. Under existing code, the mayor sets the workweek for appointive officers as needed for “efficient functioning of city government.” Appointive officers who are exempt from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act do not get premium pay for overtime, callbacks, or holidays, and no appointive officer gets longevity premium pay.

    The chapter also defines insurance benefits for these officers: basic and major medical, vision, and dental coverage for the officer and eligible dependents, with the full-time officer required to contribute ten percent of the cost of medical coverage.

    Article II — Classified Nonrepresented Employees. These are city employees who are not in a union bargaining unit. Their compensation and benefits are set through this chapter rather than through collective bargaining.

    Article III — City Council. This article covers how Everett pays its own councilmembers and council president, including any expense reimbursements and benefits.

    Chapter 2.74 is distinct from Chapter 2.72, which handles general employee compensation, and Chapter 2.70, which sets the broader Performance Management and Compensation Plan. The salary ordinance for represented employees lives elsewhere in the code.

    What’s Likely Inside CB 2604-24

    The agenda title for CB 2604-24 reads: “Adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 2.74 of the Everett Municipal Code, which pertains to appointive employee compensation and fringe benefits.”

    The agenda doesn’t say specifically which sections of the chapter are being amended. That’s standard format for first-reading agenda titles — the substance is in the bill PDF in the agenda packet, not in the headline. Residents who want to know exactly what changes the ordinance proposes need to download the bill itself from the May 6 agenda packet at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter.

    What is typical for ordinances of this type — based on how Chapter 2.74 has been amended in prior years — is one or more of the following: an adjustment to the cost-of-living formula, a change to the fringe-benefit contribution percentages, an update to the language defining which positions are “appointive” versus “classified,” a clarification of FLSA-exempt status for specific roles, or a reorganization of how the three articles interact.

    Residents reading the bill should look for: which sections are added, which are deleted, which are modified, and whether the changes are prospective (forward-looking only) or retroactive to a prior pay period.

    The Calendar Between Wednesday and May 20

    Everett ordinances generally get three readings before adoption:

    • 1st Reading: Wednesday, May 6, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. — Council Chambers, 3002 Wetmore Avenue. The bill is introduced, staff may offer a brief explanation, and councilmembers can ask questions. There is typically no full debate at first reading; the bill is “read” and held over.
    • 2nd Reading: would normally be May 13, 2026 — at the regular Wednesday meeting that week. The bill receives further consideration. Amendments are most commonly offered at second reading.
    • 3rd & Final Reading: Wednesday, May 20, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. — the agenda title for CB 2604-24 specifically lists “(3rd & Final Reading 5/20/26)” — meaning the final vote, in current city practice, is consolidated into a single agenda item on the third meeting in the cycle.

    If amendments are added between first and final reading, those amendments themselves can extend the process. Residents who want to follow the bill should set a reminder for May 20.

    How to Weigh In Before May 20

    Everett’s council meetings include a Public Comment period at the start of every regular meeting. Residents who want to comment on CB 2604-24 have several paths:

    In person at the meeting. Public Comment runs near the start of every regular Wednesday meeting. Residents arrive at Council Chambers, 3002 Wetmore Avenue, before 6:30 p.m. and sign up at the door. The standard time limit is three minutes per speaker.

    By Zoom. Register at everettwa.gov/speakerform no later than 30 minutes before the meeting starts. The city’s notice requires that you identify the topic you wish to address.

    By email. Send written comments to Council@everettwa.gov. The city notes that emailed comments submitted at least 24 hours before the meeting are distributed to all councilmembers and appropriate staff. Comments sent later may not reach councilmembers before the vote.

    By mail. 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 9A, Everett, WA 98201. Allow time for delivery if you go this route.

    Comments on non-agenda items may be asked to be submitted in writing if the comment does not address an issue of “broad public interest,” per the city’s published guidance. CB 2604-24 is on the agenda for Wednesday and again on May 20, so it qualifies as an agenda item for both meetings.

    Watching the Meeting

    Wednesday’s meeting will be broadcast live and recorded. Two ways to follow along:

    Live and archived video: YouTube.com/EverettCity. The full archive of past meetings is searchable from there.

    Agenda and bill PDFs: everettwa.gov/citycouncil and the AgendaCenter for the May 6, 2026 packet.

    If you cannot watch Wednesday but want to be informed before May 20, the meeting recording typically posts within 24 hours and the official minutes — including the roll-call vote on first reading and any amendments offered — are added to the May 6 agenda page on the city website within a week.

    Why This Matters Inside Everett’s Bigger Budget Picture

    Earlier in this desk’s run log (April 21, 2026) we covered Everett’s projected $14 million 2027 general fund gap and the four levers the city is weighing to close it: the regional fire RFA, Sno-Isle library regionalization, another levy lid lift, and possible annexation. Three of those four require voter approval.

    How the city pays its appointive officers and classified nonrepresented employees is not the largest line in the general fund, but it is one of the lines the city has direct discretion over without going to voters. Any ordinance amending Chapter 2.74 in 2026 is happening inside that budget context whether the bill mentions the gap or not. Residents reading CB 2604-24 should look for whether the ordinance is structured to add cost, hold cost flat, or save cost — and whether the staff memo that accompanies the bill addresses the 2027 budget connection.

    That answer is in the agenda packet, not in the headline.

    What to Do Next

    Before Wednesday:

    • Download CB 2604-24 from the May 6, 2026 agenda packet at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter.
    • Read the staff memo (if attached) for the city’s explanation of what changes and why.
    • If you want to speak at Wednesday’s meeting in person, plan to arrive at 3002 Wetmore Avenue before 6:30 p.m. Wednesday. To speak via Zoom, register at everettwa.gov/speakerform by 6 p.m.

    Between May 6 and May 20:

    • Watch the May 6 first-reading deliberation on YouTube.com/EverettCity to see which councilmembers engage and what they ask.
    • Submit written comment to Council@everettwa.gov at least 24 hours before May 20 to ensure councilmembers receive it before the final vote.
    • Track whether any amendments are filed between readings — those typically appear on the agenda for the second reading the week before final.

    On May 20:

    • The 3rd and final reading is scheduled for the Wednesday, May 20 meeting at 6:30 p.m.
    • Public comment is again accepted before the vote.
    • The roll call shows where each councilmember landed.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What does Chapter 2.74 of the Everett Municipal Code govern?

    Chapter 2.74 covers compensation and fringe benefits for the City of Everett’s appointive officers (department heads appointed by the mayor), classified nonrepresented employees (city staff not covered by union contracts), and the city council itself.

    When is the first reading of CB 2604-24?

    Wednesday, May 6, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers, 3002 Wetmore Avenue.

    When is the final vote?

    Wednesday, May 20, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. The agenda item for May 6 specifically lists “(3rd & Final Reading 5/20/26).”

    Where can I read the actual ordinance bill?

    The PDF of CB 2604-24 is in the May 6, 2026 agenda packet at everettwa.gov/AgendaCenter, along with any staff memo explaining the changes.

    How do I submit public comment?

    By email to Council@everettwa.gov (at least 24 hours before the meeting to ensure councilmembers receive it), in person at Council Chambers, by Zoom (register at everettwa.gov/speakerform no later than 30 minutes before the meeting), or by mail to 2930 Wetmore Avenue, Suite 9A, Everett, WA 98201.

    Does this ordinance set salaries for elected city councilmembers?

    Chapter 2.74 includes Article III on City Council compensation, but the agenda title for CB 2604-24 specifically references “appointive employee compensation and fringe benefits” — the appointed-officer side of the chapter. Residents who want to know which articles the bill modifies need to read the bill PDF.

    Is this connected to Everett’s 2027 budget gap?

    Everett is projecting a roughly $14 million 2027 general fund gap. How the city pays its appointive officers and classified nonrepresented employees is one of the discretionary lines in the general fund. The ordinance does not have to mention the gap to be relevant to it; residents should look at the staff memo for whether the city addresses the connection.

    Where do I watch the meeting?

    Live and archived at YouTube.com/EverettCity. The May 6 meeting starts at 6:30 p.m.

  • Snohomish County Candidate Filing: 2026 Election Guide

    Snohomish County Candidate Filing: 2026 Election Guide

    Featured snippet:

    Q: When does Snohomish County 2026 candidate filing open and close?
    A: Filing opens at 8 a.m. Monday, May 4, 2026, and closes at 5 p.m. Friday, May 8, 2026. Candidates can file online through the Washington Secretary of State at sos.wa.gov/elections, or in person at Snohomish County Elections, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Admin West Building, 1st Floor, Everett.

    If you have ever told a friend “somebody should run against this person,” Monday is the morning when “somebody” turns into “you, by Friday at five o’clock.”

    Snohomish County’s 2026 candidate filing window opens at 8 a.m. on Monday, May 4, and closes at 5 p.m. on Friday, May 8. That’s the entire window. Five business days. After Friday at 5 p.m., the November 2026 ballot is locked, and any office without a candidate filed against the incumbent simply re-elects the incumbent by default.

    For Everett residents, that means this week is when the actual list of choices for November gets written — not by a campaign, not by a party, but by whoever walks in or logs on between Monday morning and Friday evening.

    What Changes for Residents This Week

    The most important thing for residents to know: the November 2026 ballot is decided this week, not in November. Any race with only one filed candidate is over before the primary even runs. Any race with two or more candidates from the same party in a top-two primary state like Washington heads to the August 4 primary, where the top two finishers — regardless of party — advance to November.

    That’s it. That’s the structure. Filing week is the gate. Everything downstream — the August primary, the October mailing of voters’ pamphlets, the November general — is downstream of who walked in this week.

    The Everett City Council itself is not on the 2026 ballot. The next Everett Council seats up are the at-large positions 6 and 7, scheduled for the end of 2027. So if you were thinking about a run at City Hall, this is not your year. But several other offices that touch life in Everett are open this cycle, including Snohomish County Council seats, county-wide constitutional offices, and judicial positions covering the courts that handle most everyday legal matters in the city.

    The full official list of offices on the 2026 ballot is maintained by Snohomish County Elections at the 2026 Candidate Guide linked from snohomishcountywa.gov/5729/Run-for-Office. Some offices file with Snohomish County Elections, others file with the Washington Secretary of State directly — the Candidate Guide tells you which is which for every position.

    How Filing Works

    Snohomish County Elections has set up four ways to file:

    Online (recommended). File through the Washington Secretary of State’s Candidate Filing portal at sos.wa.gov/elections. This is the path the county pushes hardest because it timestamps automatically, accepts payment, and produces a confirmation email. Most candidates file this way.

    In person. Walk in to Snohomish County Elections at 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Admin West Building, 1st Floor, Everett, WA 98201. The office is open 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday during the filing window. Bring identification. Bring payment for the filing fee.

    By email. Send a Declaration of Candidacy to elections@snoco.gov.

    By fax. Send to (425) 355-3444.

    The phone number for questions is (425) 388-3444. If you have any doubt about which office you’re filing for, which jurisdiction the office sits in, or whether your address falls inside the right district, call before you file. A misfiled candidacy is harder to fix than a delayed one.

    The Filing Fee

    Most positions with a salary require a filing fee equal to 1% of the annual salary for the office. So a position that pays $100,000 a year requires a $1,000 filing fee, due at the time of filing or no later than 5 p.m. Friday, May 8.

    Two important practical notes on the fee:

    First, the 1% rule is real money for some offices. If you are running for a position that pays well, plan for the fee in advance — it must be paid during the filing window itself.

    Second, candidates who cannot afford the filing fee can submit a petition with signatures of registered voters in the jurisdiction in lieu of the fee. The signature requirements vary by office. Snohomish County Elections has the petition forms and the signature-count requirements for each position, available through the Run for Office page on the county website or by calling the elections office directly.

    What Sits Above and Around This Week

    Filing week sits inside a longer civic calendar that residents will see roll out across 2026:

    August 4 is the primary election. For races with three or more candidates, the top two advance regardless of party. For races with one or two candidates total, there is effectively no primary — both candidates simply move on to November.

    November 3 is the general election. Mail-in ballots get mailed roughly two weeks before election day. Washington is a vote-by-mail state with same-day registration through election day at the elections office.

    Ballot certification typically runs two to three weeks after election day. As the desk’s protocol reminds us: until the Snohomish County Auditor’s office certifies a result, every count is preliminary. November 3 results are not the final results. They are the early count.

    The sequence matters because what happens this week — who files for what office — determines what voters in Everett will see when their ballots arrive in October. If nobody files for an open seat, the seat stays open by default rules and gets appointed. If only the incumbent files, the incumbent is re-elected without a contest. If two or more file, voters get a choice.

    What to Do Next

    If you are thinking about running:

    1. Pull up the 2026 Candidate Guide from snohomishcountywa.gov/5729/Run-for-Office before Monday morning. Identify the office, the salary, and the filing-fee amount.
    2. Decide whether to file online (sos.wa.gov/elections) or in person at 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett.
    3. Have payment ready — credit card if filing online, check or card if filing in person.
    4. File during business hours. If you wait until late Friday afternoon, you are competing with everyone else who waited.

    If you are thinking about supporting someone else who should run:

    1. Send them this article today. They have until Friday.
    2. Help them identify the office, find the filing fee, and walk through the Candidate Guide.
    3. If you live in the same district, ask them whether they would sign their name if you filed.

    If you are not running but want to follow what fills out this week:

    • Snohomish County Elections will post the candidate list shortly after filing closes Friday at 5 p.m. The list lives at the Candidates and Measures on the Ballot page (snohomishcountywa.gov/5722/See-Whats-on-the-Ballot).
    • Washington’s statewide candidate list is at voter.votewa.gov.
    • The Daily Herald, My Everett News, and the Snohomish County Tribune all cover filing-week results once the list is final.

    What This Costs the Public

    Filing week itself costs the public almost nothing — Snohomish County Elections runs as a baseline function of the Auditor’s office regardless of how many candidates file. The downstream cost is the August primary, which the county runs whether two candidates file or two hundred. The election infrastructure is paid for; the unknown variable is whether residents get a real choice on the ballot.

    That is the actual stake of filing week. Not money. Not partisan advantage. Just whether November 2026 is a real election or a paperwork formality for offices Everett residents pay for and live under.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    When does candidate filing open and close in Snohomish County?

    Filing opens at 8 a.m. Monday, May 4, 2026, and closes at 5 p.m. Friday, May 8, 2026. There are no extensions for any reason.

    Where can I file as a candidate?

    Online at sos.wa.gov/elections (recommended), in person at Snohomish County Elections, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Admin West Building, 1st Floor, Everett, WA 98201, by email to elections@snoco.gov, or by fax to (425) 355-3444.

    Is the Everett City Council on the 2026 ballot?

    No. The next Everett City Council seats up for election are at-large positions 6 and 7, which are on the November 2027 ballot. The 2026 ballot includes other positions that affect Everett, including Snohomish County Council seats, county-wide offices, and judicial positions.

    How much does it cost to file?

    For most paid offices, the filing fee is 1% of the office’s annual salary. The fee must be paid at filing or no later than 5 p.m. Friday, May 8. Candidates who cannot afford the fee can file a petition with signatures of registered voters in the jurisdiction in lieu of payment.

    What happens if nobody files against an incumbent?

    The incumbent is re-elected by default. There is no general-election ballot contest for an unopposed seat under the same party.

    When is the 2026 primary?

    August 4, 2026. The general election is November 3, 2026. Washington is a top-two primary state — the top two finishers in any primary advance to November regardless of party.

    Where can I find the official list of every office on the 2026 ballot?

    The 2026 Candidate Guide on the Snohomish County Elections “Run for Office” page (snohomishcountywa.gov/5729/Run-for-Office) lists every office, the filing fee, and whether the office files with the county or with the state. The statewide list lives at voter.votewa.gov.

    Who do I call if I have questions about filing?

    Snohomish County Elections at (425) 388-3444. Call before you file rather than after.

  • North Mason School Levy Leads in Early Election Returns

    North Mason School Levy Leads in Early Election Returns

    After two consecutive defeats and more than a year of painful budget cuts, the North Mason School District’s levy is leading in early returns — but results are not yet certified.

    According to the Mason County Auditor’s Office, the April 28 special election produced 2,130 yes votes (53.50%) and 1,851 no votes (46.50%) in combined Mason and Kitsap county totals as of election night. The Mason County Auditor’s website notes that ballot processing continues through May 7, 2026. These are preliminary results. Final certified totals are available at results.vote.wa.gov.

    Superintendent Kristine Michael responded cautiously. “We are very pleased and encouraged by these preliminary results, and we will be monitoring closely as ballots continue to be counted and certified,” Michael told local media on election night. “If this outcome holds, it reflects the trust this community is placing in our schools and our students.”

    The district lowered its ask substantially heading into this vote. The April levy requests $18.9 million over four years at a rate of $1.01 per $1,000 of assessed property value — down from the $1.28 rate attached to the two 2025 proposals that both failed. Before the election, the district also made $1.3 million in additional cuts and eliminated two administrative positions as a concession to community feedback.

    The levy funds programs that state basic education dollars don’t cover: safety officers, school nurses, counselors, athletics, music, Advanced Placement courses, custodians, and curriculum materials. North Mason has been operating without levy funding in 2026 following back-to-back 2025 failures, which forced the district to cut roughly $4.5 million from its budget.

    Even if the levy is certified, funds won’t arrive until April 2027 at the earliest — meaning the programs already cut will not be immediately restored. “Those funds would allow us to avoid making additional reductions, but because we are operating with only a partial year of levy revenue even in a passage scenario, we would not be in a position to restore programs or positions already reduced,” Michael said in a prior statement.

    The school board is composed of Arla Shephard Bull, Leanna Krotzer, Erik Youngberg, Nicole González Timmons, and Nicholas Thomas, with Superintendent Dr. Kristine Michael leading the district from its Belfair campus at 250 E. Campus Drive, Belfair, WA 98528, (360) 277-2300.

    This story will be updated when results are certified by the Mason County Auditor. Track live results at results.vote.wa.gov.

    Related Coverage on the April 28 Levy Result