Tygart Media

Tag: Lisa Lefeber

  • What 15 Years and $350 Million Built: The Port of Everett Story That Other Cities Are Now Studying

    What 15 Years and $350 Million Built: The Port of Everett Story That Other Cities Are Now Studying

    What does a successful waterfront transformation actually look like? The Port of Everett spent 15 years and $350 million finding out — surviving a developer bankruptcy, a recession, and its own false starts. Today, Cascadia Daily News named it the regional blueprint other cities are studying. Here is the full story of how Everett got here, and what comes next.

    A Major Pacific Northwest Outlet Just Called Port of Everett the Waterfront Model

    Cascadia Daily News, the Pacific Northwest’s most-read regional outlet, published a deep feature today as part of its four-part “Sea Change” series examining waterfront redevelopment across Western Washington. Part two focuses entirely on the Port of Everett’s Waterfront Place — and it positions Everett as the benchmark that other ports, including Bellingham, are now studying.

    The headline says it plainly: “After a bankrupt developer and broken promises, Port of Everett is realizing its waterfront vision.” The subheading: “15 years and $350 million turned 65-acre windfall into restaurants, housing and marine trades.”

    For those of us who live here, it’s easy to take the waterfront for granted. A Thursday evening in the rain, there’s still a line out the door at Tapped Public House. Families are walking the esplanade. Boats are in the marina. But to understand what we’re actually standing on, it helps to know the story of how this almost never happened — and the lessons Everett is now teaching to other communities wrestling with the same questions.

    The Bankruptcy That Changed Everything

    In 2005, the Port of Everett made what seemed like a reasonable bet. It sold 65 acres of prime north marina waterfront land to Maritime Trust Co., a Chicago-based developer, for a planned $400 million mixed-use redevelopment. The vision: 600 housing units, retail, office space, boat moorage, and light industrial boat businesses on land that had been dominated by mills and fishing since Everett’s founding.

    Maritime Trust had development capabilities, but Lisa Lefeber — now the Port of Everett’s executive director, then a communications specialist — says the firm never quite got Everett. Some of their conceptual ideas drew on Vancouver’s Granville Island for inspiration, which she described as “a disconnect” from what this community actually was.

    Then 2008 happened. Maritime Trust lost its main financier, Merrill Lynch, when the Great Recession hit. The developer filed for bankruptcy. The Port of Everett spent years in federal bankruptcy court to win back those 65 acres — land that had once been theirs, land that the community had entrusted them to steward well.

    By 2012, the port had the land back. And a decision to make.

    The Pivot That Made the Difference: No Master Developer

    The most important strategic choice the Port of Everett made after the bankruptcy wasn’t a design decision. It was a control decision: this time, the port would not sell the land. It would retain ownership, lease to tenants and developers, and remain the anchor of the waterfront’s direction.

    “When you don’t control the property, you don’t control how the site is used in terms of housing,” Lefeber told Cascadia Daily News. Maritime Trust, she noted, had wanted to turn the waterfront into “a private residential development” — the antithesis of why Washington state ports were created in the first place.

    The port also made another unconventional move: it built out streets and utilities across the waterfront before tenants arrived. The goal was to “show value and proof of concept” and draw in the first housing development. It worked. The infrastructure investment de-risked the site for private partners and gave developers something tangible to build against.

    The third shift was community engagement. Rather than hand the vision to an outside firm, the port went back to Everett residents to ask what they actually wanted. “We want it all,” Lefeber said in the CDN feature, describing the port’s philosophy. “We want industry. We want a place for people and families to be able to play and work and live. One of our big philosophies is a working waterfront.”

    What $350 Million Built

    Fifteen years and $350 million later — $175 million from private partners (hotel and apartment construction) and $175 million from a mix of federal grants, state funding, and Port of Everett financing and revenue — Waterfront Place encompasses five districts on and around the north marina.

    Fisherman’s Harbor anchors the public-facing side: the “Restaurant Row” building with Tapped Public House, Rustic Cork, The Net Shed, Menchie’s, and Marina Azul is here, along with the Sawyer and Carling condo buildings, the Port’s administrative offices, and the hotel. The Craftsman District keeps more than 20 marine trades businesses — boat repair, storage, and service operations — embedded in the broader development. The state’s largest public marina sits steps from it all.

    Jeff LaLone, co-owner of Bayside Marine, which specializes in boat storage and service for vessels under 50 feet, told CDN what the environment has meant to his business: “Everybody does a good job of just trying to have a good, nice, beautiful place to come to. For me to sit at my desk and look out the window, I’m looking at the boats, and you can walk down the street and grab something to eat. It’s just really nice.”

    Jack Ng, owner of both Fisherman Jack’s and Muse Whiskey & Coffee Bar — the latter housed in the historic Weyerhaeuser building, complete with a private whiskey collection inside the building’s vintage vault — said he was drawn to the waterfront because of the port’s long-term vision. “That building is going to be a big icon piece. I just want to be part of the history.”

    Ng also serves as a port commissioner for the Port of South Whidbey, so he understands the economic development role from both sides: “They can help a small business grow. They’re not there to have 100 percent of return on the investment, and their investment is more for bringing jobs for the local economy.”

    The Honest Assessment: Still a Work in Progress

    Lefeber doesn’t oversell what’s been built. Giant piles of dirt and gravel are still visible. Signs point to what’s coming next. The Millwright District — the 10-acre inland extension of Waterfront Place — still needs to be built out. The plans call for more than 300 housing units and 125,000 square feet of office space, but the port is actively reconsidering that mix.

    “With the U.S. shift to remote work, it may not make sense to create a huge office building at the waterfront,” Lefeber said. The port is now asking: “Is there a better mix of balance? Like, do we look at 80,000 square feet of office, and then maybe a hotel?” The flexibility to revisit plans is part of the model — Waterfront Place is not locked into a master developer’s decade-old blueprint.

    Lefeber’s description of waterfront redevelopment has become something of a mantra: “It’s been a little bit of a roller-coaster. I always joke with anything waterfront redevelopment, it’s two steps forward, and then you get punched back through the wall.”

    The Alexa’s Café closure, the delayed Marina Azul opening, the long wait for Millwright Phase 2 to get moving — all of it fits the pattern. The progress is real, but it’s never linear.

    What Fully Built Looks Like: $8.6 Million a Year in Local Tax Revenue

    When Waterfront Place is complete across all five districts, the port projects $8.6 million a year in local sales tax revenue. That’s not a speculative forecast — it’s the mathematical outcome of the retail, restaurant, housing, and hospitality uses the port has already proven it can attract and sustain. The 3.4% retail vacancy rate across Snohomish County provides additional evidence that demand for this kind of space isn’t hypothetical.

    The Port of Everett’s $70 million 2026 budget includes continued waterfront infrastructure investment. The $11.25 million federal Pier 3 grant secured in April 2026 extends the same logic to the working seaport side: federal confidence in the Port of Everett’s management and vision is showing up in competitive grant awards.

    Why Bellingham — and the Rest of Washington — Is Watching

    The Cascadia Daily News “Sea Change” series is explicitly benchmarking Bellingham against Everett and other ports. The parallel is uncomfortable but accurate: Bellingham’s waterfront, like Everett’s in the early 2000s, has sat partially undeveloped for years while port officials, city officials, and community members debate what should go there. Some sections have sat empty for decades.

    What Everett’s story tells Bellingham — and any other community grappling with a waterfront opportunity — is that the critical decisions aren’t architectural. They’re about land control, infrastructure investment sequence, community authenticity, and patience with a 15-to-20-year timeline.

    The port retained ownership of the land rather than selling to a master developer. It built infrastructure before tenants arrived. It kept marine trades in the mix rather than prioritizing higher-margin residential. And it never lost sight of the fact that the waterfront belonged to the whole city, not just to the people who lived or worked there.

    That’s the lesson. And on a rainy Thursday evening in 2026, with a line out the door at Tapped and kids looking at the boats from the esplanade, it’s a lesson that appears to have worked.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    How much has been invested in Port of Everett’s Waterfront Place?

    More than $350 million has been invested in Waterfront Place over the past 15 years. Of that, $175 million came from private partners (hotel and apartment construction) and $175 million from a combination of federal and state grants and Port of Everett financing and revenue.

    Why did Port of Everett regain the waterfront land in 2012?

    In 2005, the Port sold 65 acres to Maritime Trust Co., a Chicago developer, for a planned $400 million redevelopment. After Maritime Trust lost its main financier (Merrill Lynch) in the 2008 recession, the firm filed for bankruptcy. The Port of Everett won back the land in federal bankruptcy court by 2012.

    What is the Millwright District at Port of Everett Waterfront Place?

    The Millwright District is the next 10-acre phase of Waterfront Place development. Plans call for more than 300 housing units and over 125,000 square feet of commercial/office space. The Port is currently reconsidering the office portion of the plan, potentially scaling it to 80,000 square feet and adding a hotel component instead.

    What will Waterfront Place generate in tax revenue when complete?

    When fully built out across all five districts, Waterfront Place is projected to generate $8.6 million per year in local sales tax revenue.

    What five districts make up Port of Everett’s Waterfront Place?

    Waterfront Place encompasses five districts: Fisherman’s Harbor (Restaurant Row, condos, hotel, Port offices), the Craftsman District (20+ marine trades businesses), the state’s largest public marina, Pacific Rim Plaza (public gathering space and art), and the emerging Millwright District. The working seaport with Pier 3 is located approximately 2 miles away.

    Why is Bellingham studying Port of Everett’s waterfront model?

    Cascadia Daily News’s “Sea Change” series (published May 7, 2026) selected Port of Everett as a case study for Bellingham because the two cities share parallel histories: both had prime waterfront acreage tied up by troubled development deals, and both faced community questions about the right balance between working waterfront and public-facing amenities. Bellingham is at the beginning of its redevelopment journey; Port of Everett shows what 15 years of sustained execution can produce.

  • Port of Everett Just Won a PSBJ Operational Excellence Award — And the Real Story Is the $4.3M Electrification Project Starting This Year

    Port of Everett Just Won a PSBJ Operational Excellence Award — And the Real Story Is the $4.3M Electrification Project Starting This Year

    Port of Everett Just Won a PSBJ Operational Excellence Award — And the Real Story Is the $4.3M Electrification Project Starting This Year

    Q: Why did the Port of Everett win the Puget Sound Business Journal’s Operational Excellence award in 2026?

    A: For weaving sustainability into every operational decision across its Seaport, Marina, and Waterfront Place properties — including a 16-category Climate Change Strategy, a real-time emissions analytics pilot called DAPE, and a $4.3 million WSDOT electrification grant that funds zero-emission cargo handling equipment with work starting later in 2026.

    The Puget Sound Business Journal handed the Port of Everett its 2026 Environmental Sustainability Award for Operational Excellence on May 1, and we want to talk about it for a minute — because the press release version of this story is a feel-good announcement, and the actually-interesting version is the line near the bottom about a $4.3 million WSDOT grant that’s about to put zero-emission cargo equipment on the working waterfront.

    That’s the story we’d rather tell.

    The Award, Briefly

    The Puget Sound Business Journal recognized the Port of Everett in its 2026 Environmental Sustainability Awards in the Operational Excellence category. The framing from PSBJ is that environmental stewardship runs through how the Port makes operational decisions — not as an add-on, but as one leg of what CEO Lisa Lefeber calls a “triple-bottom-line approach” weighing economy, environment, and community on every call.

    “Environmental stewardship is an important priority for the Port, and you can see that it is woven into every operational decision the team makes, whether at the Seaport, the Marina, or our properties at Waterfront Place,” Lefeber said in the Port’s announcement.

    Port of Everett Commission President David Simpson framed it forward: “As stewards of our waterfront, environmental sustainability is an important aspect of the Port’s work. We will continue to enhance our efforts as we prepare for the next 100 years of stewardship.”

    Why This Award Actually Matters

    Awards are easy to skip. This one is worth not skipping for two reasons.

    First, the criteria. PSBJ’s Operational Excellence category isn’t a “you announced a goal” award. It’s a “you put it into operations” award. The Port had to show its work — and the work it showed reads like a checklist of things you don’t usually see all stacked on the same waterfront.

    Second, what’s coming next. The award is essentially the public-facing receipt for a body of work that includes a real-time emissions analytics platform the Port piloted in 2025, a Climate Change Strategy with 16 distinct action categories, and a freshly funded electrification project that will start putting equipment in the ground later this year.

    That’s the part of the story that hits Everett directly, and it’s the part the press release buried.

    The 16-Category Climate Change Strategy

    The Port’s Climate Change Strategy organizes its sustainability work into 16 tailored action categories — covering everything from infrastructure resilience (think: bulkheads, wharves, and shoreline protection that have to survive sea-level rise and increasing storm intensity) to operational changes (how cargo moves, what equipment runs on what fuel, where electricity comes from).

    The framework is the Port’s answer to a question that doesn’t have a single industry answer yet: how does a working seaport — one that handles roughly $21 billion in exports a year and supports more than 40,000 jobs — actually decarbonize without giving up the cargo function that pays for everything else on the waterfront?

    Sixteen categories is a lot for a port of Everett’s size to take on. The Port of Seattle’s strategy is structured differently. The Port of Tacoma’s looks different again. Everett’s choice to itemize the work this way is part of why the recognition came down on operational execution, not just policy.

    The DAPE Pilot — Real-Time Emissions Analytics

    In 2025 the Port piloted a program called Decarbonization Analytics for Port Equipment, or DAPE — a real-time emissions monitoring and analytics platform that lets ports identify decarbonization opportunities without having to first build new infrastructure to do the measuring.

    The practical version: instead of waiting for a long emissions inventory cycle to reveal that a particular crane or yard tractor is the dirty one, DAPE shows it in operations data as it happens. That changes what the Port can act on quickly — fuel choices, idling rules, equipment scheduling, cargo flow — and it gives a baseline against which the bigger capital moves (electrification, equipment replacement) can actually be measured.

    The pilot won an award of its own when it launched. The fact that it’s now folded into the larger Operational Excellence recognition tells you the Port treated DAPE as part of regular operations rather than a one-off pilot that ended.

    The Numbers That Made the Case

    A piece of the case PSBJ would have looked at: between 2005 and 2021 — across a span when cargo volumes through the Port surged nearly 300% during the pandemic — the Port reduced CO₂ emissions per ton of cargo by 51% compared to 2005 inventories, and 34% compared to 2016 inventories.

    That’s an emissions intensity drop achieved while throughput went up. It’s the kind of number that’s hard to fake and harder to dismiss. The Port participated in the Puget Sound Maritime Emissions Inventory to get the underlying measurements, which means the methodology is shared across Puget Sound ports — apples to apples.

    The $4.3M Electrification Project — The Story Inside the Story

    Here’s the line we want to dwell on, because it’s the part of the announcement that actually changes what’s about to happen on the working waterfront.

    The Port has a $4.3 million grant from the Washington State Department of Transportation through the Washington Port Electrification Program. It funds the Port’s Port Electrification Project, which advances electrification at the Port’s marine terminals and invests in lower- and zero-emission cargo handling equipment.

    Work starts later this year.

    What that means in practice: the Port’s marine terminals — Pier 1, Pier 3, the South Terminal area on the working waterfront — are about to get electric infrastructure that supports zero-emission cargo equipment. The funding source matters here. It’s coming from Washington’s Climate Commitment Act, the cap-and-invest program that’s been generating revenue from emissions allowances since 2023 and routing that money into climate-action investments.

    So the chain is: Washington’s biggest emitters pay into the cap-and-invest program → WSDOT runs a Port Electrification Program with that money → the Port of Everett gets $4.3 million → Everett’s working waterfront gets electric cargo equipment and the infrastructure to charge it → emissions per ton of cargo keep dropping.

    That’s a real money-to-equipment chain, not a slogan. And it ties Everett directly into the politically contested CCA in a way that’s easy to see and easy to point at when the program comes up for renewal or repeal debates.

    What This Means for Everett

    Three concrete things change because of the recognition and the grant behind it.

    Pier 3 gets a quiet upgrade beyond the rebuild. Pier 3 is already getting an $11.25 million federal PIDP grant for structural rebuild that we covered last week. Layered on top of that, the Port Electrification Project adds the electric infrastructure that future cargo equipment will plug into. If you’re a Boeing logistics planner moving oversized parts through Pier 3 — which handles 100% of Boeing’s oversized aerospace components — the long-run picture is a quieter, cleaner Pier 3 where the cranes and yard tractors don’t sit idling on diesel between moves.

    Air quality on the working waterfront moves in the right direction. Diesel cargo equipment is one of the meaningful contributors to local air quality on a working seaport. Electrification swaps that out for grid power — which in Snohomish County is largely hydroelectric via Snohomish County PUD. The neighborhoods directly above the Port — Bayside, Northwest Everett — get the air-quality dividend.

    The Port positions itself for the next round of grants. Federal and state agencies giving out infrastructure money increasingly have decarbonization criteria built into the scoring. Ports that have already done the operational work — measured emissions, run pilots, executed on grants — score better in the next round. The PSBJ recognition is a marker that gets cited in future applications.

    The Quiet Part About Tariffs

    The Port’s 2026 budget — adopted late last year — explicitly noted that the Port was working “despite challenges amid changing tariff guidance and market conditions.” That language is specific to the trade environment heading into 2026.

    The Operational Excellence award isn’t directly about tariffs, but it’s adjacent. A port that’s running tighter operationally — measuring its emissions in real time, running on data, securing climate grants — is also a port with a better grip on its cost structure when global trade gets choppy. The two stories are the same story, told different ways.

    How the Award Connects to the Rest of the Waterfront

    The recognition lands in the middle of one of the most active stretches in Port history. Pier 3 is rebuilding. The Segment E bulkhead and wharf project at Port Gardner Landing is in its final phase. Waterfront Place is 95% leased on the residential side and S3 Maritime just opened on the marine services side. Mukilteo waterfront assembly is in motion.

    The PSBJ award says, quietly, that the Port can do all of that and still win on environmental operations at the same time. That’s the through-line worth holding onto.

    What to Watch For Next

    A few specific things will tell you whether the Operational Excellence recognition is real or just a press cycle.

    The first is the start of the Port Electrification Project later this year. Watch for procurement notices on electric cargo handling equipment and for shore-power infrastructure permits. Those are the construction-document equivalents of the work being real.

    The second is the next iteration of the Puget Sound Maritime Emissions Inventory. The 2021 inventory showed the 51% per-ton emissions drop versus 2005. The next one will tell us whether the trend held through the pandemic-era cargo surge and into 2026 conditions.

    The third is the Port’s Climate Change Strategy update. The 16 action categories aren’t static; the strategy is meant to be revisited. Watch for which categories get accelerated and which get reframed as conditions change.

    We’ll be tracking all three.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: When did the Port of Everett win the Puget Sound Business Journal’s Operational Excellence award?

    A: The Port of Everett was recognized by the Puget Sound Business Journal in its 2026 Environmental Sustainability Awards, with the Operational Excellence honor announced on May 1, 2026.

    Q: What is the $4.3 million Port Electrification grant?

    A: It’s a Washington State Department of Transportation grant from the Washington Port Electrification Program, funded by the Climate Commitment Act. The Port of Everett will use it to advance electrification at its marine terminals and invest in lower- and zero-emission cargo handling equipment, with work scheduled to start later in 2026.

    Q: What is DAPE — the Port of Everett’s Decarbonization Analytics for Port Equipment program?

    A: DAPE is a real-time emissions monitoring and analytics platform the Port piloted in 2025. It identifies operational efficiencies and decarbonization opportunities without requiring new infrastructure investment to do the measuring.

    Q: How much has the Port of Everett reduced CO₂ emissions per ton of cargo?

    A: The Port reduced CO₂ emissions per ton of cargo by 34% compared to 2016 inventories and 51% compared to 2005 inventories, even as cargo volumes spiked nearly 300% during the pandemic, according to the 2021 Puget Sound Maritime Emissions Inventory.

    Q: How many categories are in the Port of Everett’s Climate Change Strategy?

    A: The strategy is organized around 16 tailored action categories spanning infrastructure resilience, operational changes, and long-range planning specific to the Port of Everett’s waterfront operations.

    Q: What does the Port Electrification Project mean for Boeing’s oversized cargo through Pier 3?

    A: Pier 3 handles 100% of Boeing’s oversized aerospace components moving through the Port. The Electrification Project adds the electric infrastructure that future zero-emission cargo equipment will use, alongside the separately-funded $11.25 million federal PIDP grant for Pier 3 structural rebuild.

    Q: Who are the Port of Everett’s senior leaders quoted in the announcement?

    A: CEO and Executive Director Lisa Lefeber leads Port operations, and Port of Everett Commission President David Simpson chairs the elected commission that sets policy.

    Q: How much economic activity does the Port of Everett support?

    A: Port activities support more than 40,000 jobs in the surrounding community and contribute $433 million in state and local taxes, and the Port is responsible for the movement of approximately $21 billion in exports.